Chris At The Pictures: spy
Showing posts with label spy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spy. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 September 2017

'Kingsman: The Golden Circle' - Review

9/21/2017 03:13:00 pm 0
'Kingsman: The Golden Circle' - Review

★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Matthew Vaughn’s spy series makes a haphazard pivot from ‘parody of bad Bond films’ to ‘bad parody of itself’ in this simultaneously listless yet overblown sequel. Taron Egerton returns as Eggsy, now left with only Mark Strong’s agent Merlin for company when the Kingsman organisation is all-but obliterated around them. Their enemy: Julianne Moore’s drug overlord, Poppy, a sugary-voiced villainess with a penchant for human meat burgers, robots, and Elton John.

The first Kingsman was very much a Marmite film: you were either won over by its homegrown Bond/Bourne/Bauer pastiche or disgusted by its button-pushing. Being an awkward sort, I fell somewhere in the middle, appreciating the unabashed comic violence and Alex Rider overtones but blanching somewhat at its seedier elements, particularly that final bum note (pun fully intended).

Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman have clearly taken the controversy over Hanna Alström’s backside deeply to heart…and doubled-down. Partway through The Golden Circle (which sees Eggsy and Merlin join forces with their American counterparts, the Statesman), Egerton’s character is tasked with tagging the girlfriend of an enemy agent with a tracking device. With no explanation besides a sly wink from Pedro Pascal’s Agent Whiskey and a shrugged “It’s not going up her nose!”, our hero is to secrete the tracker within the genitalia of the oblivious Clara (Poppy Delevigne). After calling his girlfriend to ask her permission (which she does not give), Eggsy commits. As composers Henry Jackman and Matthew Margeson deliver a heroic fanfare, Matthew “bloody feminists” Vaughn treats us to a close-up the likes of which a certain orange-faced misogynist would call “Tremendous”.

Looking for any excuse for this abhorrence, some fans might reach for The Golden Circle’s plethora of great female roles. They’d come up short. Halström is a plot motivation, Eggsy’s classmate Roxy is blown to smithereens in the opening salvo, and Halle Berry (playing Merlin’s equivalent in the Statesman organization) is exposition in a wig.

Moore’s villain finds me yet again confused as to why I’m supposed to dislike the Kingsman antagonists (decapitation bombs and cannibal fast food hobbies aside). Hot on the heels of Samuel L. Jackson’s eco-warrior from the first film, Poppy’s demand to the government is the legalization and supervised access to recreational drugs, an aim that makes her more sympathetic than the brutish Anglo-American spies bulldozing their way across the globe to find her (at least, until her relationship with the US president is revealed, to more sinister ends).

Her beaming smile as she feeds Keith Allen into a mincer provides some glee, as do the rough-and-tumble brawls towards the film’s conclusion. A robot arm-wielding henchman allows for some inventive choreography, and in the long-take ballets of umbrellas and uppercuts, it’s easy to see where the budget’s been spent. It certainly didn’t go towards the CGI, which is replete with green-screen outlines and aliasing as digital models of buildings, landscapes and cages meld into one-another.

You may have noticed I haven’t got around to mentioning the other big names from the poster campaign: Channing Tatum, Jeff Bridges, and the inexplicable return of Colin Firth as Harry Hart. I only thought it fair to give them their representation as reflected by the film. Tatum is little more than a cameo appearance, Bridges is…well, Bridges, and I’m still not entirely convinced that Firth ever showed up. There’s a catchphrase-spouting waxwork doing an impression of him, though, the artifice of which is further exacerbated by Egerton’s uncrackable charisma.

As for Moore, her total screen-time is eclipsed by that of her popstar prisoner. John’s gormlessly smug guest spot culminates in his offering free tickets to his next gig, should the Kingsman help him escape. If his eye-scraping appearance here is any indication of his current talents, he can keep them.

Friday, 2 December 2016

'Allied' - Review

12/02/2016 11:22:00 pm
'Allied' - Review

★ ★ ☆  ☆

In complete antithesis to the opening of Forrest Gump –a single feather tumbling lightly through the air, enhanced by the subtlest of cutting-edge effects – the first shot of Robert Zemeckis’ new film, Allied, indicates a venture doomed from the start. Canadian intelligence officer Max Vatan (Brad Pitt) is airdropped into the Moroccan desert; CG sand billows and warps, the parachute ripples with artifice, and you can almost see the transition between computer-built puppet and physical actor.

Such obvious and cheap-looking visual additions hamper much of this tepid World War 2 thriller, which sees Pitt and Marion Cotillard (playing fictional French resistance badass Marianne Beausejour) working undercover as an affluent husband and wife, before genuinely falling in love. Loyalties are later tested when commanding officer Heslop (a bristling, brusque Jared Harris) reveals that Vatan’s wife and mother of his child may, in fact, have ulterior motives.

We begin in Casablanca (never a good location to reference in post-war cinema, for obvious reasons), where – despite the odd clumsy line – the setup is all rather enticing, and an early sequence of two-versus-twenty machine gun action is fantastically punchy. The period detail is, of course, perfect, because this is Robert Zemeckis, and nothing escapes his eye. Well, besides the fact his leads have precisely zero chemistry. God bless Marion Cotillard for staying the distance, because she is utterly captivating; believable, yet with those classical Hollywood idiosyncrasies that make a tiny voice in your head remind you that it’s all for show. Plus, let’s be honest; no-one else could saunter about in a selection of 1940s silk nightgowns with quite as much panache.

One might be persuaded that this is what happens when two of the world’s most glamorous stars are made to play characters already play-acting themselves: the detachment from reality is increased two-fold, and investment is rendered near-impossible. I hope to dissuade you of this notion, because any lack of connection is entirely the fault of our leading man. Brad Pitt (the Brad Pitt!) is astonishingly, demand-a-refund, write-home-to-your-mother poor. He spends the first hour with a look that says “I need to bring up phlegm but people keep talking to me”. Then, in the second, his stricken face betrays not “What if my wife’s a Nazi?”, nor “Will I lose my child?”, but “If I farted, would anyone notice?”

Digital airbrushing and having to perform alongside a completely magnetic Cotillard at all times is a cruel combination, but that’s really no excuse for such a brick wall of charisma. Sex scenes between the two may confuse viewers, who’ll find themselves concerned over Marianne’s fruitless attempts to untangle herself from a particularly unresponsive deck chair…and why it’s got a side parting. The most eagle-eyed, frothy-mouthed tabloid editor looking for signs of a steamy affair between the two leads could not find so much as a mild breeze here.


Add some tip-top British thespians filling the air with polite menace (Harris, with Simon McBurney in close succession), and suddenly, Pitt has no allies at all, stranded in the desolation of Steven Knight’s ungainly script. Knight’s unpredictable levels of quality continue to zig-zag, with Allied falling somewhere between disappointing and mediocre. There’s no sign of the quiet brilliance exuded by Locke, but an unhealthy helping of Seventh Son’s slap-on-the-back misogyny. “Who are you thinking about?” Vatan asks a young British pilot, hours before the terrified boy is sent to almost certain death. “My mother, Sir” he replies. “Don’t.” murmurs a stale-faced Pitt, “Think of your father. He’s proud of you”. You what, mate?

Thursday, 4 August 2016

'Jason Bourne' - Review

8/04/2016 10:54:00 am 0
'Jason Bourne' - Review

 ★ ★  ☆


Matt Damon has his own movie stolen from him by a powerhouse Alicia Vikander in this surprisingly jaunty continuation of the Bourne saga. When ex-CIA operative Nicky Parsons (Julia Stiles all too briefly reprising her role) exposes a large chunk of agency secrets (a plot thread saddled with clunky references to Snowden), craggy-voiced Director Dewey (Tommy Lee Jones) is faced with the possible resurgence of skeleton-in-the-closet Jason Bourne (Damon). When Parsons brings Bourne out of self-imposed isolation in the fighting rings of the Greek-Albanian border, Dewey fears exposure of the agencies link with up-and-coming app developer Aaron Kalloor (Riz Ahmed) and his social media platform 'Deep Dream'.

While a little greyer around the edges, Damon slips back into his latchkey role with the same stone-faced ferocity, proudly restraining himself to ‘the silent type’ with barely 40 lines of dialogue to his name (something the popular press have been excitably headlining). To anyone familiar with the prior trilogy (where Bourne was never prone to waste words), why has this come as a shock?
The real unexpected pleasure of the film is Vikander as Heather Lee, Dewey’s ambitious second-in-command, a female character not once lambasted by her male colleagues for anything besides her questionable commitment to the cause, but is always two or three steps ahead of them, and has the know-how to slide into Bourne’s slipstream. With Damon resigned largely to silence, it’s Vikander who gives us a way into proceedings.

Leading man aside, the strength of the Bourne series has always been a tight and level focus, on one man and his mission, so why this sudden need to elevate what has been a mostly subtle subtext of surveillance into a fully-fledged theme by itself? Perhaps in an attempt to bring the series bang up to date with modern milieu and the smartphone generation, Greengrass and co-writer Christopher Rouse feel it is appropriate to show how the world has changed in Bourne’s absence, and that it’s not just the life and privacy of one man that matters anymore.  

Regardless of (quite likely admirable) intent, this decision is misguided. A stylistic rather than thematic change would have been a far more interesting route to take without upsetting the established formula. In the near-decade since The Bourne Ultimatum, action cinema has developed almost as considerably as technology (with the two often hand-in-hand). In a world in which the dance-like combat of The Raid and the long, unbroken takes of The Revenant are subverting the usual action composition, Greengrass’ trademark shaky-cam and choppy editing have not only become the norm, but wearisomely over utilised. 

Despite the constant exposure of their form to blockbuster audiences, the key chase sequences of Jason Bourne are still masterfully executed, and keep the pace of the film at such a rush that you barely have time to notice that how refreshingly CGI-free it is: a car versus bike romp amidst an anti-austerity protest is nail-chewingly physical. John Powell and David Buckley’s score is also simultaneously sly but essential, ramping up the adrenaline with the speed of a drum solo, but none of the obnoxiousness.

This rollercoaster of frenetic energy is still as pleasing as the series’ best entries (forgoing Tony Gilroy’s astonishingly forgettable The Bourne Legacy), but it’s only when stepping off the ride that we realise we’ve paid for another of Hollywood’s nostalgia trips. Stop me if this plot structure sounds familiar: wandering around back alleys and airports lead to a motor chase, some suspicious people watch everything on big screens in a dark room, there’s some shady interior politics, [SPOILER REDACTED], another chase, a grimy punch-up, [SPOILER REDACTED], play Moby’s Extreme Ways, roll credits. This is Greengrass, Damon and co. shrugging “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” even as noticeable cracks begin to form, and one can only hope that the next instalment can smuggle some insurgent originality through those gaps.

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

'Spectre' - Review

10/27/2015 02:12:00 am
'Spectre' - Review


★ ★ ★ ½ 

Daniel Craig and Léa Seydoux charm their way through this thrilling – if flimsy – ‘Best of Bond’ highlight reel. 007’s world is under threat from the inside and out as intelligence higher-up Denbigh (Andrew Scott) promises to scrap the Double-0 programme, while the mysterious Spectre organisation and it’s enigmatic leader Franz Oberhauser (Christoph Waltz) is brought into the light.


If this is truly to be Craig’s final outing as Bond (one can never be too sure given the erratic nature of his recent press outings) then I can’t imagine we could have asked for better demonstration of his commitment to the role. Craig’s Bond has been visibly moulded by the events of the previous three films (yes, even Quantum of Solace!) while still keeping his rough-hewn, bulldog appeal in full effect. His better side is especially brought out during his scenes with Madeleine Swann (Seydoux), a sly and shining character who injects a healthy dose of complexity and depth to the Bond girl formula.


Christoph Waltz (even in movies that don’t deserve him) never half-arses a performance, and Spectre refuses to be the exception. He’s cool and calculating without simply forming a carbon copy of his character from Inglorious Basterds: Hans Landa had a twisted logic and code of ethics about him, but Oberhauser is classic, unswayable Bond baddie. The unravelling plot that falls upon his shoulders also does a very nice job of neatly tying together the story of Craig’s Bond so far (again, even Quantum of Solace factors into the equation without everything falling apart!).

Though the plot does well with pre-written material, the new machinations established along the way suffer from 2015’s rampant strain of over-complicated story threads, making the film feel stuffed even with 148 minutes in which to play. Age of Ultron, Rogue Nation and now Spectre feign complexity but in the end bring only confusion. Everything here moves along at such a wallop that there’s not much time to pause and think, but during those rare moments the whole thing threatens to fall in on itself.

The speed at which events transpire also has the undesired side effect of underusing talented players: Monica Belluci is treated almost as a throwaway, and Scott’s character (the butt of a very amusing running gag) appears far too little for my liking.

With characters well-played and the plot sturdy to a point, the rest resembles a greatest hits album of the Bond franchise, repackaged for a new generation: as well as a brand spanking new car chase, we get updated versions of The Spy Who Loved Me’s train fight, the Casino Royale torture scene plus an enlivening swig of snowbound On Her Majesty’s Secret Service antics. There’s little tinkering with the classic Bond formula even by composer Thomas Newman, who gives his best themes from Skyfall a winning surge of adrenaline while top-notch cinematography by Interstellar’s Hoyte Van Hoytema seals the deal. 

Sam Smith’s much-maligned title song also got a pass (dare I say even a recommendation) for weaving in nicely with both the score and the trademark opening titles. It feels like a genuine Bond theme as much as Mendes’ latest feels like a genuine 007 adventure, warts and all. Because there is a difference between a Bond film and a Bond film: Skyfall was the former, and Spectre wears the latter title loudly and proudly.