Chris At The Pictures: woody harrelson
Showing posts with label woody harrelson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label woody harrelson. Show all posts

Thursday, 20 July 2017

'War for the Planet of the Apes' - Review

7/20/2017 05:09:00 pm
'War for the Planet of the Apes' - Review
 
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Matt Reeves’ concluding chapter to one of the finest series of the decade is a work of such staunch drama and allegory that a more apt title might be The Passion of the Apes. The film begins fifteen years after the first outbreak of the simian flu that all-but wiped out humanity and enhanced the intelligence of Earth’s ape population. What remains of mankind has become radicalised against their evolutionary superiors, whilst Caesar (the ever-incomparable Andy Serkis) still fights to retain peace for his kind. After an early encounter by a zealous Colonel (Woody Harrelson) the apes flee their hiding spot for pastures new. A vengeful Caesar, accompanied by the conscientious orangutan, Maurice, and a mute human girl they find along the way, heads for a final confrontation with the military.

For a title prefixed by War, there’s not a great deal of fighting in the film. The movie is bookended by an out-of-control ambush and sequences of snowbound devastation, but the central conflict is a psychological and ideological one. As the series has gained traction and trust with the audience, the spectacle has become muted, with the drama and (not always subtle) political-historical allusions taking centre stage. Even the script (which must reach less than a hundred lines in total) is hushed, with the apes communicating in sign language and Caesar having very little to say to his human foes. Any exposition is tucked into the opening titles, and it’s the haggard Harrelson that does most of the shouting. “So emotional!” an exclamation he screams at Caesar, and one that we echo upon leaving the cinema.

That this approach works for a modern audience at all speaks volumes about the previous films (Rupert Wyatt’s hearty Rise and Reeves’ own Dawn) and their ability to make an audience invest in a cast of not only animals, but entirely digital confections inhabiting a world also containing real humans. Caesar and the apes are not CG action figures placed at the forefront for mere fantastical thrills: they’re characters. As admirable as the efforts of Duncan Jones’ much under-appreciated Warcraft were in trying to forge a connection between us and the non-human Orcs, I never found myself thinking “I’d better not have to watch Durotan die with my own two eyes, I swear to god”. In War, this exact sentiment emerged constantly with regards to Maurice, Caesar and even Bad Ape, a new character played with impeccable energy and comic timing by Steve Zahn.

I know everyone's already made the comment about Serkis’ lack of awards to the point where it’s harder to find people who don’t think he deserves some kind of official recognition, but seriously, this is getting silly now. There are moments in War where Caesar’s face is so flawlessly rendered, so bristling with scars, matted hair and dried blood (and so close to the camera), one can practically feel his breath. There’s no pointy-pointy 3D (though the film is available in stereoscopic format), just years of painstaking technological development and an actor of such strength that his ferocity and anguish shine through layer-upon-layer of pixel power.

Caesar’s pain and regret are mainstays of the film (if you haven’t gathered thus far, this isn’t a bombastic romp of an action movie), and their resolution may feel a tad clichéd to some. It’s an easily forgivable misstep given everything else War has given us (empathetic characters, stunning visuals, jaw-dropping visual effects, considered pacing, emotional investment). Oh, and that stuff I said in my Spider-Man: Homecoming review about Michael Giacchino’s apparent fatigue of late? Forget it. His score for War contains maybe the most staggering cue he’s ever composed. 

The closing moments do tread a thin line between appropriate and predictable, but do so with grace and maturity, presenting a glorious finale that provides a bang (like Rise) and whimper (like Dawn) combo that, in the same magnificent instant, call to mind David Attenborough and David Lean. 

Monday, 22 February 2016

'Triple 9' - Review

2/22/2016 09:47:00 pm
'Triple 9' - Review


★ ★ ½ ☆ 



At the time of writing this review it’s been three days since I saw Triple 9 and without the IMDB synopsis, the story would have all but slipped from my brain, which rather puts a dampener on a film with so much promise. Who could have predicted that John Hillcoat, director of The Road, could lead a diverse cast including Chiwetel Ejiofor, Anthony Mackie, Kate Winslet, Casey Affleck and Gal Gadot to such a flat-footed result?

The setup promoted by the punchy trailer seems simple enough: a group of corrupt cops and criminal associates need to complete one last job for a Russian crime lord (Kate Winslet). In order to clear the heist zone of police, they initiate a triple 9 – the death of a police officer that will draw the authorities away from the prize. But nothing is ever without complications, and restless Sergeant Allen (Woody Harrelson) recruits idealistic Chris (Casey Affleck) to confirm his suspicions of approaching threat.

All the individual elements that intimate new ideas seem to have sparked from someone on the production team saying “wouldn’t it be cool if…” rather than pooling ideas on what best serves the story. Take, for instance, Harrelson’s stars 'n’ stripes tie: a comment on the law restrained by state, perhaps? Or what of the explosion of red dye accompanying the introductory bank job: a likely problem during a getaway? In answer to both, no. They’re eye-catching tics with minimal substance. 

While any glimmers of originality are superficial at best, the remaining plot elements are visibly pinched from a plethora of distinguished crime thrillers: we get a mounting body count in the final stretch akin to The Departed, Mackie’s character gets a reversion of the criminal/cop guilt-trip from Point Break (though sadly bereft of the gun-toting moment Hot Fuzz parodied so well), and a roadside shootout of the Heat variety ensues with ear-bursting peal.

Michael Mann’s 1995 film is a clear influence throughout, not least the interpretation of the city as a secondary character: the various creatures of the night take second billing to forsaken back alleys and grubby car parks, whilst a frothy electronic score bubbles beneath the surface.

A fidgety approach to character development throughout means we’re never quite sure who to root for. Not due to any discreet suggestion of moral ambiguity, but simply because the best we get of any character is a mere thumbnail before leaping across town to the next. Affleck gets the most to work with as the clueless man of principle, but we’re left pining for more from Mackie’s corrupt cop or Winslet’s fabulous Irina. Seriously, why bother casting Kate Winslet as a cold-hearted Russian Mafioso if the best we get of her is a two-minute snapshot? And all the while, the usually incomparable Ejiofor is lost amongst the gravel.

The conclusion packs a bloody punch and brings sufficient resolution, but highlights the contrast with the ill-disciplined opening salvo. Triple 9 has so much potential on a piece-by-piece level that it’s impossible not to find some attraction, but the final model is clumsily constructed and wonkily mounted. For all the brute force in its gunplay, it barely leaves an exit wound.

Thursday, 20 November 2014

'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' - Review

11/20/2014 04:52:00 pm 0
'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' - Review
Having failed to keep her head down and having escaped the second round of the Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) and her allies hunker down in the bowels of District 13, planning their revolution to topple the capitol, under the leadership of President Coin (Julianne Moore). With her home destroyed and fellow games-survivor Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) behind enemy lines, Katniss must decide whether or not to stand as the symbol of the revolution.

What gives Mockingjay Part 1 a slight edge over its predecessor is that the repetitive element of going back into the games is dropped and the story is able to move into a new direction, and it’s very impressive how the defiant spirit is alive and tangible now the oppressive aura of the games has lifted. With the exception of Philip Seymour Hoffman as Heavensbee (who spends the film slyly grinning from the side-lines as everything falls into place), everyone appears to be building towards something, ready to drop everything and give their life for the cause.


Jennifer Lawrence is spectacular, managing to still find new things to do with her role and proving to everyone why she remains the lauded face of the modern film star. The array of supporting cast all shine, notably Elizabeth Banks as Effie – who arguably is given greater room to develop than anyone else – and Sam Claflin as pretty-boy turned heartbroken rebel Finnick. Even the Josh Hutcherson problem of the previous films (that problem being that he couldn’t act his way out of a paper bag) is solved by the story itself not needing him very much.

Something I find admirable about this film in comparison to the previous movies is that – for what is essentially a teen action movie – it spends a majority of its time building characters, investing time in the unravelling of the plot and keeping the audience engrossed in the story, and even when the action sequences rear their head the CG and explosions are handled just as carefully and just as involving as the rest, even if the final set-piece is all over the shop.

Mockingjay is also a very important note in the Hunger Games series musically: James Newton Howard is finally given room to breathe outside the games arena, providing a powerful soundtrack that really deserves more attention than the ‘soundtrack’ currently topping the charts (basically a bunch of songs with the poster plastered over the album cover). There is also a central set piece involving a love song which really harkens back (albeit in a more populist form) to the punk-rock idea of music as a weapon of the revolution, to not only speak out against the oppressors but to belt out your dissatisfaction from the rooftops.


Willing to go to dark places, unafraid of injecting a little humour and unashamed when it comes to favouring emotions over effects, Mockingjay Part 1 may be laden with a few too many rousing speeches and a stumbling final act but it reaches furiously for the heights of its predecessor and falls but a degree short. If this is the opening salvo, fans and audiences alike have much to look forward to in the final chapter.

★★★★