Chris At The Pictures: franchise
Showing posts with label franchise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label franchise. Show all posts

Sunday, 16 December 2018

BUMBLEBEE - Review

12/16/2018 09:17:00 pm 1
BUMBLEBEE - Review
Hailee Steinfeld in BUMBLEBEE (Paramount Pictures (c), photo by Enrique Chediak)
★ ★ ★ ½ ☆

Well, here’s a Christmas miracle: after a decade of increasingly puerile cruelty, the Bay/Spielberg Transformers franchise finds a heart. Hailee Steinfeld leads this 80s-set prequel as Charlie, a budding mechanic who discovers the titular robot in a junkyard. Disguised as a rusty Volkswagen Beetle, ‘Bee’ is on the run from a war on his home planet, Cyberton, and tasked by resistance leader, Optimus Prime, with finding the freedom-fighting Autobots a new home. 

Though placed chronologically before Michael Bay’s own efforts, this serves as a soft reboot/retelling of the 2007 original, with Steinfeld taking up the Shia LaBoeuf role (albeit with a total absence of masturbation jokes). Charlie is a far more sympathetic character, however, and allowed more motivation than Sam Witwicky’s simple quest to get laid. A once promising diver, she’s retired to the garage, obsessed with a broken corvette that she and her recently-deceased father used to cherish. 

Steinfeld brings lovable wide-eyed wonder to Charlie, providing not only this franchise’s first fully-rounded character, but one which young audiences can admire and sympathise with (her mother fusses needlessly, her stepfather is embarrassing, her brother steals their affections, and so on). When she sees Bee metamorphose from motor to mech for the first time, her closely-guarded sadness begins to transform (sorry) into something much closer to hope. One immediately feels echoes of E.T. and The Iron Giant which continue to emerge as the two form a delightful double act.

Christina Hodson sneaks more than one fish-out-of-water cliché into the screenplay, but that crucial presence of genuine pathos sets this prequel light years beyond what we’ve come to expect. The scenes of Bee attempting to navigate the family living room or learning to hide in plain sight are gems of physical comedy, and all based in the burgeoning emotional bond between teen and titan. Even John Cena (carving a great slice of ham in the undemanding role of ‘generic special forces man’) is gifted a neat moment of empathy. 

Perhaps more surprising still are the scenes of robo-rough-and-tumble. Director Travis Knight - whose last film was the wonderful animation Kubo and the Two Strings - knows how to make proper use of space in an action sequence, electing to pull the camera back and slow down the editing pace. A hectic opening skirmish on the robot homeworld - a landscape not short on spikes, girders, and other untidy metalwork - is still more tangible than anything glimpsed in the series thus far (a relief to those fearing the scrap metal orgies of episodes past). Our combatants have also been reduced in number by a factor of ten, and redesigned to more closely resemble the iconic action figures.

Painted in bright, primary colours, their retreat to the crash-bang-wallop of child’s play is symbolic of what this franchise should have been from the start. The heroes are heroic, the villains are villainous, the music is a joyful 80s mixtape, and at no point does Optimus Prime turn into a murderous zealot. Rejoice!

Thursday, 13 December 2018

AQUAMAN - Review

12/13/2018 04:35:00 pm 1
AQUAMAN - Review
Jason Momoa as Arthur Curry in AQUAMAN (Warner Bros. (c), still photo by Mark Rogers)

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Jason Momoa’s effortless charisma and a rich score from Rupert Gregson-Williams are all that prevent the DC universe’s latest voyage from totally capsizing. In all fairness, neither Aquaman or its leading man can be blamed for the reverse-engineered structure of Warner’s answer to the MCU - our protagonist has already appeared in two previous instalments before this; his actual origins story. Nor can they be blamed for the simple fact that digital technology - as powerful as it is - simply isn’t able to convincingly deliver the vast underwater world demanded by the premise. In a comic book? Yup. In animated form? Fine. In a 143-minute ‘live action’ film? Give it five years and a breakthrough in swimming simulations, then we’ll talk.

In the meantime, however, this overstuffed adventure will have to tide fans over. Despite saving the surface world in Justice League, Arthur Curry (Momoa) refuses to accept his Atlantean heritage. His mother, Atlanna (a quite literally washed-up Nicole Kidman), fell for human lighthouse keeper, Tom (Temuera Morrison, rather shoddily de-aged). But beneath the ocean waves, Arthur’s half brother, Orm (Patrick Wilson), rules with an iron fist, planning to wreak havoc on the human world for their crimes against the environment. With the help of sea sorceress, Mera (Amber Heard, in a wig that the cast of RuPaul’s Drag Race might generously deem “a bit much”), Arthur sets out to reclaim the all-powerful trident of Atlan and reclaim his soggy throne.

Director James Wan upturns the tech toybox to play out his kid-in-the-bathtub fantasy, but an enormous visual effects budget is all for naught when spread so unevenly. Giant seahorses, crab monsters and sharks with “frickin’ laser beams attached to their heads” are impressively rendered, but the compositing of human characters leaves much to be desired. There’s a difference between pushing the boundaries and simply pretending they don’t exist: watching the climactic showdown (two armies of pixelated humans astride copy-pasted monsters smashing into one another), I finally understood how audiences of 2002 felt, experiencing George Lucas’ unchecked digital ambition unfold. With the exception of one impressively physical fistfight in the bowels of a submarine, derring-do here is an entirely weightless, witless affair.

But that’s where similarities to the Star Wars prequels end. In 2018, such displays of extravagance are the norm, no longer the stuff of a single visionary auteur fusing Greek tragedy with the cutting edge of filmmaking. Plus, while clunky expositional dialogue wasn’t exactly thin-on-the-ground in Lucas’ trilogy, Aquaman positively drowns in its own storytelling. Besides Arthur’s main quest for the trident, we also have Orm’s uprising, numerous flashbacks to our muscleman’s childhood, and a second, altogether more entertaining villain in the shape of Black Manta (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II), a pirate with a score to settle (and the laser-spitting helmet to prove it).
So, let’s take stock: a hairy hero’s quest to show his worth by reclaiming an ancient weapon, a lush fantastical world, a super-powered royal family, a sibling rivalry that threatens to lay waste to the outside world, and a secondary antagonist with a penchant for face-based plasma: yep, it’s Kenneth Branagh’s Thor...with drumming octopuses!

Wednesday, 6 June 2018

'Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom' - Review

6/06/2018 10:42:00 pm 0
'Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom' - Review

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

The park has gone and so has all direction and imagination in this interminable continuation of the Jurassic Park franchise. With neither the depth of Spielberg’s first adventure, the scare factor of his under-appreciated sequel, nor the nostalgic charm of 2015’s Jurassic World (the less said of Jurassic Park III, the better), this entry settles for retreading old ground. With the facility at Isla Nublar in ruins (again), a shady businessman plans to airlift the dinosaurs back to the mainland (again) in order that they may be exploited for military purposes (again), and also to spite his more aged and more peace-loving mentor (again).

As for our heroes, Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard) is now a stringent dinosaur-rights activist, and she begrudgingly recruits Owen (Chris Pratt) to assist in saving the remaining dinosaurs from Isla Nublar’s suddenly active volcano. That is, before the doomed creatures are plucked from deliverance by Rafe Spall as the aforementioned suit, armed with a smile as untrustworthy as your average social media privacy policy.

Director J.A. Byona and cinematographer Óscar Faura do their best to bring some semblance of awe to proceedings, but returning screenwriters Colin Trevorrow and Derek Connolly’s script suffocates the Spanish duo’s usual flair for likeable characters and haunting imagery. There are some glimpses of the young Richard Dreyfuss in Pratt’s portrayal of Owen, but not enough to prevent him slipping into Star Lord-lite. Howard goes all in on the running (appropriately booted this time around) and screaming, and is easily the most watchable human presence. A new sidekick played by Justice Smith is immediately annoying, and his disappearance from the middle act would be a relief, were it not another indicator of the feckless screenplay losing track of who’s where and why.

“Why?” is a question I found myself asking a lot during this film. Mostly “Why aren’t I just at home watching Jurassic Park?”. The re-heated narrative structure, knock-off set pieces (we’re treated to re-runs of the museum showdown and The Lost World’s downtown dinos), plus a perfunctory appearance from Jeff Goldblum continuously serve to remind us of movies we’d rather be watching. And it’s never scary. Not once. My entire generation can attest to the nightmares of poor Eddie being bisected by the T-Rex pair in The Lost World, and the most this softened rehash can muster is ‘occasional bloody moments’. A largely dialogue-free prologue featuring some truly stunning imagery of monsters in the moonlight is the closest we come to genuine thrills, which is more than can be said for the genetically-enhanced ‘Indoraptor’, introduced by Toby Jones doing his best Donald Trump impression.

This creature is another of the screenplay’s walking clunkers: it’s sold to us as the fusion between Jurassic World’s Indominus Rex and a Velociraptor. A key plot point of the previous film was that the multi-breed Indominus was part-Raptor, and could therefore weaponise Owen’s pack against him. Did they just add more? Extra raptor with your half-raptor, sir? The Indominus - while not particularly chilling - served as a neat analogy for Hollywood’s misunderstanding that bigger equals better. The Indoraptor’s purpose seems to be to remind us that...er...rich people can be greedy and stupid? I don’t need the film to tell me that: that it exists at all is proof enough.

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

'King Arthur: Legend of the Sword' - Review

5/23/2017 12:00:00 pm
'King Arthur: Legend of the Sword' - Review

★ ★ ½ ☆ 

Chock full of smirk-inducing dialogue and many a fire-wielding enchanter, Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur: Legend of the Sword finds it very difficult to avoid the obvious Monty Python jokes. As the opening expository scroll faded, to be replaced by the location marker ‘Camelot’, all I wanted to do was lean across to my neighbour and whisper “It’s only a model!” Far from the usual social anxiety, my reason for resisting was that I had no-one to talk to: in solidarity with the film’s lacklustre US box office performance, the cinema was nearly empty.

Emptiness is a key problem on-screen, too. For all the fusing of Ritchie’s guns ‘n’ geezers formula with indestructible myths, there’s nothing but sparse and superficial thrills to be gained. With so much of our pop culture landscape defined by retellings of Arthurian legend, this return to the original tale feels oddly derivative. Narratively, it’s more akin to Star Wars than any fantasy yarn of old: the wizards have all but died out, and a young man must summon the courage to wield his father’s blue-glowing weapon and face a series of trials and visions before confronting a black-clad enemy who’s bound to him by blood.

Charlie Hunnam portrays an Arthur raised in a brothel on the streets of Londinium, who swans about with his motley crew of characters who owe more to EastEnders’ Queen Vic than Antoine Fuqua’s King Arthur. Their exaggerated accents are jarring, but at least they’re committed to the ‘Danny Dyer goes LARPing’ aesthetic. Our lead remains resolutely on-brand, emoting purely through shoulder-squaring and the odd grimace.

While Hunnam is humdrum, Jude Law is far from a bore. Embracing the role of Arthur’s evil uncle, Vortigern, and all the leathery bellowing that comes with it, he may not be the most sympathetic presence, but is easily most fun to be around. One scene sees him deliver a threat to one of Arthur’s chums, cutting off their ear when they refuse to comply. Law repeats his deadly promise into the severed ear in a way that should instil stunned fear, but instead caused yours truly to stifle a giggle. Another such joy occurs later when a topless, gimp-masked Vortigern dares Arthur to “Come and touch me”.

The most sympathetic role by far is Ritchie's own blink-and-you’ll-miss-it appearance as a shady dealer who takes one look at the assembled cockney crusaders and delivers the gestural equivalent of “Nah, y’alright, mate”. By this point in the film, we’ve all made a similar assessment. The occasional, unintentional chuckle and a bravura opening sequence (which offers more to fans of the Halo: ODST video game than anyone else) are poor reward for the total lack of self-awareness on display, best demonstrated by the female characters. Arthur’s unnamed mage accomplice (played with eye-popping gusto by Astrid Bergès-Frisbey) is only brought up when the plot demands her mystical abilities but is otherwise forgotten because learning to write women isn’t something Ritchie and his cowriters (Joby Harold and Lionel Wigram) have bothered with yet. Similarly wasted is Katie McGrath, who British viewers will recognise from her role as Morgana in the TV series Merlin, killed off before five minutes have passed.

Despite the furious pacing, snap-zoom camerawork and Daniel Pemberton's glorious romp of a score, there’s no urgency to any of it. The constant use of slow-mo and a colour palette that forgets to include anything but orange and grey drains what energy there is until a cameo from David Beckham fails to elicit even the most exasperated smirk. Legend of the Sword’s slim but laudable potential slowly gives way to a drab exercise in indulgence and buffoonery, its foul mouth betraying an empty head.

Monday, 15 May 2017

'Alien: Covenant' - Review

5/15/2017 01:08:00 pm
'Alien: Covenant' - Review

★ ★ ★  

Ridley Scott loses the plot somewhat in this bold and barmy return to the Alien franchise. Ten years on from the disappearance of the Prometheus, a colonization ship intercepts a transmission from the missing crew. Acting Captain Oram (Billy Crudup) makes a beeline for its point of origin, against the express wishes of terraforming commander Daniels (Katherine Waterston). Upon landing, the colonists encounter a long-derelict spacecraft, a deadly pathogen and a single living soul: the android, David (Michael Fassbender), last apparent survivor of the Prometheus mission.

A far cry from the doomed optimism of Prometheus, the tone here is one of heavy portent. The colours are a grey wash, smiles are rarely cracked, and the narrative plunges a downward spiral to oblivion. Covenant has the chutzpah to pick up from its 2012 predecessor in narrative form, but the inclusion of Alien in the title and marketing shackles it to the franchise, and not always for the best.

It’s a viscous, bulging sac of visionary ideas struggling to burst forth from a largely uninspired narrative. Stop me if you’ve heard this one: shipmates woken early, a distress signal found, one wrecked spaceship, several minutes of screaming  (and a partridge in a pear tree). After the lukewarm, and even hostile, response to Prometheus, it feels like Scott had to make certain concessions before Fox gave the reins back, hence why every horrific moment or action pulse-pounder feels like an ‘in your own words’ answer to an Alien trivia exam (Jerry Goldsmith’s original music cues are brandished too, with the slyest of grins).

However, Scott still gets his own way: the viscera is unabashed and grotesque (H.R. Giger would be proud), the special effects and visuals are slick, and there’s a generous helping of weirdness the likes of which we haven’t seen since Blade Runner. His opus is referred to throughout, in small dialogue notes (“That’s the spirit!”) and the many exchanges between David and the colonists’ own doppelganger robot, Walter. Doctor Tyrell’s “More human than human” echoed endlessly in my head as the two examined, probed and prodded each other. Fassbender proves his mastery once more by giving both roles distinct idiosyncrasies and literally creating sexual tension with himself.

Not all of it works. The literature-heavy screenplay and po-faced discussions about the nature of artificial intelligence grate just occasionally, with some audience members giggling outright. The same derision was also aimed at the human characters’ casual approach to alien eggs and dark rooms, a staple of the franchise now wearing thin. I didn’t care one jot about the colonists, either. I have a sneaking suspicion we’re not really supposed to, but if that’s the case, why are there so many of them? Waterston and Crudup proved more than capable exceptions to my apathy (the former especially), but they’re side-lined in favour of everything else rolling about in this great tumble-drier of a film.


It’s predictable and overstuffed; a rush to connect this set of prequels with the original films that simultaneously takes too long to get going and sprints to the finish line, stomping inconsistencies into the ground in its wake. And yet, I’d argue Covenant is worth the sore feet. Scott remains an interesting case of authorship in Hollywood, and his dedication to religious themes and future prediction is as unshaken as ever… if only he could only find a way to balance them better with the xenomorph zealotry we all know and love.

Wednesday, 3 May 2017

'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' - Review

5/03/2017 09:16:00 pm
'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' - Review

★ ★ ★  


“All you do is shout at each other!” – the frustrated words of cyborg assassin Nebula (Karen Gillan) ring loud and true regarding Marvel’s dizzying and thunderous return to the stars. Following an incursion with a giant tentacle monster and gold-faced aliens, the Guardians of the Galaxy find themselves split in two. Peter Quill (Chris Pratt), Gamora (Zoe Saldana) and Drax (Dave Bautista) head off into the unknown on the trail of the living planet, Ego (Kurt Russell), while Rocket (Bradley Cooper) and Groot (now Borrowers-scale and voiced by a squeaky Vin Diesel) are left to fend for themselves against hordes of space pirates.

To call anything that comes from the Disney-Marvel slate “risky” seems a bit much, but I at least confess my admiration for an audacious opening set piece, which places the action itself in the background and distracts us with a three-minute dance number as the titles play out. My enjoyment even stretched to the use of ‘Mr Blue Sky’, a song which I freely admit detesting, largely thanks to its association with many awful British summer time TV adverts.

Accidentally going along with things that shouldn’t work is an experience that defined my time spent in the company of James Gunn’s new film. Whether snorting at Drax’ cacophony of trouser humour or wryly noting the onslaught of 80’s pop culture references (is there really an audience crossover between Marvel and Cheers?), I had a great time with this movie, make no mistake…even if said movie itself is far, far from great. Despite its bum-numbing length, largely inconsequential roster of side characters and one moment where it turns into Man of Steel (and not in a good way), Guardians 2 is infectiously fun. The cast are engaging, the music – both the new Awesome Mix and Tyler Bates’ score – is glorious and hearty, and it leaves the audience awash with smiles.

Only occasionally does the smile falter. Constant bickering between the bunch gets a bit much, hence my sympathies with Nebula as the Guardians’ prisoner. Pratt’s delivery is the main offender, bouncing back between soft aural honey and wide-eyed barking, with Cooper’s shrieking raccoon a close second. Mercifully, they’re usually cut off mid-rant by Bautista’s pin-precise comedic timing or a relatable glower from Saldana. Even the extensively-marketed baby Groot gags take a good while to start wearing thin, stuffed to the brim as the film is.

Like a sports car stuck in traffic, the movie wants to whip-pan from scene to scene, but is reined in by sequences that take an age to pass. There’s so much going on visually and referentially (gags about Mary Poppins, Pac-Man and an allusion to Hitchcock’s North by Northwest, to name but a few), crammed into a narrative that hops from one side of the universe to the other like there’s a hedgehog in its seat.
Here, Guardians 2 goes for the whole Empire Strikes Back deal (the gang are separated after an early conflict and familial ties are revealed), but with a modicum of the depth and none of the darkness. But that’s fine: in a film with the aesthetic of a Haribo factory on fire, anything too challenging or tonally murky would set the atmosphere askance.

In terms of the wider cinematic universe this is little more than a jaunty side-step from endless avenging; the filmic equivalent of a village fireworks display. It goes on longer than anyone really needs it to, but you stay the course and suffer the repetitive whizz-bangs because there’s free candy floss, your best mates have turned up and you’re all howling with laughter because the vicar just took a Catherine wheel to the crotch.

Saturday, 4 February 2017

'The LEGO Batman Movie' - Review

2/04/2017 11:17:00 pm
'The LEGO Batman Movie' - Review

★ ★ ★ ★ 

Back in the early noughties, Warner Bros. took a mighty risk on an up-and-coming director, Christopher Nolan, gifting him the reins of their most lucrative property. Three films – bringing with them a decade of financial and critical success – defined a comic book legend for a whole new generation: tormented, elemental, and believable. Now another Chris (McKay, he of Robot Chicken fame) takes the directing seat and immediately shines a spotlight on the rubber nipples, pointing out the ridiculousness of trying to take a grown man and his cosplay obsession seriously.

In this spin-off of sorts to 2014’s anarchically enjoyable The LEGO Movie, the focus is purely on Will Arnett’s clueless crusader and his suits, villains, vehicles, puns, and – as noted by Ralph Fiennes’ Alfred - “even that weird stuff from 1966”. Barbara Gordon (Rosario Dawson) takes control of the Gotham Police force and suggests an allegiance with Batman, thereby threatening the winged wonder’s lifestyle of singlehandedly taking down criminals by day and guffawing at the dénouement of Jerry Maguire by night. Begrudgingly accepting help from newly-adopted Dick Grayson (an ingeniously cast Michael Cera), Batman sets out to prove his worth as a lone wolf with calamitous, hilarious results.

Moving at the same break-neck speed as its predecessor, LEGO Batman bobs and weaves through explosions of comedy. A burning heart of child-like joy, an outer debris field of pop culture content and smoky wisps of LEGO-obsessive in-jokes (the Gotham City cinema advertises 'Two Shades of Bley') ensure not a single funny bone is left un-tickled. It's not merely pointing and laughing at Batman; the screenwriters clearly love the character and his stories, and so the barely-contained affection they have for other fans shines just as brightly.

Arnett’s gravelly delivery never stops being hilarious and Cera is the finest he’s been since Scott Pilgrim, but our hearts belong entirely to Ralph Fiennes as Alfred and his very British expletives, always one step away from lumping "Master Bruce" with an ASBO. Meanwhile, Zach Galifianakis as the overly-attached Joker is a more interesting portrayal of the clown prince of crime than Jared Leto and his method-acting hokum will ever be. Plus he’s actually, y’know, funny!

The colourfully jovial attitude of the 60's TV show, a bombastic score worthy of the Nolan movies (Hans Zimmer’s frequent collaborator Lorne Balfe is an inspired choice of composer) and justice for some left behind by the Schumacher films seal the deal (Billy Dee Williams reprises his role as Harvey Two-Face after nearly thirty years). It's everything that 2016’s grossly misjudged adaptation of The Killing Joke wasn't: smart, beautifully animated and unquestionably cinematic, with a keenly unique eye for the Batman-Joker relationship. Additionally, it doesn't make Barbara Gordon surplus to seedy requirement, but instead an equal, nay, superior force to the mammalian mansplainer.

Drawbacks? Well, the central message intended to give the kids pause for thought is nothing particularly new. In fact, it borrows heavily from The LEGO Movie's "Everything is cool when you're part of a team" mantra...but frankly, when's that ever been a bad thing? It’s a family film in message and content, it’s ‘U’ certificate signified by my favourite of all BBFC guidance notes; “Contains rude humour”.

If there is any downside, it has to be that there aren’t any Batman jokes to make anymore. Seriously. YouTube’s How it Should Have Ended series may as well announce redundancy now that an entire avenue of superhero parody has now been swiftly neutralised with the stroke of a well-aimed Batarang. Trying to grab hold of every joke is like attempting to snatch bullets from the air, which seems entirely appropriate as a fault when that's a job more suited to Superman. When ‘too much comedy’ is the worst criticism I can level, there’s no choice but to concede defeat, don the plastic cowl, do a bit of Bat-beat-boxing and lay down the ‘THWACK!’ on some Daleks.


…oh, sorry, did I forget to mention there are Daleks in it?

Thursday, 17 December 2015

A few words on 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens'

12/17/2015 03:34:00 am
A few words on 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens'


For the longest time I debated whether to even try reviewing this film. When you’ve been anticipating something for over ten years, a certain level of personal bias is to be expected. For me (and obviously, many others around the world) this is not a film, it is an event.

Everyone who knows me knows how much I love Star Wars. It doesn’t matter if you’re a close friend, one of my Twitter followers or someone I once drunkenly encountered at a house party; it’s one of the first things anyone learns about me. Some might think that’s a bit sad, but it doesn’t bother me. Better notorious by my enthusiasm for one thing than hatred for another, right?

I’ve loved these movies for longer than I can remember, and have bored friends and family to death talking about them ever since. Heck, I even wrote my own version of Episode VII back in 2005 at age ten during my post Revenge of the Sith sugar low, convinced that no-one else ever would. This conviction remained for the next seven years through endless rumours, supposed treatment leaks, faked trailers, the works…right up until the 2012 announcement that Disney had taken control of Lucasfilm and that production on the seventh chapter was underway.

Of course, I’ve been embarrassingly excited. Of course, I’ve counted down the years, months, days, hours, even minutes until the film reached release…but not without a very specific reservation. Being a fan of all six films is not something the internet hive-mind approves of: if you see an article about The Force Awakens that doesn’t contain an opening line about how ‘let-down’ or ‘disappointed’ everyone was with the prequels, you treasure it.

Sadly, this assumed ‘truth’ that everyone dislikes a sizeable chunk of the established canon appeared to have leaked into the production: all the talk of returning to the spirit of the original trilogy, to an old-school way of film-making reeked of an attempt to appease forty year-old fanboys, and a denial of half the stories which I loved growing up. As selfish and hypocritical as it sounds, I was worried that this film was not made for me.

Even as I took a seat in the crowded IMAX screen, my best friend at my side and a palpable aura of excitement filling the room, I just couldn’t shake the feeling that something would go wrong: not in the modern multiplex sense of ‘What if the image is out of focus?’, but something closer to the fear of having your heart broken by someone you love.

To cut a long story short: I had a bad feeling about this.

To cut it shorter: I was wrong.

I’m not in the right frame of mind to write a more coherent review until a second viewing, because trying to piece together my thoughts right now is like trying to keep water from slipping through my fingers.

"Everything's changed and nothing's changed...that's the way you want it to be, really..." - Mark Hamill

Thursday, 19 November 2015

'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2' - Review

11/19/2015 10:26:00 pm
'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2' - Review


★ ★ ★ ★ 

This was always going to be the hard sell. The final book of The Hunger Games is widely regarded as the weakest of the trilogy, whilst Mockingjay Part 1 was critically judged (yours truly excluded) as the least successful of the films so far. Quite how Part 2 manages to conclude the series with such incendiary force (and next to no alteration of the source material) is a remarkable sight.

For the reputation of Mockingjay does not lie in excitable outbursts of sellable Hollywood action scenes, even if feats of derring-do are central to the story. We pick up the very moment we left Part 1 – Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) still hides in the bowels of District 13, having narrowly escaped death at the hands of tortured Peeta (Josh Hutcherson). The rebellion’s war on the Capitol is escalating, and Katniss is given little reprieve before snapping back into action in a final effort to bring down President Snow (Donald Sutherland), all she holds dear hanging in the balance.


Part 2 is as unapologetically bleak as the book, and is all the better for it: Lawrence is still captivating and rightly commands centre stage throughout, as Katniss yearns to end the suffering of Panem at ever-increasing personal risk. She clearly considers only one way her own story can end, so her reactions as those she loves are ripped from safety in her stead deliver scorching emotional resonance.

A darker narrative also allows for deeper exploration of the hopes, doubts and fears of our supporting players. Hutcherson has always been the least reliable of the cast members, but truly comes into his own here as Peeta’s loyalties are manipulated beyond his control, his warped vision of reality making the twists and turns of the plot more unpredictable than ever. Liam Hemsworth as Gale brings yet more complexity to the love triangle, and Donald Sutherland is clearly relishing his final moments as Snow. Even the gaggle of followers established in Part 1 – little more than uniform bystanders to Katniss’ experiences – are fleshed out over the course of the film, giving you more than reason to remember their names as well as their faces.

The adult themes (terrorism, the cost of war and morality of democracy) remain as consistent as the previous instalments, and come into heavier prominence as we edge closer to the heart of the Capitol. Whether engaging in street-bound firefights, evading deadly traps or – in one exquisitely heart-in-the-mouth sequence – wading through a hellish sewer, Katniss and company are doing more than simply play out the spectacle. A once plucky teenage revolution, replete with an accompanying album of pop songs (abandoned here purely in favour of James Newton-Howard’s gorgeous score), has morphed ferociously into a grown-up war story. It will do all it can to thrill, batter and break you.

Yes, the ending could lose the extra five minutes it uses re-establishing old motifs, and yes some talent is underutilised (Gwendoline Christie appears for all of one disposable scene), but Mockingjay Part 2 has more than earned the right to extravagance: by staying true to the source material, to its themes, and to its characters. This is how a legend ends: with a bang and a whimper.