Chris At The Pictures: crime
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 July 2018

'Sicario 2: Soldado' - Review

7/03/2018 02:33:00 pm 0
'Sicario 2: Soldado' - Review

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Picking up where 2015’s grim tale of murky morals on the Mexican border left off, this sequel finds itself squeezing every political pressure point within reach. Josh Brolin returns as CIA operative Matt Graver, tasked with initiating open warfare between the Mexican cartels to dissuade the smuggling of terrorists across the border. He again enlists the mysterious Alejandro (Benicio Del Toro), this time to kidnap a crime lord’s daughter (Isabela Moner) and thereby escalate the unrest: they're going to build a war and make Mexico pay for it.

With the triple-threat of helmsman Denis Villeneuve, cinematographer Roger Deakins and star Emily Blunt now absent, this descent into destruction loses all direction and grace, becoming - ironically - a rather blunt instrument. I didn’t think Sicario had a heart in the first place, but without Blunt’s Kate Macer as the moral anchor, Soldado becomes a one-way ticket to rock bottom for all parties involved. “Rules of engagement, sir?” asks a squadmate of Graver’s as they prepare for a stand-off. “Fuck it all”, comes the response.

Nowhere is the shrugging off of anything less dour than a Nietzschean tract more apparent than this moment, Graver having already dismissed POTUS as “cowardly” for not wanting to cause the destabilisation of a neighbouring country. Taylor Sheridan returns as screenwriter, and makes it his mission to push all the MAGA era buttons he can before someone pries his fingers from the typewriter. The film opens with Mexican immigrants swarming towards the border, ISIS suicide bombers concealed within their ranks. An entire subplot is dedicated to the training of a young Mexican trafficker (Elijah Rodriguez). Disturbingly realistic dramatisations of atrocities committed on American soil are delivered in clear detail while later images of Mexican children and parents boarding separate buses are casually, even callously dismissed before we move to more masculine brooding.

Sheridan still has problems writing women, too: Kate Macer may have been our way into Sicario, but her feminine traits were unsubtly coded as simply daring to have ideals in the first place, used only as a contrast to the more pragmatic Graver and the morally suspect Alejandro. In Soldado, the only women with substantial speaking roles are Catherine Keener as a hawk-like overseer, and Moner, who's (still magnetic) turn as political prisoner becomes little more than a device to draw out development for Alejandro and plot exposition from everyone else. Del Toro is a gripping presence, as one would expect, but Brolin - bereft of any challenger - simply stomps about with his chin forward.

Director Stefano Sollima (Suburra) is no stranger to underworld unrest, and his teaming up with d.o.p. Dariusz Wolski (Alien: Covenant) makes for some appropriately forbidding imagery. Everything’s either blistering desert sunlight or spotlit shadows, both colour-timed to whichever shade of grey fits the current philosophical mood. Soldado’s nihilism, however (largely displayed in explosive but uninvolving action scenes), becomes wearing all too soon. An epilogue that further hammers home this franchise’s Gospel of Matthew, “violence begets more violence” message offers no solution to its central conflict, nor to the real-life horrors it purports to represent.

Wednesday, 14 March 2018

'Gringo' - Review

3/14/2018 07:37:00 pm 0
'Gringo' - Review

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Laughs are sparse and the plot’s a farce in this occasionally funny but largely overstuffed caper from Nash Edgerton. David Oyelowo stars as Harold Soyinka, a hapless corporate underdog whose attempt to get back at his obnoxious boss, Richard (Joel Edgerton), by faking his own kidnapping by the Mexican cartel goes wrong.

A simple and perfectly workable setup (disgruntled employee hatches ridiculous plan) soon becomes an odyssey involving not only the cartels but a botched drug deal, a young couple caught in the middle (Harry Treadaway and Amanda Seyfried), a corrupt boss, adultery back home, and corporate espionage. For a labyrinthine spy thriller: great. In terms of keeping a self-billed comedy afloat: very unhelpful.

Almost as unhelpful is the film’s depiction and utilisation of Mexico and it’s culture. It’s all Day of the Dead celebrations, shady bars, drug running and the aforementioned cartels, or simply a foundation for useful - and highly misleading - marketing materials (the poster is plastered with various flowered skulls and similar paraphernalia). The image painted by said posters and the snappy trailer sets the audience up for a laugh-a-minute romp, but in fact the laughter comes dotted across vast deserts of joyless meandering. The one good piece of slapstick (Sharlto Copley’s bearded spy being knocked into a roly-poly by a car) is in the trailer, and the remaining violence is too efficiently brutal, too truly nasty to be in any way amusing. 

And, stuck helplessly in the middle of everything, is Oyelowo. That he’s been given the lead role in a mainstream American comedy should be cause for celebration (even more so when he gets to use his native Nigerian accent), but it’s a piece of casting that puts his powers to little use. His unshakable aura of intelligence betrays any attempt to portray Harold sincerely, but his natural charisma stays the course during all-too-brief scenes of character-building between the clueless stooge and Seyfried’s beaming holidaymaker.

The film is completely stolen from under all of them by Charlize Theron as Edgerton’s number two, a shy and sultry businesswoman with a penchant for loose shirts and cutting insults. Think Cruella de
Vil with a pixie cut. Her quest to toss aside the many useless men makes for some entertaining payoff once the countless convoluted threads come together, but it’s too little too late. 

Saturday, 10 March 2018

'Game Night' - Review

3/10/2018 10:04:00 am 0
'Game Night' - Review

★ ★ ★ ½ ☆

Hanging amiably in the balance between Paul Feig and Edgar Wright, this action comedy from the team behind Horrible Bosses (directors John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein) delivers on its premise with panache and laugh-a-minute gags. Jason Bateman and Rachel McAdams play Max and Annie, a couple who hold regular ‘game nights’ with their friends, all-the-while spurning the self-invitations of creepy cop neighbour, Gary (Jesse Plemons, gurning to perfection). When Max’s brother, Brooks (Kyle Chandler), all fast cars and fancy houses with the mannerisms of a movie trailer narrator appears, Max’s masculinity and sperm mobility (he and Annie are trying in vain for a baby) are threatened. In what seems another effort to outshine his younger brother, Brooks devises his own game night, inviting Max, Annie and their four friends (Lamorne Morris and Kylie Bunbury as a bickering couple, plus Billy Magnussen as Max’s inept pal, who brings along his date, played by Catastrophe’s Sharon Horgan). His promise of a hyperreal, Taken-style scenario goes horribly awry when it appears that an actual kidnapping takes place before the assembled yuppies’ very eyes.

What follows is a surprisingly inventive and raucous affair, as the three couples are left to decipher clues left behind by the kidnappers and fix their various scuffles. Bateman (at his deadpan best) and McAdam’s (on gleefully over-excitable form) adventure includes some light poking fun at performative masculinity and the usual non-committal dithering of a soon-to-be father, while Morris and Bunbury work through their characters’ past lapses in marital loyalty. Magnussen and Horgan are the purely comical duo: he’s an idiot showing her off as proof he can date someone smarter than his usual Instagram-obsessed former lovers, and she’s having none of it. Sliding smarmily in from the side-lines is Plemons, who barely has to shift a facial muscle to elicit snickering.

Mark Perez’ script draws out the best his cast have to offer and skimps on the off-the-cuff stylings that have regrettably become the standard in big screen American comedy. Torturously prolonged improv displays are largely dropped or at least cut short in favour of proper, scripted setups and payoffs that arrive in clever physical gags (the BBFC warning for ‘injury detail’ has never been lived up to with such hilarity), perfectly-pitched awkward interplay and acerbic quips that provide everything from a wry grin to full-on belly laughs. Ensure any food or drink items are a safe distance away during an extended joke involving the contents of Magnussen’s wallet and an all-too-brief appearance by Brooklyn Nine-Nine’s Chelsea Peretti.

That the film provides a steady stream of laughter is no mean feat, but is even more impressive when wedded effectively to formal ability. Variations of colour-grading, lighting techniques and camera movements in a movie of this type are so rare that even basic displays of technical prowess are a welcome surprise, not to mention CG-free car chases and even a ‘one-take’ fight sequence through a manor house. Sure, it’s no Atomic Blonde staircase brawl, but - along with a neat tilt-shift effect during establishing shots which transform the city streets and parking lots into game boards - it all adds up to a refreshing attempt at a visual identity that comedies rarely bother, let alone strive for in earnest. Composer Cliff Martinez (Drive) is even drafted in to provide a skippy synth score to further swell the film’s slick action credentials.

Said manor house set piece towards the climax is one spot where the overblown game threatens to become more bored than board, and the plot threads begin to pull together with an all-too-familiar sense that we’ve played this one before (gee, I wonder if Max will emerge less threatened by his brother after all?). You’ll forgive - and likely forget - these minor crimes: sheer volume of laughter makes a very convincing ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card.

Thursday, 11 May 2017

'Sleepless' - Review

5/11/2017 12:18:00 pm
'Sleepless' - Review


★ ★ ½ ☆ 


The second of this month’s films with an ill-advised and easily mocked title is this middle-of-the-road thriller remake starring Jamie Foxx. Based upon the moderately acclaimed Nuit Blanche¸ Sleepless sees deep cover cop Vincent Downs (Foxx) scouring a Las Vegas hotel in search of his kidnapped son after a drugs theft goes awry. The highly-coveted hoard sees Downs caught between two criminal big shots (Dermot Mulroney and Scoot McNairy) and pursued by plucky internal affairs officer Bryant (Michelle Monaghan).

Foxx gives a very toothy performance here; lots of spitting, gritting and grimacing. Far from the adrenaline-fuelled fear of losing his son, Foxx appears to be in desperate need of root canal. None of that can take away from the fact that we’ve seen him give far better performances in similar fare (and similar roles, come to that), and this inherent goodwill is what ignites the merest semblance of interest in Downs’ story.

Said narrative is bookended efficiently enough (the opening sequence and final showdown are uncomplicated and tightly constructed), but everything in-between is dragged down by more subplots than is good for any thriller. Corruption, double-crosses, underlying father-son troubles; it’s all here. One imagines the filmmakers have pretentions towards something in the vein of Denis Villeneuve’s Sicario, having given the film a faux-Johan Johansson score and a female lead on the tail of corruption, but both fall flat. The music is overbearing in the extreme, and though we’re undeniably more interested in what Monaghan’s getting up to, her character is written laughably thin.

Equally two-dimensional but substantially more fun is McNairy and his array of ball-themed threats. In his quest to appear scary, his slimy baddie employs golf, baseball, human testicles and an oversized grenade launcher that releases huge clouds of white…well, you get the idea.


The other performances aren’t exactly bad, they’re just sort of…there. A single exception is made for Gabrielle Union as Downs’ estranged wife, who is resoundingly poor. Still, the cinematography’s not half bad, while an unnecessary sequel setup raises a titter over an eye-roll. The whole thing seemed to go down rather well with an audience seeking a breather between space-bound superheroes and boss babies.

Saturday, 18 February 2017

'John Wick: Chapter 2' - Review

2/18/2017 12:36:00 am
'John Wick: Chapter 2' - Review

★ ★ ★ ★ 

For just one moment in John Wick: Chapter 2, Keanu Reeves looks old. Years of internet memes have tried to convince us that the Point Break star has barely aged a jot in almost two decades, but a tiny instant of greying vulnerability is what sells the story to come and prevents the Keanaissance from becoming a Keanuisance. Ex master assassin, John Wick, sits wearily on the edge of his bed, replaying the same video of his deceased wife from the first film, convinced that he’s finally escaped the clutches of self-destruction. But then an incendiary grenade lands in his living room, and any chance of retirement is quickly vaporised. A higher-up in the assassin’s organisation (Riccardo Scamarcio on perfectly slimy form) delivers a fight-or-flight ultimatum, and Wick is resigned to step back into hell, perhaps for good.

Every bit of behind-the-scenes reasoning for this film appears to be “Because it’s cool!”, whether it’s an extended gunfight in a swirling hall of mirrors, Laurence Fishburne as the head of a homeless spy network or Wick bracing his rifle against an injured opponent’s chest so he can reload. But I think it’s clear that director Chad Stahelski is far more practical than that. His roots in stunt co-ordination lend the film a formal construction that is conservative but never cold, a blend of efficient narrative and burning neon visuals. The result can only come from someone who understands gunplay, understands choreography, and – most importantly – understands what’s so entertaining about both.

The opening shot makes an unabashed reference to Buster Keaton and the wonderful physicality and comedy of silent cinema, and these qualities are revisited time and again as the film progresses. A punch-up between Wick and rival hitman Cassian (a fantastically brusque Common) leads to much tumbling down concrete steps, at once thuddingly felt and smirk-inducing. A later sequence sees the trademark display of firearm accuracy give way to two duellists taking po-faced pot-shots at each other to the complete ignorance of the crowd between them. The dialogue, too, is still played with a knowing straight face, and writer Derek Kolstad retains those lovely "Oh sh*t" moments when a baddie finds out who’s coming for them. Plus, if you thought Q from the James Bond movies would be far more entertaining as a grinning gun fetishist, this movie’s got you covered.

Understandably, the brutality of Wick’s descent back into the underworld has drawn many comparisons to the head-crunching action of Gareth Evans’ The Raid and its sequel. A valid connection to make, though there is a marked difference: if the Raid movies are a ballet, the John Wick series is a disco. They’re perhaps less refined and more accessible, but easily every bit as eye-wateringly magnetic. And what a bankable DJ Keanu Reeves is. It’s so hard to believe the force of nature who begins the movie punching goons with his car is the same piece of balsa wood who bored us to death in The Matrix sequels. I'm convinced the real Keanu was cryogenically frozen by a clone for 15 years and now he's out, taking revenge on bad movies by starring in The Neon Demon and John Wick but forcing the duplicate to take things like Knock Knock.


It’s just so good to see him back playing an actual character, rather than the plaything of Eli Roth’s gross misjudgement or a mouthpiece for the Wachowski’s philosophical mumbo-jumbo. I actually found myself asking questions in the midst of full-blown firefights. Why is John so swift to re-enter the fray? Is he addicted? It is a reflex action? Can he ever truly retire? Did he just stab that man in his Mr. Happy? These are all very similar to questions we’ve been asking since the first film (and we may have to wait a couple of years for some answers), but they’re no less engaging. There are attempts to expand the mythology of the world (admirable but unsuccessful, as they upset the pacing), but John Wick: Chapter 2 works best when totally focused on its anti-hero; asking us to pity him as he frees someone’s stomach from their midsection with an expertly-placed shotgun blast. 

Saturday, 22 October 2016

'The Girl on the Train ' - Review

10/22/2016 10:09:00 pm
'The Girl on the Train ' - Review

★ ★ ★ ½ 

Emily Blunt rescues this pulpy whodunit from its more clunky moments with a remarkable central performance. She stars as Rachel; an unemployed, alcoholic divorcee who – on her daily train journey to nowhere – catches a glimpse of a woman she’s watched from the tracks many times before. Only this time, she’s kissing a man who isn’t her husband. When the woman, Megan, goes missing, Rachel becomes entangled in the investigation, much to the concern and suspicion of her ex-husband, Tom (Justin Theroux), and his new wife, Anna (Rebecca Ferguson).

For the first time in an age, I came to this adaptation having actually read the source novel. Paula Hawkins’ potboiler – relying so much on the written thoughts of its three central characters – does not immediately scream ‘movie magic’, but the way in which the main narrative hangs on a single image (Megan and her mysterious lover seen through the window of a speeding train) is decidedly cinematic.

When attempting to picture the morose, eternally-intoxicated and allegedly unalluring Rachel, the visage of Emily Blunt does not immediately spring to mind. However, there is so much conviction in her voice and a real effort to tone down the Hollywood glamour that the whole façade is surprisingly effective, thanks not least to some subtle but effective make-up and prosthetics.

While Blunt’s casting may have raised objections and quizzical responses, the secondary characters are an array of undoubtedly excellent casting choices. The master stroke is Luke Evans as Scott, Megan’s skittish husband. Evans’ earnest vocal inflections speak to Scott’s sincerity, but his bulky, somewhat thuggish physicality ensures he remains a prime suspect. Edgar Ramírez carries a similar disposition as Megan’s therapist, Kamal Abdic, while Ferguson acts everyone else off the screen with eyes that are simultaneously burning but restrained.

It’s amazing how little is lost in the commute from page to screen. The largest alteration is the move from Britain to the US, but Blunt retains her accent (a conscious effort, one imagines, to make the transition smoother). The lack of an internal monologue (save for small spats of necessary narration) is hardly felt, and the slightly episodic feel slowly oozes away as the flashbacks become less frequent. There are also some neat visual elements introduced, too: Rachel draws what she sees, rather than keeping a written diary, and a statue in the park towards the end reveals the tale’s true form. Not a crime thriller, not a mystery, but a story about the struggles of three women.

The cinematography itself is – there’s really no other word for it – cool. It’s an enticing, blue-grey affair that occasionally brings to mind Jeff Cronenweth’s work on Gone Girl, but remains grounded in Rachel’s story by employing ‘the drunk aesthetic’. Objects a certain distance from our heroine’s viewpoint become fuzzy, and jumpy editing emphasises the small moments lost in the process as she is buffeted about by onlookers and events alike.

Besides the many twists and turns of the story, perhaps the biggest surprise is a completely counterintuitive score from Danny Elfman, completely free of his idiosyncrasies but still supremely effective. Perhaps the fact that it’s so different from his usual style (a style that I readily admit became stale for me some time ago) makes me more inclined to praise it, but having listened to it separately since seeing the film, I strongly disagree.

While it’s not without some languor and a fair share of flimsy dialogue, The Girl on the Train is constructed with more than a little panache and keeps its focus securely locked onto the three women at the centre of the story. With a keen and unique technical approach, this is certainly a more praiseworthy and gripping experience than the extended Eastenders episode referred to by others.

Monday, 22 February 2016

'Triple 9' - Review

2/22/2016 09:47:00 pm
'Triple 9' - Review


★ ★ ½ ☆ 



At the time of writing this review it’s been three days since I saw Triple 9 and without the IMDB synopsis, the story would have all but slipped from my brain, which rather puts a dampener on a film with so much promise. Who could have predicted that John Hillcoat, director of The Road, could lead a diverse cast including Chiwetel Ejiofor, Anthony Mackie, Kate Winslet, Casey Affleck and Gal Gadot to such a flat-footed result?

The setup promoted by the punchy trailer seems simple enough: a group of corrupt cops and criminal associates need to complete one last job for a Russian crime lord (Kate Winslet). In order to clear the heist zone of police, they initiate a triple 9 – the death of a police officer that will draw the authorities away from the prize. But nothing is ever without complications, and restless Sergeant Allen (Woody Harrelson) recruits idealistic Chris (Casey Affleck) to confirm his suspicions of approaching threat.

All the individual elements that intimate new ideas seem to have sparked from someone on the production team saying “wouldn’t it be cool if…” rather than pooling ideas on what best serves the story. Take, for instance, Harrelson’s stars 'n’ stripes tie: a comment on the law restrained by state, perhaps? Or what of the explosion of red dye accompanying the introductory bank job: a likely problem during a getaway? In answer to both, no. They’re eye-catching tics with minimal substance. 

While any glimmers of originality are superficial at best, the remaining plot elements are visibly pinched from a plethora of distinguished crime thrillers: we get a mounting body count in the final stretch akin to The Departed, Mackie’s character gets a reversion of the criminal/cop guilt-trip from Point Break (though sadly bereft of the gun-toting moment Hot Fuzz parodied so well), and a roadside shootout of the Heat variety ensues with ear-bursting peal.

Michael Mann’s 1995 film is a clear influence throughout, not least the interpretation of the city as a secondary character: the various creatures of the night take second billing to forsaken back alleys and grubby car parks, whilst a frothy electronic score bubbles beneath the surface.

A fidgety approach to character development throughout means we’re never quite sure who to root for. Not due to any discreet suggestion of moral ambiguity, but simply because the best we get of any character is a mere thumbnail before leaping across town to the next. Affleck gets the most to work with as the clueless man of principle, but we’re left pining for more from Mackie’s corrupt cop or Winslet’s fabulous Irina. Seriously, why bother casting Kate Winslet as a cold-hearted Russian Mafioso if the best we get of her is a two-minute snapshot? And all the while, the usually incomparable Ejiofor is lost amongst the gravel.

The conclusion packs a bloody punch and brings sufficient resolution, but highlights the contrast with the ill-disciplined opening salvo. Triple 9 has so much potential on a piece-by-piece level that it’s impossible not to find some attraction, but the final model is clumsily constructed and wonkily mounted. For all the brute force in its gunplay, it barely leaves an exit wound.

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

'Spectre' - Review

10/27/2015 02:12:00 am
'Spectre' - Review


★ ★ ★ ½ 

Daniel Craig and Léa Seydoux charm their way through this thrilling – if flimsy – ‘Best of Bond’ highlight reel. 007’s world is under threat from the inside and out as intelligence higher-up Denbigh (Andrew Scott) promises to scrap the Double-0 programme, while the mysterious Spectre organisation and it’s enigmatic leader Franz Oberhauser (Christoph Waltz) is brought into the light.


If this is truly to be Craig’s final outing as Bond (one can never be too sure given the erratic nature of his recent press outings) then I can’t imagine we could have asked for better demonstration of his commitment to the role. Craig’s Bond has been visibly moulded by the events of the previous three films (yes, even Quantum of Solace!) while still keeping his rough-hewn, bulldog appeal in full effect. His better side is especially brought out during his scenes with Madeleine Swann (Seydoux), a sly and shining character who injects a healthy dose of complexity and depth to the Bond girl formula.


Christoph Waltz (even in movies that don’t deserve him) never half-arses a performance, and Spectre refuses to be the exception. He’s cool and calculating without simply forming a carbon copy of his character from Inglorious Basterds: Hans Landa had a twisted logic and code of ethics about him, but Oberhauser is classic, unswayable Bond baddie. The unravelling plot that falls upon his shoulders also does a very nice job of neatly tying together the story of Craig’s Bond so far (again, even Quantum of Solace factors into the equation without everything falling apart!).

Though the plot does well with pre-written material, the new machinations established along the way suffer from 2015’s rampant strain of over-complicated story threads, making the film feel stuffed even with 148 minutes in which to play. Age of Ultron, Rogue Nation and now Spectre feign complexity but in the end bring only confusion. Everything here moves along at such a wallop that there’s not much time to pause and think, but during those rare moments the whole thing threatens to fall in on itself.

The speed at which events transpire also has the undesired side effect of underusing talented players: Monica Belluci is treated almost as a throwaway, and Scott’s character (the butt of a very amusing running gag) appears far too little for my liking.

With characters well-played and the plot sturdy to a point, the rest resembles a greatest hits album of the Bond franchise, repackaged for a new generation: as well as a brand spanking new car chase, we get updated versions of The Spy Who Loved Me’s train fight, the Casino Royale torture scene plus an enlivening swig of snowbound On Her Majesty’s Secret Service antics. There’s little tinkering with the classic Bond formula even by composer Thomas Newman, who gives his best themes from Skyfall a winning surge of adrenaline while top-notch cinematography by Interstellar’s Hoyte Van Hoytema seals the deal. 

Sam Smith’s much-maligned title song also got a pass (dare I say even a recommendation) for weaving in nicely with both the score and the trademark opening titles. It feels like a genuine Bond theme as much as Mendes’ latest feels like a genuine 007 adventure, warts and all. Because there is a difference between a Bond film and a Bond film: Skyfall was the former, and Spectre wears the latter title loudly and proudly.

Saturday, 10 October 2015

'Sicario' - Review

10/10/2015 02:53:00 pm
'Sicario' - Review


★ ★ ½ ☆ 

Having lay awake half the night trying to figure out just why Sicario didn’t work for me in the same way it worked for apparently everyone else, I’ve still no luck in nailing it down, but I’ll try to explain myself before the sniper scopes of many an outraged critic take aim.

The latest from Denis Villeneuve (Prisoners, Enemy, and the upcoming sequel to Blade Runner), the film follows idealistic FBI agent Kate Macer (Emily Blunt) into the desert of distrust and despair. In the aftermath of a violent and horrific drug raid which sees her team decimated, Macer is enlisted by sandal-wearing CIA operative Matt Graver (Josh Brolin) to aid in the escalating war against Mexican border cartels, working alongside the inscrutable Alejandro (Benicio Del Toro).

If you’re going to sell your film as a ‘suspense thriller’, it might help to make good on that promise. I understand that we’re meant to be kept in the dark just as Macer is as she’s dragged deeper into the cesspit, but the threadbare nature of the dialogue and the tortuous reveal of information kept my investment at arm’s length. 

I hate myself for saying this, but the action sequences – excluding with feeling, the fantastic opening and ending – struck me as the high-budget equivalent of Paranormal Activity: there’s a lot of walking and talking with little dramatic verve until something goes ‘bang’ very loudly. Explosions, shady trades and one striking showdown in the bowels of an illegal border-crossing are far from lacklustre ingredients, but there’s a very fine line between a slow build and the construction workers turning up late.

I may be a tasteless moron in the eyes of several readers by now, but even I can appreciate the value of a good cast: Blunt is fiercely engaging and believably lost as the audience eye-view, and Del Toro is continuously fascinating in his role of the silent and enigmatic spook, whose spoiler-heavy arc prevents me from saying any more than that. I also grew a soft spot for Daniel Kaluuya as Macer’s number two, perhaps because he seems just as lost and irritated by the cloak-and-dagger politics as I was.

A perpetual mood of uncertainty is given great heft by Jóhann Jóhansson’s pulsating, windswept score while Roger Deakins’ cinematography takes the cake, delivering a stunning array of powerful imagery that speaks a dial louder than anything else in the film: the colour beige has never looked so good, every frame thick with artful symbolism.

As much as I went into this ready to sing my praise to the heavens, I can only be honest about a film that did so little for me. I have a major inkling Sicario will be something akin to 2001: A Space Odyssey or Blade Runner, both of which I now hold in huge regard: something for everyone else to rave about around my confounded ears until I give it another go a few years down the line, realise the error of my ways, and stop using my least favourite word: overrated.