Chris At The Pictures: comedy
Showing posts with label comedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label comedy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 October 2018

"The Greatest Snowman" or: How I Learned To Love Confused Customers

10/10/2018 03:51:00 pm 0
"The Greatest Snowman" or: How I Learned To Love Confused Customers

“Two for the...uh...that one with...” the middle-aged gentleman stood across the till from me turned desperately to his partner, who returned his blank look. I waited. The silence stretched. The queue fidgeted.

“Oh, bloody hell, what’s it called again?” he gesticulated to no-one in particular, before clapping a hand to his forehead. Sighing internally, I scanned my screen for the list of possible titles.

Insidious 3?”
“No.”
Three Billboards?”
“No.”
Darkest Hour?”
“No.”
All the Money in the World?
“Yes! The J. Paul Getty one! All the World’s Money! Knew it was something like that.”

When you start working at a multiplex, there’s a lot you prepare yourself for: an unshakeable popcorn smell, complaints about how you need to “take out a mortgage” to afford a cinema trip, and, of course, the usual mental strain that comes with a largely thankless retail job. But one unforeseen difficulty in getting patrons from queueing to viewing is their inability to remember what multimillion-dollar filmmaking exercise they’re donating to in the first place.

For the cinemagoers, they rest comfortably in their assumption that we can translate their request for “That one with Joanna Lumley” into “One for Finding Your Feet?”. For those of us on the other side of the counter it’s occasionally frustrating, but never dull.

The categories for incorrect titles are as manifold as the misnomers themselves, but after a few months, the repeat offenders become obvious: mispronunciation, misinformation and abbreviation.

Mispronunciations from those who count English as a second language are fair play, but from native speakers it’s amusing, if a little worrying. See, for instance, the Christian Bale western, Hostiles, spoken aloud by one Cambridge University student as “Hoss-teal-ezz”. Or, how about that new movie about space wizards, Star Wars Episode VIII, with the roman numerals pronounced as “Veeeee”.

Misinformation depends entirely on one’s exposure to the advertising campaign of the film in question. Despite posters plastered across the sides of buses, adverts playing on television, heavy Oscar buzz and a basis in Blitz-era nostalgia, one late-January release inexplicably proved enormously difficult for British citizens to recall. Thus follows a complete list of wrong labels I received for Joe Wright’s World War 2 drama, Darkest Hour:

The Darkest Hour
Our Darkest Hour
Darkest Night
Heart of Darkness
The Darkness
Hour of Darkness
The Hours
Last Hours
Finest Hour
Their Finest
Churchill
Winston Churchill
The Longest Day

Most forwent any attempt at the correct three syllables and simply asked for “The Winston Churchill one”.

Other marketing mishaps include “Last Call Pitches” (the tagline for Pitch Perfect 3, which enjoyed a larger space on the poster than the actual title) and “Wallace and Gromit” in place of Aardman’s Early Man, a film which sold itself mainly on homegrown affection for the Bristol-based studios original duo.

Abbreviation is where the definite/indefinite articles or any other words deemed extraneous go to die. The former is easily forgivable (also working in reverse, adding “The” to titles that never had one e.g. The King of Thieves). The latter is the most entertaining of all categories, usually reserved for films with unreasonably long names, needless subtitles, chapter numbers and so on. Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri proved especially popular in this respect. Besides one patron who spoke in a hugely immersive southern drawl, not a single customer bothered to go the whole hog. “Ebbing” was the first to go, followed by “Outside Missouri” (once replaced with exasperation as “Three Billboards in whatever”). By the time its run in UK cinemas was coming to a close, this once prized Best Picture nominee had been reduced to “Billboards”. A personal favourite would be the supremely confident woman who requested a ticket for “Three Billiards”.

But by far the most notable entry here would be (deep breath) The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society. Customers - understandably - had so much trouble getting through all eight words of this twee British confection that many resorted to “The Guernsey Film”, “The Potato one”, or, brilliantly, “The one with the stupid title”.

All this anecdotal evidence might lead one to consider wrong titles a source of irritation for those of us attempting to whittle down a sizeable Friday night queue. With sparse exceptions (such as a customer who repeatedly and angrily denied that he meant to say The Last Jedi when he asked for “The Last IMAX”), the very opposite is true.

Working in hospitality is repetitive, often exhausting and largely unrewarding, so those manning the concessions stand take our small pleasures where we can. Sometimes it’s worth spending seven hours behind a cash register, dashing about to refill endless popcorn bags, just for that one faintly amusing anecdote about the patron who changed the delicate, intriguing A Simple Favour into the more brusque “Do me a favour”.

So next time you arrive at the box office, desperately trying to recall the name of the film you’re about to pay £10.95 to see, don’t fret. No Googling the cast list, no scanning the foyer for a poster, no turning to your date/friend/mother for help; just give it a shot. Whether you leave out the episode number of the latest Star Wars film, mispronounce a foreign title or accidentally fuse the smash hit P.T. Barnum musical with a Michael Fassbender thriller, we’ll help you find your way.


This article was inspired by the writer’s current working experiences in a British cinema, as well as this Letterboxd list: https://letterboxd.com/shawn_stubbs/list/wrong-movie-titles/

Please share your experiences on Twitter, using the hashtag #WrongTitle

Tuesday, 3 July 2018

'Patrick' - Review

7/03/2018 09:58:00 am 0
'Patrick' - Review

★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆


Even by the usual standards of pet-centred pictures, this film of asinine canine antics is one for the pound. Beattie Edmonson is put-upon English teacher Sarah, whose grandmother passes away and leaves the irritable singleton her prized pug, Patrick. Before long, the poop-happy pooch is wrecking her flat, embarrassing her in front of the neighbours and thwarting all attempts for Sarah to be rid of him. The most unbelievable part of an extortionately convoluted plot is that, in the age of sickly viral videos and entire social media campaigns dedicated to them, a pug would be impossible to sell (I’ll bet that somewhere on the cutting room floor lies a scene in which Patrick gets his own Instagram).


And it is a frankly labyrinthine tangle of a story for a (supposedly) cutesy kids movie. Sarah must face a possible eviction, carjacking pupils (who, of course, all look about 25), a rotten family, a fun run, nasty rival teachers, and two possible suitors. They arrive in the form of the frankly awful Ed Skrien and Tom Bennett, both almost unrecognisable beneath pained expressions that exude less “Kiss me” and more “Kill me”. Everyone - Edmonson included - looks like they wish they were somewhere else, while Jennifer Saunders looks like she should be somewhere else, staggering in from the sidelines every now and again to offer everyone cake when she should be offering them criminal compensation.


Patrick, meanwhile, wanders about causing every manner of upset, all carried off with the comic timing of a particularly bad episode of The Chuckle Brothers and the editing skills of a toddler. Impressively, for a film in which the dopey dog single-handedly demolishes Sarah’s apartment, none of his messes ever quite outshine the script itself: a screenplay relying on coincidences so eye-rolling they’d have you throwing up if the dialogue didn’t already. Too tortuous for tots and too cloying for parents, it makes 90 minutes feel like 90 millenia.

Thursday, 17 May 2018

'Deadpool 2' - Review

5/17/2018 09:15:00 pm 1
'Deadpool 2' - Review


★ ★ ½ ☆ 


Leftover goodwill from 2016’s surprise smash hit doesn’t go the distance in this formulaic and overcranked sequel, which sees Ryan Reynolds slip back into the red onesie. Wade Wilson/Deadpool is mired in a depressive downturn after his wife, Vanessa (Morena Baccarin, who somehow has even less to do this time around), is murdered. His attempts to make amends for his mistakes by joining the X-Men are swiftly shot down when his a botched mission lands him in jail beside Russell (Julian Dennison), a teenage mutant with a highly combustible nature. They’re soon on the run from Josh Brolin’s Cable, a time-travelling cyborg with little patience for the titular twerp’s smart mouth.


Sadly, it’s an attribute with which I entirely sympathise. I was never the world’s biggest fan of the first film, but was found myself won over - almost reluctantly - by its irreverence towards the wider superhero movie landscape. Plus, the years spent in development hell and a need for justice after Fox’s criminal representation of Deadpool in X-Men Origins: Wolverine gave it a strangely underdog status. Now, removed from it’s lowly spot on the studio ladder and armed with a budget more in-keeping with your average blockbuster, the fourth-wall breaks, extreme violence and juvenile humour seem far less subversive than before.


There are still plenty of jokes that land (I missed the second big laugh of the film as my eyes were still watering from a sharp inhalation of drink at the opening visual gag), but if you’re not one for dick jokes or endless pop culture references, you’re in a for a rough ride. A grotesque and potentially brilliant Basic Instinct nod is ruined by a character saying out-loud “Basic Instinct!”.


There’s also a streak of self-fellating hypocrisy to some of the comedy which didn’t sit well with me. One aside sees The Merc With The Mouth mockingly refer to Deadpool creator Rob Liefield’s inability to draw feet, yet the artist receives a ‘special thanks to’ credit. Also, for the plentiful supply of jokes aimed at white men getting away with sexual assault, accused abuser T.J. Miller returns as Weasel. The producers claimed “We’re in the final editing” when the accusations emerged, but in an age where Ridley Scott can re-shoot half a movie in the wake of such allegations, that sort of excuse won’t fly.


David Leitch (John Wick, Atomic Blonde) replaces Tim Miller behind the camera this time, and his snappy, brutal approach to combat feels too...much. Action in a Deadpool film should be light and wacky, but the prison break sequence involving Cable and a horde of armoured guards is the wrong kind of bone-crunching. The creaky visual effects have been given a massive overhaul, but a smattering of the set pieces still remain dutifully small of scale, or openly reject the opportunity for mass carnage (see a hilariously anticlimactic skydiving sequence).


But for all its mockery of everything from shared universes to rival comic giant, DC, Deadpool 2 inexorably stumbles in the same potholes as those it purports to subvert. The villain is a grimdark bore. There’s an overblown vehicle chase. Emotional beats fall flat or are immediately interrupted by snark. And, of course, there’s a Stan Lee cameo.


And yet, Reynold’s clear affection for the character and crusade to please the comic fans for better or worse is undeniably admirable. He’s enjoying himself, and he wants you to share that joy. It’s great that Julian Dennison has landed such a spotlight so soon after his breakthrough appearance in Hunt for the Wilderpeople. It’s great that Negasonic Teenage Warhead (Brianna Hilderbrand) gets to have a girlfriend. It’s great that Zazie Beetz’ Domino (a new ally blessed with a superhuman lucky streak) gets to be a confident action heroine with visible, unmocked armpit hair. There are so many small victories against the usual pitfalls of major comic book fodder, but Deadpool 2’s adherence to a plethora of similar tropes and a suffocatingly smug sense of humour threaten to turn them pyrrhic. “Maximum effort”? Not quite.

Wednesday, 14 March 2018

'Gringo' - Review

3/14/2018 07:37:00 pm 0
'Gringo' - Review

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Laughs are sparse and the plot’s a farce in this occasionally funny but largely overstuffed caper from Nash Edgerton. David Oyelowo stars as Harold Soyinka, a hapless corporate underdog whose attempt to get back at his obnoxious boss, Richard (Joel Edgerton), by faking his own kidnapping by the Mexican cartel goes wrong.

A simple and perfectly workable setup (disgruntled employee hatches ridiculous plan) soon becomes an odyssey involving not only the cartels but a botched drug deal, a young couple caught in the middle (Harry Treadaway and Amanda Seyfried), a corrupt boss, adultery back home, and corporate espionage. For a labyrinthine spy thriller: great. In terms of keeping a self-billed comedy afloat: very unhelpful.

Almost as unhelpful is the film’s depiction and utilisation of Mexico and it’s culture. It’s all Day of the Dead celebrations, shady bars, drug running and the aforementioned cartels, or simply a foundation for useful - and highly misleading - marketing materials (the poster is plastered with various flowered skulls and similar paraphernalia). The image painted by said posters and the snappy trailer sets the audience up for a laugh-a-minute romp, but in fact the laughter comes dotted across vast deserts of joyless meandering. The one good piece of slapstick (Sharlto Copley’s bearded spy being knocked into a roly-poly by a car) is in the trailer, and the remaining violence is too efficiently brutal, too truly nasty to be in any way amusing. 

And, stuck helplessly in the middle of everything, is Oyelowo. That he’s been given the lead role in a mainstream American comedy should be cause for celebration (even more so when he gets to use his native Nigerian accent), but it’s a piece of casting that puts his powers to little use. His unshakable aura of intelligence betrays any attempt to portray Harold sincerely, but his natural charisma stays the course during all-too-brief scenes of character-building between the clueless stooge and Seyfried’s beaming holidaymaker.

The film is completely stolen from under all of them by Charlize Theron as Edgerton’s number two, a shy and sultry businesswoman with a penchant for loose shirts and cutting insults. Think Cruella de
Vil with a pixie cut. Her quest to toss aside the many useless men makes for some entertaining payoff once the countless convoluted threads come together, but it’s too little too late. 

Saturday, 10 March 2018

'Game Night' - Review

3/10/2018 10:04:00 am 0
'Game Night' - Review

★ ★ ★ ½ ☆

Hanging amiably in the balance between Paul Feig and Edgar Wright, this action comedy from the team behind Horrible Bosses (directors John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein) delivers on its premise with panache and laugh-a-minute gags. Jason Bateman and Rachel McAdams play Max and Annie, a couple who hold regular ‘game nights’ with their friends, all-the-while spurning the self-invitations of creepy cop neighbour, Gary (Jesse Plemons, gurning to perfection). When Max’s brother, Brooks (Kyle Chandler), all fast cars and fancy houses with the mannerisms of a movie trailer narrator appears, Max’s masculinity and sperm mobility (he and Annie are trying in vain for a baby) are threatened. In what seems another effort to outshine his younger brother, Brooks devises his own game night, inviting Max, Annie and their four friends (Lamorne Morris and Kylie Bunbury as a bickering couple, plus Billy Magnussen as Max’s inept pal, who brings along his date, played by Catastrophe’s Sharon Horgan). His promise of a hyperreal, Taken-style scenario goes horribly awry when it appears that an actual kidnapping takes place before the assembled yuppies’ very eyes.

What follows is a surprisingly inventive and raucous affair, as the three couples are left to decipher clues left behind by the kidnappers and fix their various scuffles. Bateman (at his deadpan best) and McAdam’s (on gleefully over-excitable form) adventure includes some light poking fun at performative masculinity and the usual non-committal dithering of a soon-to-be father, while Morris and Bunbury work through their characters’ past lapses in marital loyalty. Magnussen and Horgan are the purely comical duo: he’s an idiot showing her off as proof he can date someone smarter than his usual Instagram-obsessed former lovers, and she’s having none of it. Sliding smarmily in from the side-lines is Plemons, who barely has to shift a facial muscle to elicit snickering.

Mark Perez’ script draws out the best his cast have to offer and skimps on the off-the-cuff stylings that have regrettably become the standard in big screen American comedy. Torturously prolonged improv displays are largely dropped or at least cut short in favour of proper, scripted setups and payoffs that arrive in clever physical gags (the BBFC warning for ‘injury detail’ has never been lived up to with such hilarity), perfectly-pitched awkward interplay and acerbic quips that provide everything from a wry grin to full-on belly laughs. Ensure any food or drink items are a safe distance away during an extended joke involving the contents of Magnussen’s wallet and an all-too-brief appearance by Brooklyn Nine-Nine’s Chelsea Peretti.

That the film provides a steady stream of laughter is no mean feat, but is even more impressive when wedded effectively to formal ability. Variations of colour-grading, lighting techniques and camera movements in a movie of this type are so rare that even basic displays of technical prowess are a welcome surprise, not to mention CG-free car chases and even a ‘one-take’ fight sequence through a manor house. Sure, it’s no Atomic Blonde staircase brawl, but - along with a neat tilt-shift effect during establishing shots which transform the city streets and parking lots into game boards - it all adds up to a refreshing attempt at a visual identity that comedies rarely bother, let alone strive for in earnest. Composer Cliff Martinez (Drive) is even drafted in to provide a skippy synth score to further swell the film’s slick action credentials.

Said manor house set piece towards the climax is one spot where the overblown game threatens to become more bored than board, and the plot threads begin to pull together with an all-too-familiar sense that we’ve played this one before (gee, I wonder if Max will emerge less threatened by his brother after all?). You’ll forgive - and likely forget - these minor crimes: sheer volume of laughter makes a very convincing ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card.

Thursday, 21 September 2017

'Kingsman: The Golden Circle' - Review

9/21/2017 03:13:00 pm 0
'Kingsman: The Golden Circle' - Review

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Matthew Vaughn’s spy series makes a haphazard pivot from ‘parody of bad Bond films’ to ‘bad parody of itself’ in this simultaneously listless yet overblown sequel. Taron Egerton returns as Eggsy, now left with only Mark Strong’s agent Merlin for company when the Kingsman organisation is all-but obliterated around them. Their enemy: Julianne Moore’s drug overlord, Poppy, a sugary-voiced villainess with a penchant for human meat burgers, robots, and Elton John.

The first Kingsman was very much a Marmite film: you were either won over by its homegrown Bond/Bourne/Bauer pastiche or disgusted by its button-pushing. Being an awkward sort, I fell somewhere in the middle, appreciating the unabashed comic violence and Alex Rider overtones but blanching somewhat at its seedier elements, particularly that final bum note (pun fully intended).

Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman have clearly taken the controversy over Hanna Alström’s backside deeply to heart…and doubled-down. Partway through The Golden Circle (which sees Eggsy and Merlin join forces with their American counterparts, the Statesman), Egerton’s character is tasked with tagging the girlfriend of an enemy agent with a tracking device. With no explanation besides a sly wink from Pedro Pascal’s Agent Whiskey and a shrugged “It’s not going up her nose!”, our hero is to secrete the tracker within the genitalia of the oblivious Clara (Poppy Delevigne). After calling his girlfriend to ask her permission (which she does not give), Eggsy commits. As composers Henry Jackman and Matthew Margeson deliver a heroic fanfare, Matthew “bloody feminists” Vaughn treats us to a close-up the likes of which a certain orange-faced misogynist would call “Tremendous”.

Looking for any excuse for this abhorrence, some fans might reach for The Golden Circle’s plethora of great female roles. They’d come up short. Halström is a plot motivation, Eggsy’s classmate Roxy is blown to smithereens in the opening salvo, and Halle Berry (playing Merlin’s equivalent in the Statesman organization) is exposition in a wig.

Moore’s villain finds me yet again confused as to why I’m supposed to dislike the Kingsman antagonists (decapitation bombs and cannibal fast food hobbies aside). Hot on the heels of Samuel L. Jackson’s eco-warrior from the first film, Poppy’s demand to the government is the legalization and supervised access to recreational drugs, an aim that makes her more sympathetic than the brutish Anglo-American spies bulldozing their way across the globe to find her (at least, until her relationship with the US president is revealed, to more sinister ends).

Her beaming smile as she feeds Keith Allen into a mincer provides some glee, as do the rough-and-tumble brawls towards the film’s conclusion. A robot arm-wielding henchman allows for some inventive choreography, and in the long-take ballets of umbrellas and uppercuts, it’s easy to see where the budget’s been spent. It certainly didn’t go towards the CGI, which is replete with green-screen outlines and aliasing as digital models of buildings, landscapes and cages meld into one-another.

You may have noticed I haven’t got around to mentioning the other big names from the poster campaign: Channing Tatum, Jeff Bridges, and the inexplicable return of Colin Firth as Harry Hart. I only thought it fair to give them their representation as reflected by the film. Tatum is little more than a cameo appearance, Bridges is…well, Bridges, and I’m still not entirely convinced that Firth ever showed up. There’s a catchphrase-spouting waxwork doing an impression of him, though, the artifice of which is further exacerbated by Egerton’s uncrackable charisma.

As for Moore, her total screen-time is eclipsed by that of her popstar prisoner. John’s gormlessly smug guest spot culminates in his offering free tickets to his next gig, should the Kingsman help him escape. If his eye-scraping appearance here is any indication of his current talents, he can keep them.

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

'American Made' - Review

9/12/2017 10:59:00 pm 0
'American Made' - Review

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

Sold almost entirely on Tom Cruise’s ability to deliver a cheeky grin, American Made tells the ridiculous true story of Barry Seal, a TWA pilot hired by the CIA to provide reconnaissance footage in the early eighties. His skills are soon noted by the Medellin Cartel, and thus begins an eight-year odyssey of drug smuggling, arms dealing and mountains of cash large enough to shame Scrooge McDuck.

Cruise is back working with director Doug Liman, who – after achieving the impossible by making Hollywood’s ever-youthful hero look genuinely rattled in Edge of Tomorrow – makes a sharp 180-degree turn from their previous team-up. His direction and Gary Spinelli’s script turn the charisma dial up to eleven, giving Cruise that “I’m gonna buzz the tower” smirk we all recognize, but framing it in a frenetic and eye-popping series of increasingly ludicrous capers.

The film is also colour-timed to vibrant excess, but nowhere is the joy and madness more perfectly captured than by a supporting role from Domhnall Gleeson as CIA liaison ‘Schafer’, which proves once and for all that he’s at his best when doing sly, slimy cackling. Caleb Landry Jones also makes a brief but amiably bitter appearance as Seal’s homewrecking brother-in-law.

Occasionally, it is wearing. The whole Wolf of Wall Street vibe is a tad trite (Barry’s growing ambivalence to the jaw-dropping loads of money filling up his house, his preference for reading a book about the rise of Al Capone instead of confronting his problems), and the montages of our lovable pilot enjoying his vast extravagance face the same faults as Scorsese’s epic: we never really feel any ill-effects.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the treatment of Seal’s wife, Lucy (Sarah Wright). As is now seemingly par-for-the course with this sort of film, she’s almost a footnote. Brought out mainly for eyebrow-arching sequences of the couple having sex in the cockpit mid-flight, her disapproval and shock are played only for laughter. It’s an approach that reflects the films near-refusal to tread into anything remotely dark or upsetting: despite the danger constantly dogging Barry (guns, goons and maybe a little guilt), any danger to the audience’s expectations or sensibilities is severely lacking. It’s a frivolous flight of fancy that provides a great vehicle for Cruise’s shtick and Liman’s swift direction, but nothing more than that. It’s fast to please, but faster to fade.

Thursday, 24 August 2017

'The Hitman's Bodyguard' - Review

8/24/2017 10:30:00 pm 0
'The Hitman's Bodyguard' - Review
★ ½ ☆ ☆ ☆

Ryan Reynolds stars as Michael Bryce, a professional bodyguard looking to restore his damaged reputation in this self-satisfied smirk of an action comedy. Bryce’s ex, Ameila (Elodie Yung), an agent at Interpol, begs for his help to escort incarcerated assassin, Darius Kincaid (Samuel L. Jackson) from the streets of Coventry to a trial at The Hague. Determined to stop the pair is defendant Vladislav Dukhovich (a supremely bored-looking Gary Oldman), a convicted war criminal with ties to ethnic cleansing. Yep, that’s right, the main subplot in this knockabout buddy comedy is about genocide. Mass graves and anatomy jokes; it’s a match made in heaven!

At least, it is for Jackson: I honestly can’t remember the last time I saw him so happy. While it’s not a particularly revolutionary role (smattered with a meta gag or two about his infamous devotion to the MF-word), it’s nice to see he’s having a laugh…because the audience sure ain’t. I counted one chuckle amongst the crowd during my matinee, at a fart noise. Comedy lives?

If Jackson’s performance is a hopeful reflection of how we’re meant to feel, Reynolds is the realisation of our true feelings; namely boredom and resignation. That’s to say nothing of Elodie Yung and Salma Hayek (as Kincaid’s imprisoned wife). Come on, people, it’s 2017, is it really too much to ask that roles for women offer them more than to be sexually objectified (Hayek), to be rescued from fights with out-of-shape men that their character should easily be able to defeat (Yung), or just plain forgotten for entire acts of the movie (see both)?

When the film’s not saddling its women with perplexing double-agent plot threads or giggling along with the chummy antics of the central duo, it displays some genuinely respectable action sequences. A bike ‘n’ boat chase through Amsterdam packs a wallop, but it’s like someone airlifted a separate production crew in to film it. The shooty-stabby brawls elsewhere in the movie are efficiently swift, but the ruthlessness of the gore is never quite reconciled by the one-liners. There’s barely even a Nice Guys-style pause from Reynolds to pale at the carnage accrued by his client, and his reactions to Jackson’s guffawing amount to little more than parental exasperation.

Anyone paying a modicum of attention knows where Kincaid and Bryce’s relationship is heading, but just to make sure, the movie deploys heavy-handed musical cues at every possible moment to light our way. If it’s not through Atli Örvarsson’s sub-David Arnold score, it’s by calculated deployment of Foreigner’s I Want To Know What Love Is; a tactic which proved the final straw for me. Granted, not for the reason it’ll irk many people (I actually like the track, despite its place in the eighties soft rock canon I wish would disappear from pop culture for five seconds), but it’s still unearned and – like the endless CGI blood splatter – extravagantly cheap.

Tuesday, 4 July 2017

'Baby Driver' - Review

7/04/2017 02:30:00 pm
'Baby Driver' - Review
 
★ ★ ★ ½ ☆

Edgar Wright’s new film was the first time I took a notepad into the cinema, and if Baby Driver is any indication of experiences to come, I don’t think I’ll do so again. As Ansel Elgort's getaway driver murmured, spun and leapt his way across the screen, the pen and pad lay untouched in my lap and a smile grew unhindered on my face.

The young actor and his Han Solo jacket lead a minimal, high-impact cast including Kevin Spacey as Baby’s, well, Kevin Spacey-ish boss, Doc, Jamie Foxx as Bats (a trigger-happy criminal with a penchant for speeches) and Lily James as waitress Debora, with whom Baby is hopelessly smitten. With a string of successful getaways under his belt, our slick and silent hero wants desperately to escape Doc’s clutches, but has to complete one last heist.

Sometimes a film doesn’t have to be perfect for it to work. Sometimes it doesn’t even have to be good. But if one movement, one shot, one line of dialogue can trigger that glint of recognition, it’s worth the price of admission. The opening set piece of Baby Driver and its tap-dance editing is just that; a moment where everything else fades to mute as every part of your brain shouts “I do that!” Baby, keeping the engine warm as his accomplices complete a bank robbery, mimes and bops his way through Bellbottoms by The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion. He drums his fingers on the wheel and scoots from left to right in his seat, setting a precedent for the both the character and the film’s mode of address.

That need to walk to the beat, to cross the road before the chorus starts, to match the drop with the kicking of a discarded can is an urge I’ve carried with me since loading the maximum five (five!) albums on my first MP3 player, eleven years ago. Baby’s small irritation at having to rewind The Damned’s ‘Neat Neat Neat’ so the crescendo falls perfectly in line with the climax of the chase is the same twinge I get finding that sliver of a song that’ll accompany me on the two-minute walk from bus stop to front door, and no further. The scene’s construction seems the natural evolution of Wright’s signature style and is emblematic of why so many have been so rushed off their feet by Baby Driver.

There’s just something so inherently cinematic about the way Wright stages his shots, the way his editors smash cut after cut together with the efficiency and sheer ‘oomph’ of a pit-stop team. The same has been true of all his films (even The World’s End, the lesser of the Cornetto Trilogy, had it), and – though Baby Driver is considerably less overtly comedic than those that came before – the same quick-fire approach to laughter is also present. A joke is a joke, a self-contained moment or a visual gag instead of a meandering, self-congratulatory improv routine. And boy, is that refreshing.

I’ve been hit-or-miss with Elgort in the past (his charm in The Fault in Our Stars was buried by a visible discomfort in the Divergent series), but here his subdued, toddler-faced magic is worked effortlessly. Kevin Spacey is always good value for money, though one imagines the role of ‘hugely suspect suit’ isn’t too much of a stretch for someone currently playing the President of the United States. Watching Spacey, Foxx and a fabulously undercut-adorned Jon Hamm bounce off each other is never dull.

If there’s one person I feel bad for in this entire enterprise, it’s composer Steven Price. With a running time of 113 minutes and 102 of those covered by T. Rex, The Beach Boys, Simon and Garfunkel and more, the film leaves little room for a traditional score, so the Gravity and Fury alumnus is left in the dust. Lord knows he can score an action sequence (of which there’s no shortage here), but the central, essential conceit of Baby’s chase music has me feeling sheepish for even mentioning it.

To a lesser extent, Lily James also draws a short straw as the beaming love interest. She’s a real rising star and delivers the beating heart of the film during Elgort’s many silences, it’s just a shame that she’s little more than a narrative ignition. Baby’s adoration of Debora is still a solid foundation for the plot, and one that cements my understanding of Baby Driver as an old-fashioned Hollywood dream given a smart new paint job; True Romance for the iPod generation, perhaps.  If you stop to think about it for more than five minutes it all comes tumbling down in a series of coincidences and impossibilities, but one feels that can’t be helped.

It’s not a classic by any means but it’s a feisty, fanciful caper made with undeniable affection for the characters and the craft. Imagine if all Hollywood passion projects made the jump from dream to screen with such vigour, such a lack of self-importance. Contrast this to the uppity and languorous The Hateful Eight, the long-gestating vision of Quentin Tarantino (who Wright often cites as a huge influence, and who receives a special thanks in the closing credits of Baby Driver). High on petrol fumes and the lovable kind of film geekery, Wright brings us that classical Hollywood romp we could all do with, every once in a while: uncluttered, unpretentious, unabashed fun.

Saturday, 27 May 2017

'Colossal' - Review

5/27/2017 08:01:00 pm
'Colossal' - Review

★ ★ ★ ½ 

Far from neglecting the trappings of either monumental blockbuster or dry satirical comedy, Colossal wears its bizarre premise proudly on its sleeve. Largely, it’s all the better for it. Anne Hathaway plays Gloria, an alcoholic who is kicked out by her boyfriend, Tim (a fantastically clipped Dan Stevens), and heads back to her old hometown. Waking from a particularly rough night, Gloria turns on the TV to find a giant monster has trampled over the city of Seoul. But that’s not the weirdest discovery: after watching the creature for several days, Gloria realises it’s imitating her drunken movements as she wanders through the small town’s playground, even performing her unique nervous tic.

There are many things I really like about this bizarre curiosity of a film, even the bits that don’t quite gel. I love that it almost evades marketing in any way. Oh, the poster’s rather great (and will probably adorn a rather snazzy steelbook someday), but watching the trailers try to effectively echo its offbeat combination of crowd-pleaser and arthouse oddity is almost as fun as watching the film itself. I also love that director Nacho Vigalondo gets Jason Sudeikis to play against type so deceptively. He’s playing a childhood friend of Gloria’s, Oscar, who offers her a job at his bar and tries to help her get back on her feet. On a surface level that might not seem much of a stretch, but the role grows into something far different by the third act. I’m not sure I totally bought what that role becomes, but it certainly adds spice and allows for some great glaring between he and Hathaway.

The whole film has a blindfolded taste test feeling that brought me back to watching student previews during my early uni years, such as The Double, Frank, or Life After Beth. These were films that offered not only a break from packed multiplexes and sweaty club nights, but an anticipation that comes only from something deliberately different. ‘Anne Hathaway is a kaiju’ now rests alongside ‘Jesse Eisenberg has a clone’ and ‘Michael Fassbender has a papier mâché head’ in my personal canon of ‘Strange Premise, Stranger Film’.

And Colossal is strange. At times delivered as mumblecore drama, at others improv comedy, the film demonstrates remarkable reservation with its monster stomping. The rules of Gloria’s connection with the creature are established without contrived exposition, it’s something that we discover with the characters, and there’s no better guide than Hathaway. I’ve sorely missed her on-screen since Interstellar (I never caught The Intern, nor Alice Through the Looking Glass), and the wait has been more than worthwhile. I’m honestly not sure who else could carry the film through its few misjudged moments, or make me believe in a character who can show remorse for people thousands of miles away but seems incapable of calling her boyfriend back to say sorry.

It would be relatively easy for Colossal to thrive purely on Hathaway and Sudeikis’ grimacing or its water cooler premise alone, but it’s got far more to offer than that. The monster’s appearances, perpendicular to Gloria’s struggles with alcoholism, can be read in any number of ways. Whether it’s the not-so-subtle comment on self-destruction, what our idiocy does to people we’ll never even meet, or the somewhat deeper allusions to power as a corruptive force. One could even read the film as a comment on (stick with me here) what America does and doesn’t contribute cinematically to the rest of the world. Indie films (like the drama inhabited by Hathaway, Sudeikis and Stevens) rarely make it across the border, with US cinema represented abroad only by Hollywood behemoths (like the rampaging monster swatting helicopters from the air).


These themes do get a little lost amongst the clatter of the climax, but previous exploration of them was so restrained that I forgave it. I’m unsure whether these final moments exist purely keep mainstream audiences in their seats, but as a gentle nudge into summer tentpole season, it worked. Colossal should be appraised for refusing to skimp on shiny spectacle, but never letting it blind a genuine harmony of digital bombast and dramatic buoyancy. 

Wednesday, 3 May 2017

'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' - Review

5/03/2017 09:16:00 pm
'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' - Review

★ ★ ★  


“All you do is shout at each other!” – the frustrated words of cyborg assassin Nebula (Karen Gillan) ring loud and true regarding Marvel’s dizzying and thunderous return to the stars. Following an incursion with a giant tentacle monster and gold-faced aliens, the Guardians of the Galaxy find themselves split in two. Peter Quill (Chris Pratt), Gamora (Zoe Saldana) and Drax (Dave Bautista) head off into the unknown on the trail of the living planet, Ego (Kurt Russell), while Rocket (Bradley Cooper) and Groot (now Borrowers-scale and voiced by a squeaky Vin Diesel) are left to fend for themselves against hordes of space pirates.

To call anything that comes from the Disney-Marvel slate “risky” seems a bit much, but I at least confess my admiration for an audacious opening set piece, which places the action itself in the background and distracts us with a three-minute dance number as the titles play out. My enjoyment even stretched to the use of ‘Mr Blue Sky’, a song which I freely admit detesting, largely thanks to its association with many awful British summer time TV adverts.

Accidentally going along with things that shouldn’t work is an experience that defined my time spent in the company of James Gunn’s new film. Whether snorting at Drax’ cacophony of trouser humour or wryly noting the onslaught of 80’s pop culture references (is there really an audience crossover between Marvel and Cheers?), I had a great time with this movie, make no mistake…even if said movie itself is far, far from great. Despite its bum-numbing length, largely inconsequential roster of side characters and one moment where it turns into Man of Steel (and not in a good way), Guardians 2 is infectiously fun. The cast are engaging, the music – both the new Awesome Mix and Tyler Bates’ score – is glorious and hearty, and it leaves the audience awash with smiles.

Only occasionally does the smile falter. Constant bickering between the bunch gets a bit much, hence my sympathies with Nebula as the Guardians’ prisoner. Pratt’s delivery is the main offender, bouncing back between soft aural honey and wide-eyed barking, with Cooper’s shrieking raccoon a close second. Mercifully, they’re usually cut off mid-rant by Bautista’s pin-precise comedic timing or a relatable glower from Saldana. Even the extensively-marketed baby Groot gags take a good while to start wearing thin, stuffed to the brim as the film is.

Like a sports car stuck in traffic, the movie wants to whip-pan from scene to scene, but is reined in by sequences that take an age to pass. There’s so much going on visually and referentially (gags about Mary Poppins, Pac-Man and an allusion to Hitchcock’s North by Northwest, to name but a few), crammed into a narrative that hops from one side of the universe to the other like there’s a hedgehog in its seat.
Here, Guardians 2 goes for the whole Empire Strikes Back deal (the gang are separated after an early conflict and familial ties are revealed), but with a modicum of the depth and none of the darkness. But that’s fine: in a film with the aesthetic of a Haribo factory on fire, anything too challenging or tonally murky would set the atmosphere askance.

In terms of the wider cinematic universe this is little more than a jaunty side-step from endless avenging; the filmic equivalent of a village fireworks display. It goes on longer than anyone really needs it to, but you stay the course and suffer the repetitive whizz-bangs because there’s free candy floss, your best mates have turned up and you’re all howling with laughter because the vicar just took a Catherine wheel to the crotch.

Saturday, 4 February 2017

'The LEGO Batman Movie' - Review

2/04/2017 11:17:00 pm
'The LEGO Batman Movie' - Review

★ ★ ★ ★ 

Back in the early noughties, Warner Bros. took a mighty risk on an up-and-coming director, Christopher Nolan, gifting him the reins of their most lucrative property. Three films – bringing with them a decade of financial and critical success – defined a comic book legend for a whole new generation: tormented, elemental, and believable. Now another Chris (McKay, he of Robot Chicken fame) takes the directing seat and immediately shines a spotlight on the rubber nipples, pointing out the ridiculousness of trying to take a grown man and his cosplay obsession seriously.

In this spin-off of sorts to 2014’s anarchically enjoyable The LEGO Movie, the focus is purely on Will Arnett’s clueless crusader and his suits, villains, vehicles, puns, and – as noted by Ralph Fiennes’ Alfred - “even that weird stuff from 1966”. Barbara Gordon (Rosario Dawson) takes control of the Gotham Police force and suggests an allegiance with Batman, thereby threatening the winged wonder’s lifestyle of singlehandedly taking down criminals by day and guffawing at the dénouement of Jerry Maguire by night. Begrudgingly accepting help from newly-adopted Dick Grayson (an ingeniously cast Michael Cera), Batman sets out to prove his worth as a lone wolf with calamitous, hilarious results.

Moving at the same break-neck speed as its predecessor, LEGO Batman bobs and weaves through explosions of comedy. A burning heart of child-like joy, an outer debris field of pop culture content and smoky wisps of LEGO-obsessive in-jokes (the Gotham City cinema advertises 'Two Shades of Bley') ensure not a single funny bone is left un-tickled. It's not merely pointing and laughing at Batman; the screenwriters clearly love the character and his stories, and so the barely-contained affection they have for other fans shines just as brightly.

Arnett’s gravelly delivery never stops being hilarious and Cera is the finest he’s been since Scott Pilgrim, but our hearts belong entirely to Ralph Fiennes as Alfred and his very British expletives, always one step away from lumping "Master Bruce" with an ASBO. Meanwhile, Zach Galifianakis as the overly-attached Joker is a more interesting portrayal of the clown prince of crime than Jared Leto and his method-acting hokum will ever be. Plus he’s actually, y’know, funny!

The colourfully jovial attitude of the 60's TV show, a bombastic score worthy of the Nolan movies (Hans Zimmer’s frequent collaborator Lorne Balfe is an inspired choice of composer) and justice for some left behind by the Schumacher films seal the deal (Billy Dee Williams reprises his role as Harvey Two-Face after nearly thirty years). It's everything that 2016’s grossly misjudged adaptation of The Killing Joke wasn't: smart, beautifully animated and unquestionably cinematic, with a keenly unique eye for the Batman-Joker relationship. Additionally, it doesn't make Barbara Gordon surplus to seedy requirement, but instead an equal, nay, superior force to the mammalian mansplainer.

Drawbacks? Well, the central message intended to give the kids pause for thought is nothing particularly new. In fact, it borrows heavily from The LEGO Movie's "Everything is cool when you're part of a team" mantra...but frankly, when's that ever been a bad thing? It’s a family film in message and content, it’s ‘U’ certificate signified by my favourite of all BBFC guidance notes; “Contains rude humour”.

If there is any downside, it has to be that there aren’t any Batman jokes to make anymore. Seriously. YouTube’s How it Should Have Ended series may as well announce redundancy now that an entire avenue of superhero parody has now been swiftly neutralised with the stroke of a well-aimed Batarang. Trying to grab hold of every joke is like attempting to snatch bullets from the air, which seems entirely appropriate as a fault when that's a job more suited to Superman. When ‘too much comedy’ is the worst criticism I can level, there’s no choice but to concede defeat, don the plastic cowl, do a bit of Bat-beat-boxing and lay down the ‘THWACK!’ on some Daleks.


…oh, sorry, did I forget to mention there are Daleks in it?

Saturday, 14 January 2017

'La La Land' - Review

1/14/2017 06:51:00 pm
'La La Land' - Review

★ ★ ★ ★ 

Like many others, I’m sure; this review begins with a clarification. No, more a resigned confession: I’ve never been one for musicals. While everyone else of my generation grew up with the animated song-and-dance phenomenon of the Disney renaissance, the closest I got were cartoons with a few songs in them (predominantly Toy Story, the Phil Collins-heavy Tarzan and a crummy VHS copy of The Transformers: The Movie). There’ve been some exceptions every now and then, including but not limited to Jeff Wayne’s The War of the Worlds, parts of Les Miserables, and the time my housemate practically forced me to watch Chicago. Despite the varying quality of those examples, nothing has ever been able to shake my innate prejudice. I spent the opening logos of La La Land braced to cringe, waiting for the spasm in my gut and the embarrassed shiver to cross my cheeks…but neither came.

Instead, I spent two hours jigging my knee up and down in glee, weeping in wonder and beaming in total surrender, side-by-side with my mum (who, fittingly, took me to see Tarzan all those years ago). For those of you who’ve been living under a rock since the film’s dazzling first appearance at the Venice film festival, Damien Chazelle (Whiplash) directs Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone as Sebastian and Mia, two California dreamers who begin to fall in love after a chance encounter on a busy highway. Seb aspires to open his own Jazz club (in order to save what he sees as a dying genre), and Mia, a wannabe actor, is desperate to escape her life of serving coffee to the inhabitants of the Warner Bros. backlot (“That’s the street from Blade Runner!” – I whispered excitedly as the pair wandered among the vintage façades).

Yeah, I’ve never found myself attached to the grand heritage La La Land is so clearly besotted with, but throw in a location from one of my favourite movies, an original John Legend song and not one, but two sequences paying homage to Rebel Without a Cause, and you’ve got every inch of my being in an unrelenting embrace. Plus, giving Stone a lead role helps. Honestly, I could gush for hours about how her every eye roll, head spin and half-smile in this has extended my life expectancy by several decades, but we’d be here for twice that length.

Where Gosling is concerned, another of my long-held prejudices has been put to rest. While his woozy eyes have understandably wowed many, to me his expression has always appeared vacant, almost detached. In Shane Black’s The Nice Guys, this worked wonders (his character was a complete klutz), and here, too, his hazy gaze speaks to something authentic: the far-reaching mind of a dreamer. I finally get it, you guys.

Okay, now I’ve confessed and repented for my sins, can I gush about the routines, please? Cool, thanks: Justin Hurwitz’ songs are perfect, the dances move with the sweep and grace of sublime animation, and all are presented in a rainbow-soaked palette as flavoursome and primary as a packet of fruit pastilles. Standouts include a hilltop toe-tap (that moonlit beauty from the poster), a one-shot parkour through heavy traffic and a soaring waltz among the stars. Despite wanting to, I hesitate to blabber further: I’d hate to ruin any of what this film has in store.

In contrast to the stark colours, the morality of the story - of Seb and Mia’s victories and sacrifices - is far from black and white. I’m pressed to label it ‘earnest to a fault’…but, well; it hasn't got one! Chazelle knows we’re too cynical to buy a total lovesick ode to Tinseltown right now, so peppers the sweet with spice. Even I (a sometimes fantastically over-sentimental soul) could understand why the film makes certain moves towards the flip-side of fairy tales, undertaking manoeuvres I can’t illustrate any clearer for, again, fear of spoiling the surprise.

So: a glorious ear-worm of a soundtrack, astounding visuals, unfairly loveable stars and a surprisingly textured narrative…I think that just about covers it! Wait, there’s a ‘Take on Me’ cover, too? Complete with Gosling passive-aggressively plinking a keytar? Sod it, take your five stars and get out of here; you’re already too good for 2017 as it is.


P.S. Please don’t actually go, we need you. Badly.