Chris At The Pictures: gary oldman
Showing posts with label gary oldman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gary oldman. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 August 2017

'The Hitman's Bodyguard' - Review

8/24/2017 10:30:00 pm 0
'The Hitman's Bodyguard' - Review
★ ½ ☆ ☆ ☆

Ryan Reynolds stars as Michael Bryce, a professional bodyguard looking to restore his damaged reputation in this self-satisfied smirk of an action comedy. Bryce’s ex, Ameila (Elodie Yung), an agent at Interpol, begs for his help to escort incarcerated assassin, Darius Kincaid (Samuel L. Jackson) from the streets of Coventry to a trial at The Hague. Determined to stop the pair is defendant Vladislav Dukhovich (a supremely bored-looking Gary Oldman), a convicted war criminal with ties to ethnic cleansing. Yep, that’s right, the main subplot in this knockabout buddy comedy is about genocide. Mass graves and anatomy jokes; it’s a match made in heaven!

At least, it is for Jackson: I honestly can’t remember the last time I saw him so happy. While it’s not a particularly revolutionary role (smattered with a meta gag or two about his infamous devotion to the MF-word), it’s nice to see he’s having a laugh…because the audience sure ain’t. I counted one chuckle amongst the crowd during my matinee, at a fart noise. Comedy lives?

If Jackson’s performance is a hopeful reflection of how we’re meant to feel, Reynolds is the realisation of our true feelings; namely boredom and resignation. That’s to say nothing of Elodie Yung and Salma Hayek (as Kincaid’s imprisoned wife). Come on, people, it’s 2017, is it really too much to ask that roles for women offer them more than to be sexually objectified (Hayek), to be rescued from fights with out-of-shape men that their character should easily be able to defeat (Yung), or just plain forgotten for entire acts of the movie (see both)?

When the film’s not saddling its women with perplexing double-agent plot threads or giggling along with the chummy antics of the central duo, it displays some genuinely respectable action sequences. A bike ‘n’ boat chase through Amsterdam packs a wallop, but it’s like someone airlifted a separate production crew in to film it. The shooty-stabby brawls elsewhere in the movie are efficiently swift, but the ruthlessness of the gore is never quite reconciled by the one-liners. There’s barely even a Nice Guys-style pause from Reynolds to pale at the carnage accrued by his client, and his reactions to Jackson’s guffawing amount to little more than parental exasperation.

Anyone paying a modicum of attention knows where Kincaid and Bryce’s relationship is heading, but just to make sure, the movie deploys heavy-handed musical cues at every possible moment to light our way. If it’s not through Atli Örvarsson’s sub-David Arnold score, it’s by calculated deployment of Foreigner’s I Want To Know What Love Is; a tactic which proved the final straw for me. Granted, not for the reason it’ll irk many people (I actually like the track, despite its place in the eighties soft rock canon I wish would disappear from pop culture for five seconds), but it’s still unearned and – like the endless CGI blood splatter – extravagantly cheap.

Saturday, 8 February 2014

'Robocop' - Review

2/08/2014 02:27:00 am
'Robocop' - Review


When news, on-set photos and trailers finally emerged about the remake of RoboCop, Paul Verhoevens 1987 action flick about a debilitated police officer consigned to a robotic suit, you could practically feel waves of cynicism emanating from the internet. The issue with remaking this film is pretty much the same faced by 2012’s Total Recall: it’s a big budget eighties action movie that was massively successful and has gone on to become regarded as a classic. The difference is that whilst Total Recall (the remake) tried too much to change the formula of the story (Mars was replaced with Australia), the trailers and promotional material seemed to denote that RoboCop was merely an updating of the original story with CG effects and contemporary actors.

Considering the less than friendly response to the news of the new movie (I can’t deny being very sceptical at first), plus the fairly mediocre trailer, it’s a great relief to say that the remake is actually very well done. The main moral issue that was briefly raised in the original but sank beneath the brash action set-pieces is brought back to the forefront in this version, best exemplified in a startlingly bleak sequence in which detective Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman) is shown the full extent of his transformation into the Robocop suit by Dr. Norton (Gary Oldman), unable to cope with his less than half human existence and asks Norton to end it.

The other political and moral issues concerning the ethics of keeping Murphy alive, the blurred lines between man and machine and the issue of technology as protection are all raised in their own distinct ways, the former two being played out between Oldman’s character and Sellars, the owner of Omnicorp (Michael Keaton giving his best shot at a morally suspect, moustache-twirling villain), and the latter brought to the forefront by Samuel L. Jackson as a Fox News style presenter in a series of propaganda-like news reports, claiming that America is ‘Robophobic’ and presses the case for America to exploit its drone technology from the Middle East on home soil (rather symbolic considering the controversy surrounding the real-life use of such drones by the US Army in its overseas operations).

As for the action sequences, the main selling point for most people, they’re fairly well executed, packing a great punch in terms of sound design and visual effects, the use of handheld cam placing the audience in the thick of the fight, although it should be noted that this handheld element does find its way, rather distractingly, into the much more quiet, intimate scenes involving Murphy’s wife Clara (Abbie Cornish) and son (John Paul Ruttan). This may be an attempt to liven up these small vignettes as the acting by Cornish is a little uninspiring and the brief moment she shares with her husband before his accident seems fairly rushed. This means investment in their relationship is a little on the light side, and the family drama supposedly at the heart of the story seems like a sideshow in comparison to the much more interesting scenes between Murphy and Norton, the latter played sublimely by Oldman, who seems to only improve with age.

So on the whole, RoboCop may lack the family drama we were promised and some of the acting is less than impressive, but the perfectly fine, nuts and bolts actions sequences are up there with the original and the moral/political issues at its heart are still relevant and hold their own amongst the other elements of the story. A worthy remake, but a fairly functional film on its own.

3.5 Stars