Chris At The Pictures: jennifer lawrence
Showing posts with label jennifer lawrence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jennifer lawrence. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

'mother!' - Review

9/19/2017 10:29:00 pm 0
'mother!' - Review

★ ½ ☆ ☆ ☆

After the big budget blowout of Noah, Darren Aronofsky returns to simpler times with this deliberately provocative tale of a man and woman (Javier Bardem and Jennifer Lawrence, whose characters remain unnamed) living peaceful, but soon-to-be interrupted lives. Basking in their Eden-like seclusion, Lawrence’s eponymous matriarch sets about restoring the house (with which she shares a mysterious, organic connection), while Bardem plays a troubled poet looking to write his masterwork. Just as inspiration appears to strike, an unknown couple (Ed Harris and Michelle Pfeiffer) stumble upon the pair, bringing with them the unspoken threat of upset and destruction.

For all it’s unclear narrative strokes and ambiguous dialogue, mother! is not a subtle film. The instant it’s central metaphor takes root, it's nigh-on impossible to focus on anything else. The intended discomfort and tension as Harris and Pfeiffer encroach upon the couple’s handiwork is totally undermined by an allegory so ham-fisted you could slice it up and serve it in sandwiches.

That a film so steeped in parable and analogy is playing in multiplexes should be something to celebrate, making Aranofsky’s failure to combine symbolism with a compelling story that much more infuriating. The overriding thesis of the film – at least, as it was apparent to me – is one I sympathise with, but I can’t see it winning over the average movie-goer. As evidenced by the movie’s plummeting CinemaScore across the pond, they’re likely to remain resolutely alienated by a mood piece comprised mostly of Jennifer Lawrence gasping and shrieking at the camera.

To see Lawrence return to comparatively ‘out there’ cinema after her string of mainstream roles is an exciting prospect, and sadly remains just that: something still to come. Her role here (to use the word ‘character’ seems generous considering her deployment as reflection or caricature) gives us nothing but fear and loathing, of which she gave ample demonstration across all four instalments of the Hunger Games series.

Pfieffer tries to save what she can (largely through a particularly delicate method of sipping lemonade), but it’s a hopeless effort. She – along with Harris and brief spells from Dohmnall Gleeson and Kristen Wiig – becomes just another face in the crown of walking, talking emblems that slowly but surely begin to overwhelm the isolated abode.

This increasingly fraught and claustrophobic home-invasion section of the film is where things truly go to pot. In terms of pure technical construction, there should be much to admire as time, space and bodies fast-forward, tighten and twist in a finale clearly designed to shock and awe. The established composition of mother! (a repetitive, clumsy and dull array of close-ups and over-the-shoulder shots) instead consigns us to crock and bore.

Wednesday, 4 January 2017

'Passengers' - Review

1/04/2017 12:44:00 pm
'Passengers' - Review

 ★ ★  ☆

‘Infinite space, infinite terror’ screamed the poster for Paul W.S. Anderson’s cult sci-fi horror, Event Horizon. Whilst the endless void has supplied many a horrifying antagonist, Morten Tyldum’s new film offers neither acid-bleeding monsters nor iron-fisted galactic empires, but the simple passage of time. Chris Pratt stars as engineer Jim Preston, one of five-thousand passengers (roll credits) of the starship Avalon, your bog-standard ark-in-space vessel designed somewhere between a wind turbine and the Endurance ship from Interstellar, with the constant malfunctions of the TARDIS. One of these glitches raises Jim too early from a hypersleep to which he cannot return, leaving him with 90 years alone, and long dead before the Avalon reaches its destination.

After a year spent luxuriating in the more premium areas of the ship and pondering his plight with Michael Sheen’s legless robo-barman (see what they did there?), Jim forcibly awakens fellow passenger Aurora (Jennifer Lawrence) for company, knowing full well that he is denying her a future. The question soon becomes a matter of what will shatter the couple’s serene sham of a relationship first: Jim’s conscience or the multitude of problems plaguing the ship?

That all sounds very complex, but, essentially, it’s two very attractive people on a very attractive spaceship living a very attractive lifestyle surrounded by very attractive production design, backed by a very attractive score. Any intriguing or (god forbid) challenging ideas raised by the undeniably creepy premise are soon buried beneath the super-shiny surface. It’s a shame, because Tyldum’s dealt with somewhat subversive material before (the outright nastiness of Headhunters and the more morally difficult areas of The Imitation Game) and come out on top, but Jon Spaiht’s (The Darkest Hour, Prometheus, Doctor Strange) script is far more interested in warping the continuum into a linear, goes-down-well-with-popcorn narrative.

Now, I'm as happy as anybody to watch Pratt and Lawrence swanning around ludicrously pretty sets, going on space walks and going on dates to see Michael Sheen and his best smile, but, let’s be honest, both of them could have done this in their sleep: he’s very good at looking a bit smug and cuddly, she’s very good at crying in despair. By the film's very nature as multiplex fodder, there's no need for either to do much besides 'be themselves, but in space'.

And yet, I still feel a little let down by both, Pratt in particular. I’d really love to see what he could do with something outside his recently acquired comfort zone (heaven knows he's talented enough), but once again I’ve been left wanting. The first third of the movie is Jim by himself doing a fairly agreeable impression of Bruce Dern in Silent Running, and just when things are looking suitably grim, Passengers wimps out (much like the saccharine direction Trumbull’s film took, minus much of the grace), and Jim’s obsession with Aurora is played for an ‘aww’, not an ‘eww’. Just when you think a discussion on male entitlement or the definition of murder is rearing up, it cowers instead. I suppose the fact I’m even considering such topics with regard to ultimately fluffy popcorn fare shows there is more to it, but (as a friend I saw it with pointed out), that’s more to do with my own reading of the text than the film’s attempt to display those issues.


So, if it’s no good as a moral treatise, does it work as a cheerful holiday sci-fi? Well, the special effect set pieces are nicely exciting and the climax survives with minimal eye-rolling sentimentality, but a top-notch Thomas Newman score aside, there’s nothing that original going on, with many sequences feeling like half-hearted impressions of better movies. In a serious error of judgement, Tyldum attempts to evoke both Interstellar (time as the enemy, the psychological effects of being alone in space for years on end) and Danny Boyle’s Sunshine (the transit of a spaceship across the sun, only here it’s less reflective pause, more date night). It’s a collection of sci-fi bits n’ bobs slotted together into a uniformly attractive whole that trades darkness and debate for smiles and CGI.

Thursday, 19 November 2015

'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2' - Review

11/19/2015 10:26:00 pm
'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2' - Review


★ ★ ★ ★ 

This was always going to be the hard sell. The final book of The Hunger Games is widely regarded as the weakest of the trilogy, whilst Mockingjay Part 1 was critically judged (yours truly excluded) as the least successful of the films so far. Quite how Part 2 manages to conclude the series with such incendiary force (and next to no alteration of the source material) is a remarkable sight.

For the reputation of Mockingjay does not lie in excitable outbursts of sellable Hollywood action scenes, even if feats of derring-do are central to the story. We pick up the very moment we left Part 1 – Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) still hides in the bowels of District 13, having narrowly escaped death at the hands of tortured Peeta (Josh Hutcherson). The rebellion’s war on the Capitol is escalating, and Katniss is given little reprieve before snapping back into action in a final effort to bring down President Snow (Donald Sutherland), all she holds dear hanging in the balance.


Part 2 is as unapologetically bleak as the book, and is all the better for it: Lawrence is still captivating and rightly commands centre stage throughout, as Katniss yearns to end the suffering of Panem at ever-increasing personal risk. She clearly considers only one way her own story can end, so her reactions as those she loves are ripped from safety in her stead deliver scorching emotional resonance.

A darker narrative also allows for deeper exploration of the hopes, doubts and fears of our supporting players. Hutcherson has always been the least reliable of the cast members, but truly comes into his own here as Peeta’s loyalties are manipulated beyond his control, his warped vision of reality making the twists and turns of the plot more unpredictable than ever. Liam Hemsworth as Gale brings yet more complexity to the love triangle, and Donald Sutherland is clearly relishing his final moments as Snow. Even the gaggle of followers established in Part 1 – little more than uniform bystanders to Katniss’ experiences – are fleshed out over the course of the film, giving you more than reason to remember their names as well as their faces.

The adult themes (terrorism, the cost of war and morality of democracy) remain as consistent as the previous instalments, and come into heavier prominence as we edge closer to the heart of the Capitol. Whether engaging in street-bound firefights, evading deadly traps or – in one exquisitely heart-in-the-mouth sequence – wading through a hellish sewer, Katniss and company are doing more than simply play out the spectacle. A once plucky teenage revolution, replete with an accompanying album of pop songs (abandoned here purely in favour of James Newton-Howard’s gorgeous score), has morphed ferociously into a grown-up war story. It will do all it can to thrill, batter and break you.

Yes, the ending could lose the extra five minutes it uses re-establishing old motifs, and yes some talent is underutilised (Gwendoline Christie appears for all of one disposable scene), but Mockingjay Part 2 has more than earned the right to extravagance: by staying true to the source material, to its themes, and to its characters. This is how a legend ends: with a bang and a whimper.

Thursday, 20 November 2014

'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' - Review

11/20/2014 04:52:00 pm 0
'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' - Review
Having failed to keep her head down and having escaped the second round of the Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) and her allies hunker down in the bowels of District 13, planning their revolution to topple the capitol, under the leadership of President Coin (Julianne Moore). With her home destroyed and fellow games-survivor Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) behind enemy lines, Katniss must decide whether or not to stand as the symbol of the revolution.

What gives Mockingjay Part 1 a slight edge over its predecessor is that the repetitive element of going back into the games is dropped and the story is able to move into a new direction, and it’s very impressive how the defiant spirit is alive and tangible now the oppressive aura of the games has lifted. With the exception of Philip Seymour Hoffman as Heavensbee (who spends the film slyly grinning from the side-lines as everything falls into place), everyone appears to be building towards something, ready to drop everything and give their life for the cause.


Jennifer Lawrence is spectacular, managing to still find new things to do with her role and proving to everyone why she remains the lauded face of the modern film star. The array of supporting cast all shine, notably Elizabeth Banks as Effie – who arguably is given greater room to develop than anyone else – and Sam Claflin as pretty-boy turned heartbroken rebel Finnick. Even the Josh Hutcherson problem of the previous films (that problem being that he couldn’t act his way out of a paper bag) is solved by the story itself not needing him very much.

Something I find admirable about this film in comparison to the previous movies is that – for what is essentially a teen action movie – it spends a majority of its time building characters, investing time in the unravelling of the plot and keeping the audience engrossed in the story, and even when the action sequences rear their head the CG and explosions are handled just as carefully and just as involving as the rest, even if the final set-piece is all over the shop.

Mockingjay is also a very important note in the Hunger Games series musically: James Newton Howard is finally given room to breathe outside the games arena, providing a powerful soundtrack that really deserves more attention than the ‘soundtrack’ currently topping the charts (basically a bunch of songs with the poster plastered over the album cover). There is also a central set piece involving a love song which really harkens back (albeit in a more populist form) to the punk-rock idea of music as a weapon of the revolution, to not only speak out against the oppressors but to belt out your dissatisfaction from the rooftops.


Willing to go to dark places, unafraid of injecting a little humour and unashamed when it comes to favouring emotions over effects, Mockingjay Part 1 may be laden with a few too many rousing speeches and a stumbling final act but it reaches furiously for the heights of its predecessor and falls but a degree short. If this is the opening salvo, fans and audiences alike have much to look forward to in the final chapter.

★★★★

Sunday, 26 October 2014

'Serena' - Review

10/26/2014 12:11:00 pm 0
'Serena' - Review
Adapted from Ron Rash’s novel, Serena is the latest film to feature Jennifer Lawrence and Bradley Cooper as the leading couple. Set against the backdrop of the Smoky Mountains of Carolina in 1929, the film follows the trials and tribulations of businessman George (Cooper) and Serena Pemberton (Lawrence) as they come up against early environmentalists, business competitors and the law.

Shot way back in 2012 and after nearly eighteen months in the editing room, you’d be forgiven for assuming that the result would be a neatly trimmed, finely tuned labour of love, but in fact what you are left with just reeks of anti-climax. For all its pretentions to be about the titular character, her struggles, her personality and her fall from grace, the film is absolutely in love with Bradley Cooper, regardless of how much we like or dislike his character. The frame is constantly full of his perfectly groomed face, asking us to sympathise with his plight, wanting us to love him and his magic hands which he uses to pleasure his wife in some of the most boring sex scenes I have ever seen.


Cooper himself puts in a mediocre performance with an accent that wanders from incomprehensible to lazy, but Lawrence – as usual – is the greater of the leads, despite the rather ripe dialogue she’s given to work with. When she’s actually allowed in the frame, she works her usual magic of immersing herself within a role, but even her talent is eclipsed by Toby Jones as the town sheriff, who acts circles around everyone else. Rhys Ifans shows up from time to time as the shadowy Galloway and projects a gritty and more realistic southern façade than almost anyone else.

In plot terms, it’s centrally a very simple story but feels horribly episodic: plot strands are forgotten for twenty minutes at a time then picked up again in a hurry, and the film as a whole seems to drag. Considering the extensive editing process, perhaps I should be grateful that the already stretched 109 minutes wasn’t much longer, but the final twenty minutes feel so languorous that it’s difficult to forgive.

The cinematography is mostly bland but interspersed with single static shots of the incredible landscape, the score is decent when it can be heard above the film screaming for awards, and I spent a greater time of the filler scenes wondering: why should I be concerned about these people who live in ludicrous wealth? How does Bradley Cooper emerge bone-dry from a thunderstorm? Why am I supposed to dislike the sheriff character that is by far the most moral of the bunch? In the end, I realised that I just didn’t care.

With solid performances, brief moments of visual splendour, and a central female character who is the equal or greater of the men surrounding her, there should be much to celebrate about Serena. But the flat dialogue, narrow focus and unhealthy obsession with one lead over the other results in little more than an unmemorable, drawn-out melodrama.


2 stars

Saturday, 24 May 2014

'X-Men: Days of Future Past' - Review

5/24/2014 08:29:00 pm
'X-Men: Days of Future Past' - Review


Director Bryan Singer picks up the reins of the X-Men franchise for Days of Future Past, a story that brings together the disparate elements of the franchise into a single narrative. With mankind and mutant-kind on the edge of extinction by an army of machines known as the Sentinels, Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and Magneto (Ian McKellen) join forces in an effort to undo the past and safe the future by sending Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) back into the past to convince the young Xavier (James McAvoy) to help him stop the murder that causes the creation of the Sentinels.

It is remarkable just how much the film benefits from Singer and writer Simon Kinberg’s return. Having been joined at the hip for the first two instalments (arguably the strongest of the franchise), they return to bring the collective elements of all the films back together, simultaneously redeeming some of the flimsier elements, tying up loose ends and paying homage to each and every previous film. Another welcome return to the film is John Ottman as composer: the reprisal of the X-Men 2 theme as the opening credits rolled was all I needed to re-assure me that I was in for a treat. 




Where characters are concerned, we have a whole rogues’ gallery of past and present faces to enjoy. Stewart and McKellen reprise their roles with ease, Jackman is still the definitive Wolverine and James McAvoy was born to play the young Xavier. Whilst some of the newer characters don’t have much in the way of development, their unique abilities make them interesting to watch, especially Quicksilver, who delivers the majority of laughs in the movie. Peter Dinklage, still riding high on his success in Game of Thrones also puts in a fine performance as the suave but suspicious Bolivar Trask. Everyone involved appears to be having the time of their lives, and all give it their best acting chops despite increasingly ridiculous circumstances.

The blend of the past and future storylines is a seamless integration of the best parts of the X-Men story, the 1970’s sections keeping a high level of period detail and the future setting basking in a darkly apocalyptic style. But perhaps the strongest of many brilliant elements of the film is that while it does have its share of loud, effects heavy moments, the climax ditches the bombastic headache that most blockbusters would opt for and instead provides a quieter, more thoughtful finale that manages real moments of genuine emotion and darkness while giving cause for a smile here and there.

X-Men: Days of Future Past is a remarkable achievement in superhero movies, providing terrific entertainment, genuine emotional weight and managing to balance a wide spectrum of characters without sagging under the weight. It gives an entire franchise a clean slate, looks back lovingly at the past whilst opening up a whole host of opportunities for its future.

5 stars