Chris At The Pictures: matthew libatique
Showing posts with label matthew libatique. Show all posts
Showing posts with label matthew libatique. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

'mother!' - Review

9/19/2017 10:29:00 pm 0
'mother!' - Review

★ ½ ☆ ☆ ☆

After the big budget blowout of Noah, Darren Aronofsky returns to simpler times with this deliberately provocative tale of a man and woman (Javier Bardem and Jennifer Lawrence, whose characters remain unnamed) living peaceful, but soon-to-be interrupted lives. Basking in their Eden-like seclusion, Lawrence’s eponymous matriarch sets about restoring the house (with which she shares a mysterious, organic connection), while Bardem plays a troubled poet looking to write his masterwork. Just as inspiration appears to strike, an unknown couple (Ed Harris and Michelle Pfeiffer) stumble upon the pair, bringing with them the unspoken threat of upset and destruction.

For all it’s unclear narrative strokes and ambiguous dialogue, mother! is not a subtle film. The instant it’s central metaphor takes root, it's nigh-on impossible to focus on anything else. The intended discomfort and tension as Harris and Pfeiffer encroach upon the couple’s handiwork is totally undermined by an allegory so ham-fisted you could slice it up and serve it in sandwiches.

That a film so steeped in parable and analogy is playing in multiplexes should be something to celebrate, making Aranofsky’s failure to combine symbolism with a compelling story that much more infuriating. The overriding thesis of the film – at least, as it was apparent to me – is one I sympathise with, but I can’t see it winning over the average movie-goer. As evidenced by the movie’s plummeting CinemaScore across the pond, they’re likely to remain resolutely alienated by a mood piece comprised mostly of Jennifer Lawrence gasping and shrieking at the camera.

To see Lawrence return to comparatively ‘out there’ cinema after her string of mainstream roles is an exciting prospect, and sadly remains just that: something still to come. Her role here (to use the word ‘character’ seems generous considering her deployment as reflection or caricature) gives us nothing but fear and loathing, of which she gave ample demonstration across all four instalments of the Hunger Games series.

Pfieffer tries to save what she can (largely through a particularly delicate method of sipping lemonade), but it’s a hopeless effort. She – along with Harris and brief spells from Dohmnall Gleeson and Kristen Wiig – becomes just another face in the crown of walking, talking emblems that slowly but surely begin to overwhelm the isolated abode.

This increasingly fraught and claustrophobic home-invasion section of the film is where things truly go to pot. In terms of pure technical construction, there should be much to admire as time, space and bodies fast-forward, tighten and twist in a finale clearly designed to shock and awe. The established composition of mother! (a repetitive, clumsy and dull array of close-ups and over-the-shoulder shots) instead consigns us to crock and bore.

Saturday, 5 April 2014

'Noah' - Review

4/05/2014 09:55:00 am
'Noah' - Review


It says a lot about the power of a film when it can make you forget your own scepticism. As someone who has a great deal of problems with the story of Noah and the Ark (the fact that it is essentially a story about mass extermination with underlying tones of eugenics and resulting incest), I went into Noah - Darren Aronofsky’s take on the Biblical epic starring Russell Crowe in the titular role - not sure whether I could find a way in to the story without just feeling frustrated.




The most interesting thing about the film is that it appears to have been made by someone who understands the story for what it is – a myth – and have a great deal of fun with it creatively. Unlike a Biblical adaptation such as The Passion of the Christ, which took a horrific story and turned it essentially into torture porn, there is a noticeable effort to create something much more mythical and operatic in scale. The film is visually breath-taking, set entirely in an expansive world, full of great sweeping landscapes that feel almost science fiction, the stars still shining across the sky during the day, all captured beautifully by Matthew Libatique’s extraordinary digital cinematography. 

As far as performances go, the film is a powerhouse: whilst Russell Crowe (who only seems to be improving with age) provides a coarse and determined façade as Noah, with the self-righteous fury of a religious zealot burning beneath, he is not the film’s guiding light. Where on Earth has Jennifer Connelly (who I’ve always found to have a rather stale screen presence) been hiding this performance all her life? Absolutely entrancing as Noah’s wife Naameh, she offers some semblance of kindness and sanity in the midst of the harsh and brutal world of the film. Emma Watson has come a very long way since the Harry Potter series and continues to mature and develop into a fine actress, giving a wonderful performance as Noah’s adopted daughter, Ila, who is forced during the course of the story to carry a burden almost greater symbolically than Noah himself.

In terms of visual and special effects, the ark is a seamlessly melded blend of enormous sets and well-designed CGI, and the great montage sequences detailing the passing of years or the creation of the Earth are extraordinary. The CGI effects of the Watchers (fallen angels bound in rock, instructed to help construct the ark) seem to have been designed with great care, their clumsy and difficult movement more reminiscent of a stop-motion creation than the walking monoliths from something like Wrath of the Titans or The Hobbit. It is only the effects used to create the vast numbers of animals that feel a little tacky, the snakes and birds in particular feeling a little Disney-fied at times. 

The flood scene itself is incredibly intense, the great torrents shooting up from beneath the Earth and huge swathes of water crashing over the ark (and the actors) feeling very real despite the heavy use of CGI, Clint Mansell’s booming score giving it even more heft, really accentuating the feel of a classic Biblical epic. It is interesting to note that the film is given a 12a rating by the BBFC for ‘moderate violence and threat’, although I’d argue that a 15 would be more practical. I understand that this story is supposed to be for all ages, but some of the imagery and use of sound in the initial aftermath of the flood is stretching the mark for a 12a by a considerable margin.

Noah is a triumphant return of the Biblical epic to the big screen, boasting sumptuous visuals, incredible performances and a mythical sensibility that makes the story accessible to a vast audience and faces the moral and religious problems of the story in a way that is intriguing and uncompromising.

4.5 Stars