Chris At The Pictures: alejandro gonzalez inarritu
Showing posts with label alejandro gonzalez inarritu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alejandro gonzalez inarritu. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

'The Revenant' - Review

1/19/2016 06:33:00 pm
'The Revenant' - Review

★ ★ ★ ½ ☆

Our constant companion throughout The Revenant (Alejandro González Iñàrritu’s tale of a left-for-dead frontiersman) is the harsh, wounded breathing of Leonardo DiCaprio’s Hugh Glass. Mutilated in a savage bear attack and abandoned by rival and fellow pelt-hauler John Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy), Glass begins an odyssey across the frozen wastes of the West, seeking vengeance. 

The recurring motif of Glass rising after yet another rough night under the stars perfectly encapsulates the strengths and weaknesses of the film. Despite the baggage of gobsmacking on-set reports and Oscar fever, DiCaprio’s performance is startlingly captivating, often rendering one of Hollywood’s most famous faces unrecognisable behind a beard matted with blood, mud and snot. As reluctant as I am to cave to award voters’ fawning for transformative performances, there’s no denial that this portrayal is anything less than sublime. For what must constitute 80% of the run-time, Leo crawls, chokes and chews his way across stunning landscapes, at once distracting from and contributing to the savage backdrop. 

And what extraordinary savagery it is, too: not since Gareth Evan’s follow-up to The Raid has cinematic pain been so viscerally convincing. A heart-thumping battle sequence followed closely by the bear brawl set us off at a sprint before grinding to a gritty, grimy crawl. This is where the problem with our constant focus on Glass comes into play: a very grumpy man waking up in the woods can only be entertaining so many times, and the endless repetition of grumbling into scummy beard, crawling a few paces, sleeping in a horse carcass etc. drags the centre section of the film into a dangerous gutter. As with Iñàrritu’s Birdman, the twenty minutes that inspire much watch-checking and fidgeting is the clumsy ink smudge on an otherwise unsullied work.

Reference to the cinematic frame as a painting is also applicable to Emmanuel Lubezki’s cinematography. His usual penchant for long, winding takes is dotted about the piece, but far more impressive are the moments when the camera is allowed a moment of stillness, to take in exquisite vistas of looming mountain ranges and biting, jet-black rivers. Some compositions are so ingeniously striking that I’m certain no-one has ever imagined anything like them: take, for example, a shot that places us within wisps of cloud, reminded of our lofty position above and beyond Glass’s plight as he drifts between the rage of his waking hours or the calm lucidness of his recurring daydreams. 

I’m not entirely convinced that any of these surreal outcroppings actually have anything important to say about human nature and how far we are willing to go for the sake of survival, vengeance, or both, but as long as they’re so wondrously mounted, I’m quite happy to go the distance.

With DiCaprio’s much pined-for Oscar pretty much a dead cert at this point, recognition of other great turns in the film is massively lacking to the point of negligence. Hardy has sported roles like this before, and his overwrought southern accent distracts from the great supporting work being done by Domhnall Gleeson as Glass’s sympathetic superior officer. Will Poulter also does well in a role which finally allowed me to see more of his talent and less of his eyebrows. In the midst of a film so often obsessed with unwashed hair, soggy fur and torn fabrics, this is not something to be undervalued. For all the muscular violence, ice-cold tone and stark imagery, the character-driven elements of The Revenant are what push it above a mere endurance test and into the realm of warm-blooded, human storytelling.

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

'Birdman' - Review

1/06/2015 10:22:00 pm
'Birdman' - Review
Birdman – leading the pack at the forthcoming awards season – has finally reached the shores of the UK. From director Alejandro González Iñárritu (whose remarkable debut feature Amores Perros was my gateway to world cinema) comes the story of Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton), an aging actor determined to put his history of mega-budget superhero films behind him and return to the public sphere by adapting and starring in a play by Raymond Carver. As he attempts to put his life back together, his invisible alter-ego (the titular Birdman) constantly spouts abuse inside his head, driving him towards his goal with renewed fervour.

Whilst everyone else has been falling over themselves congratulating Iñárritu on the casting of ex-Batman Keaton in the lead role – a rather unsubtle joke – I’d like to use this opportunity to praise almost everybody else in the ensemble cast. True, Keaton is given more to do than he has been in years, but he’s no revelation: that praise should be re-directed towards Emma Stone as Riggan’s post-rehab daughter who oozes talent throughout, as does Lindsay Duncan as a scathing arts critic determined to bring Thomson’s world down. Zach Galifianakis is at long last given a serious role and Naomi Watts is rescued from the recent shame of Diana in a role more befitting of her unplumbed talent.


Cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki finally fulfils the fantasy that Gravity could only dream of, with almost the entire film bearing the appearance of one continuous shot that flawlessly transitions from scene to scene. You can keep your eyes peeled for the seams, but you won’t find them: you’ll be too busy jogging your knee up and down to Antonio Sanchez’s jumbled drum score (a lyrical reflection of Riggan’s own confused headspace) and transfixed by Keaton and his cohorts traversing the neon-stained caverns of Broadway.


From the jibes taken at the current string of comic book movies (Birdman most notably sporting a Christian Bale-esque gravelly voice) to the battle between theatre and cinema, Birdman is a film of mostly subtle comedy. True, some scenes of hysterical disagreement between Keaton and Ed Norton as the crazed method actor are played for audible laughs, but it’s the quieter hints at the superiority complex of theatre that works the real magic. If anything it’s refreshing to see an American comedy that isn’t populated with middle-aged men shouting very loudly at crude toilet humour, but a carefully constructed and intelligent film that is actually about something and accomplishes an entertaining climax… even if a clearly defined ending is inexplicably followed by fifteen minutes that really don’t work.

★★★★☆