Chris At The Pictures: michael keaton
Showing posts with label michael keaton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label michael keaton. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 September 2017

'American Assassin' - Review

9/14/2017 05:47:00 pm 0
'American Assassin' - Review

★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

A charmless Dylan O’Brien takes the lead in this callous thriller which may as well be titled Toxic Masculinity: The Movie. He stars as Mitch Rapp, a young-ish man on the warpath for those who shot his girlfriend dead on a beach in Ibiza. His attempts to connect with vaguely-defined Muslim terror groups catch the attention of the CIA, and he’s brought in to face brutal training at the hands of no-nonsense Stan Hurley (Michael Keaton, just about managing not to nod off).

I’ve no idea how much of the plot has carries over verbatim from Vince Flynn’s 2010 source novel, but the opening massacre on a Mediterranean beach, a shootout in a crowded market and a subplot involving the threat of nuclear war couldn’t be more politically insensitive and exploitative if they tried.

The many scenes of cruelty are classified by the BBFC as ‘sadistic’, and believe me, that’s a generous appraisal. Not merely content with the customary CG splatter, American Assassin delights in looming, lingering shots of civilians and gunmen alike screaming, choking on blood and clutching hideous exit wounds. Women are usually victims of the nastier killings, the most distasteful offence occurring when Mitch follows a lead back to his luxury hotel. The businessman’s mistress wanders around topless for a few moments before getting cut down in the crossfire.

I don’t want to get on some moral high horse about this, but the kind of message the film sends through its constant depiction of shooting and stabbing as the quickest solution to any problem is troubling, and doubly uncomfortable when we consider that the whole reason for our hero's fractured psyche is exposure to horrific bloodshed. Stan’s cruel boot camp only serves to enhance the young man’s thirst for barbarity, and the only character who displays the slightest hint of pity is soon revealed to be minimally untrustworthy. Mitch immediately attempts to drown them in a bathtub.

Look: I’ve enjoyed a bunch of movies with as much – if not more – violence than this. Gareth Evan’s The Raid and its sequel are two of my favourite movies. But whereas they bring technical elegance, an empathetic lead, winning composition and threatening villains, Michael Cuesta's effort offers only the exhibition of a perfectly-manicured white man carving his way through faceless foreigners.

And that’s all Dylan O’Brien really brings to the role: eternally-windswept hair and skinny jeans in place of a personality. His eventual antagonist, appearing in the form of Taylor ‘glad to be working’ Kitsch, is equally laughable. During their final confrontation, the two trade blows and stagger around a small room. Both sport short, untidy facial hair, black slim-fit shirts and identical accents. In shots where O’Brien’s fluffier hairdo is out of frame, the two are genuinely indistinguishable, reducing what should be a nail-biting climax upon which the fate of the world rests to a pair of Hollister models having a special cuddle.

Wednesday, 5 July 2017

'Spider-Man: Homecoming' - Review

7/05/2017 05:33:00 pm
'Spider-Man: Homecoming' - Review
 
★ ★ ★ ½ ☆

“Not another Spider-Man reboot!” I hear you moan, as the third iteration of the wall-crawler in a decade (now played by young British star, Tom Holland) gains his first lone outing. I totally sympathise. The apprehension that the character has been wrung dry by Sony/Marvel in such a short time is understandable, but surprisingly baseless here. If anything, the previous versions have been a blessing: audiences are now so familiar with Peter Parker’s origins that Marvel Studios, having wrapped the character in the warm embrace of their Cinematic Universe (hence the dual-interpretation of Homecoming), take the chance to cover new ground.

We catch up with Spidey fresh from his tussle with the Avengers in Captain America: Civil War, but now facing possibly a greater challenge: sophomore year of high school. Fawning over fellow whizz-kid, Liz (Laura Harrier) and feeling rejected by Tony Stark (a short appearance by Robert Downey Jr.), our teen in tights finds it hard enough balancing heroism with hormones. The arrival of Michael Keaton’s Vulture (a disgruntled hoarder of the tech left behind after various super-sized scuffles) serves only to tear Peter’s allegiances between his worried Aunt May (Marisa Tomei), his schoolfriends and his promise to Stark yet further.

Homecoming drops the rather operatic tone of the Raimi movies (and whatever mode of address the Marc Webb duo was going for), adopting something more homogenous within the wider MCU (read: breezy, quippy, plenty of explosions). Those labelling it a John Hughes-style teen movie are probably still arguing that The Winter Soldier was a Cold War thriller. Nevertheless, the smaller stakes and tighter focus allow this to stand out, if briefly. There’s a smidgeon too much banging and clattering towards the end (what else is new?), but that’s redeemed by a pursuit of character development and moral lessons over empty spectacle.

We’re not talking the usual city-levelling humdrum so blindingly avoided by Civil War, but something comprehensible, comedic and (most importantly) personal. Holland’s Spider-Man is one more likely to knock over a mailbox than a multi-storey, who apologises for the slightest calamity and is genuinely doing what he does to make people’s lives better. Stark’s plea for Peter to remain a “friendly, neighbourhood Spider-Man” is one we sympathise with not because we want him to lie low, but because we’d hate for him to get hurt. My point of comparison for Holland as the web-head is neither Tobey Maguire’s dorky bumbling, nor Andrew Garfield’s misjudged angst, but Gal Gadot’s endearing sincerity as Wonder Woman.

The remaining cast are an amiably diverse bunch (considering the population density and cultural mix of contemporary New York, a sea of white is neither progressive nor factually accurate), including a great turn from Jacob Batalon as Peter’s roommate, Ned, and a short but winning role for Zendaya as snarky classmate Michelle. Keaton – batting aside the countless Birdman jokes with enormous CG wing-blades – is gamely gravelly.

Michael Giacchino’s score isn’t much to write home about, a hugely entertaining revamp of Paul Webster and Robert Harris’ Spider-Man cartoon theme being the rare exception. Once he’s done with War for the Planet of the Apes, can we collectively ask Hollywood to give him a break? I’m a huge fan of his music, but with 11 scores under his belt in less than three years, I worry they’re overworking him. His compositions are the only element of Homecoming that raise the law of diminishing returns, lacking the sheer epic quality of Elfman or the late James Horner’s emotional wallop.

Much like Deadpool for 20th Century Fox, this solo jaunt amounts to little more than a breath-freshener for the MCU. It’s a much-needed step back from overwhelming ensemble casts and endless digital vistas, delivering a story that revels in simplicity, morality and comedy. Now, if you’ll join me for a musical finale, to the tune of the original Spider-Man theme. Altogether, now…

Spider-Man
Homecoming
Does whatever a soft reboot should
Tells a tale, small of scale
Lots of laughs, lots of heart
Enjoy! It's a whole bunch o' fuuuuun


(Sorry)

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

'Birdman' - Review

1/06/2015 10:22:00 pm
'Birdman' - Review
Birdman – leading the pack at the forthcoming awards season – has finally reached the shores of the UK. From director Alejandro González Iñárritu (whose remarkable debut feature Amores Perros was my gateway to world cinema) comes the story of Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton), an aging actor determined to put his history of mega-budget superhero films behind him and return to the public sphere by adapting and starring in a play by Raymond Carver. As he attempts to put his life back together, his invisible alter-ego (the titular Birdman) constantly spouts abuse inside his head, driving him towards his goal with renewed fervour.

Whilst everyone else has been falling over themselves congratulating Iñárritu on the casting of ex-Batman Keaton in the lead role – a rather unsubtle joke – I’d like to use this opportunity to praise almost everybody else in the ensemble cast. True, Keaton is given more to do than he has been in years, but he’s no revelation: that praise should be re-directed towards Emma Stone as Riggan’s post-rehab daughter who oozes talent throughout, as does Lindsay Duncan as a scathing arts critic determined to bring Thomson’s world down. Zach Galifianakis is at long last given a serious role and Naomi Watts is rescued from the recent shame of Diana in a role more befitting of her unplumbed talent.


Cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki finally fulfils the fantasy that Gravity could only dream of, with almost the entire film bearing the appearance of one continuous shot that flawlessly transitions from scene to scene. You can keep your eyes peeled for the seams, but you won’t find them: you’ll be too busy jogging your knee up and down to Antonio Sanchez’s jumbled drum score (a lyrical reflection of Riggan’s own confused headspace) and transfixed by Keaton and his cohorts traversing the neon-stained caverns of Broadway.


From the jibes taken at the current string of comic book movies (Birdman most notably sporting a Christian Bale-esque gravelly voice) to the battle between theatre and cinema, Birdman is a film of mostly subtle comedy. True, some scenes of hysterical disagreement between Keaton and Ed Norton as the crazed method actor are played for audible laughs, but it’s the quieter hints at the superiority complex of theatre that works the real magic. If anything it’s refreshing to see an American comedy that isn’t populated with middle-aged men shouting very loudly at crude toilet humour, but a carefully constructed and intelligent film that is actually about something and accomplishes an entertaining climax… even if a clearly defined ending is inexplicably followed by fifteen minutes that really don’t work.

★★★★☆

Wednesday, 12 March 2014

'Need for Speed' - Review

3/12/2014 05:59:00 pm
'Need for Speed' - Review


Based on the popular video game franchise, Need for Speed follows the story of Tobey Marshall (Aaron Paul) as he seeks revenge after a fellow driver causes his friend to crash and leaves him to die in flames by the roadside. Along the way he enlists the help of his crew of mechanics and the daughter of a British car dealer Julia (Imogen Poots) to help clear his name and ensure that his nemesis Dino (Dominic Cooper) is brought to justice. 


The film is a fairly mixed bag to say the least. There’s a moment very early on in which a character says ‘You know I just came up with that, right now?’, and this is indicative of the movie in general. There are several set pieces that seem to have been drawn out of thin air, added entirely to either pad out the run time or to pull in an audience eager for more. Whatever the reason, the action sequences are carried out with a great deal of finesse and are perhaps the film’s greatest strength. They harken back to a time when action movies prided themselves on doing dangerous stunts for real, and there is homage paid to Bullit and Speed, both in one of the out-of-nowhere driving sequences and in a short drive-in scene.

The real stunts, combined with clever use of varying camera types and angles plus a full-blooded, pounding score by Nathan Furst (a newcomer for me, but someone I’ll be keeping an eye on) ensure that there are several moments where you worry that vehicles and people are genuinely being badly broken. There is also a lot to be said for Aaron Paul, now fresh out of his magnificent run in Breaking Bad, who takes a slightly flimsy script and manages to pull off a very fine performance. 

Imogen poots does the best she can with what she’s given, though since her appearance in last year’s Filth she has taken a step backwards, performance wise. The cinematography is handled with a certain degree of panache, though the retro-fitted 3D adds little to the film, and is unable to save the mostly one-dimensional delivery of lines by the supporting cast, one of whom swings from simply annoying to a little misogynistic, the others (including a previous offender of Michael Bay’s oeuvre) simply feeling like screen filler. 

Need for Speed is a perfectly fine action movie that sets out with good intentions, has a troubled first half, but pulls it all together before the end, and I’d be lying if I said I hadn’t enjoyed myself. Let’s just hope they don’t ruin the goodwill with a sequel.

3 Stars

Saturday, 8 February 2014

'Robocop' - Review

2/08/2014 02:27:00 am
'Robocop' - Review


When news, on-set photos and trailers finally emerged about the remake of RoboCop, Paul Verhoevens 1987 action flick about a debilitated police officer consigned to a robotic suit, you could practically feel waves of cynicism emanating from the internet. The issue with remaking this film is pretty much the same faced by 2012’s Total Recall: it’s a big budget eighties action movie that was massively successful and has gone on to become regarded as a classic. The difference is that whilst Total Recall (the remake) tried too much to change the formula of the story (Mars was replaced with Australia), the trailers and promotional material seemed to denote that RoboCop was merely an updating of the original story with CG effects and contemporary actors.

Considering the less than friendly response to the news of the new movie (I can’t deny being very sceptical at first), plus the fairly mediocre trailer, it’s a great relief to say that the remake is actually very well done. The main moral issue that was briefly raised in the original but sank beneath the brash action set-pieces is brought back to the forefront in this version, best exemplified in a startlingly bleak sequence in which detective Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman) is shown the full extent of his transformation into the Robocop suit by Dr. Norton (Gary Oldman), unable to cope with his less than half human existence and asks Norton to end it.

The other political and moral issues concerning the ethics of keeping Murphy alive, the blurred lines between man and machine and the issue of technology as protection are all raised in their own distinct ways, the former two being played out between Oldman’s character and Sellars, the owner of Omnicorp (Michael Keaton giving his best shot at a morally suspect, moustache-twirling villain), and the latter brought to the forefront by Samuel L. Jackson as a Fox News style presenter in a series of propaganda-like news reports, claiming that America is ‘Robophobic’ and presses the case for America to exploit its drone technology from the Middle East on home soil (rather symbolic considering the controversy surrounding the real-life use of such drones by the US Army in its overseas operations).

As for the action sequences, the main selling point for most people, they’re fairly well executed, packing a great punch in terms of sound design and visual effects, the use of handheld cam placing the audience in the thick of the fight, although it should be noted that this handheld element does find its way, rather distractingly, into the much more quiet, intimate scenes involving Murphy’s wife Clara (Abbie Cornish) and son (John Paul Ruttan). This may be an attempt to liven up these small vignettes as the acting by Cornish is a little uninspiring and the brief moment she shares with her husband before his accident seems fairly rushed. This means investment in their relationship is a little on the light side, and the family drama supposedly at the heart of the story seems like a sideshow in comparison to the much more interesting scenes between Murphy and Norton, the latter played sublimely by Oldman, who seems to only improve with age.

So on the whole, RoboCop may lack the family drama we were promised and some of the acting is less than impressive, but the perfectly fine, nuts and bolts actions sequences are up there with the original and the moral/political issues at its heart are still relevant and hold their own amongst the other elements of the story. A worthy remake, but a fairly functional film on its own.

3.5 Stars