Chris At The Pictures: western
Showing posts with label western. Show all posts
Showing posts with label western. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

'Logan' - Review

3/07/2017 03:23:00 pm
'Logan' - Review

★ ★ ★ ★ 

Hugh Jackman lays claim to the Wolverine character once and for all in this dark and edgy superhero spin-off. In a future where the other X-Men have long-since disappeared, Logan/Wolverine lives as a chauffeur across the Mexican border by night and cares for the mentally-damaged Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) by day. Their isolated existence is shattered when a desperate woman entrusts Logan with helping a young girl, Laura (newcomer Dafne Keen) escape sinister forces. What follows is less a special effects blockbuster than a gritty, bloody road movie, as the increasingly fraught Wolverine is forced to face uncomfortable truths about his legacy.

Most of us take Hugh Jackman’s most famous role for granted, but his six foot-plus, ever-vested physique and inescapable charisma have been a constant sticking point for fans of the original comic version: a stocky, lycra-suited potty-mouth. Logan is the first film to really take these differences into account, and even make amends: whilst Wolverine vehemently denies any truth to be found in Laura’s collection of X-Men comics, there’s easily enough money in his swear box to fix several church roofs. It helps that Jackman’s own dedication to portraying the character has never once wavered, and continues to enthral. As sad at it is to see him finally let Logan go, it’s a fantastically well-pitched goodbye.

In the aftermath of Deadpool, the “we need more R-rated superhero movies” declaration has been bandied about a lot with very little thought, but director James Mangold (paying reparations for his comparatively tame and uninteresting The Wolverine) actually uses it appropriately. The first spoken word of the film is a sharply-uttered f-bomb; a display of aged irritation, not an immature opportunity to curse. A 15 certificate does allow the film to breathe with the foulest of mouths, but also to consider themes of aging and death without alienating a younger audience. It’s difficult to imagine subtle details such as Wolverine’s arthritic claws, limp, permanent scars and dusty grey hair making it into the final cut of a glossy Bryan Singer or Matthew Vaughn production.

Oh, and it’s very, very violent. Wolvie’s rages have been the bloodiest staple of the franchise from the beginning, but here they finally mean something again. Every chest cavity ruptured, every decapitation, every maimed limb may as well add five years to Logan’s already extended life-span. For the first time, you look past the physical regeneration to the mental degradation. George Stevens’ Shane is unsubtly alluded to throughout – “There’s no living with the killing” – but it’s a well-intentioned nod that brings some levity, just as the gore is shocking but not without some sense of entertainment (particularly during an early display of Laura’s own powers).

Keen will certainly be one to watch. At first she appears to be contributing a very run-of-the-mill silent, staring child performance, but when the plot kicks into high-gear, the intensity she displays is truly remarkable. Stephen Merchant brings the weirdness of the older ­X-Men films as an albino mutant-finder, Caliban. References to Merchant’s “goggle-eyed” appearance might have begun as a long-running gag on the XFM show he used to host with Ricky Gervais, but his particular features and sarcastic intonations are a great fit, providing stark contrast to Logan’s introspective glowering and Xavier’s incoherent, rambling regrets.

That the film is so deliberately vague with regard to Xavier’s troubled recent history pays dividends: there’s little explanation about what happened to the other mutants, what state the wider world is in (our only indication here is empty backdrops and stricter border controls), or what the ‘Westchester Incident’ refers to. All we really know is that Xavier’s degenerating telepathic mind is now considered a weapon of mass destruction, which is itself enough to spark our intrigue and fear.


My social media feed this week has been full of people ranking Logan alongside previous X-Men films, but it seems weird to do so considering just how different it is. Subplots are almost exposition-free, visual effects are used sparingly, and even the cinematography and production design feel less machine-tooled. It’s a grimy, hyper-violent thriller; a toeing of the genre line (far more so than Deadpool’s already outdated in-jokes) that stands alone, and ends on the most perfect note imaginable.

Saturday, 2 August 2014

'Blazing Saddles' - Retro Review

8/02/2014 09:09:00 am 0
'Blazing Saddles' - Retro Review


Released in 1974 but set 100 years previously, Mel Brooks Western-comedy Blazing Saddles holds many accolades, including three academy awards, a place on four of the AFI’s prestigious ‘Top 100’ lists, but most notably it was the first major studio picture to contain a fart joke (seriously, look it up). And if that isn’t enough to catch your attention, then there’s really no hope for you. So don your cowboy hats, load your six-shooters and whoopee cushions to revisit a comedy classic.




The film tells the story of Bart (Cleavon Little), a black railroad worker who is employed by Baron Hedley Lamarr (Harvey Korman) as the new sheriff of Rock Ridge in order to scare off the townsfolk so the Baron can purchase the land. However, upon arriving in the town, the sheriff quickly proves his value to the townspeople and they begin to rally behind him and his partner Jim (Gene Wilder).

Little is likeable and charming in his role, bouncing off Wilder well, just managing not to be overshadowed by him through a selection of key scenes, the majority of which I’d rather not give away if anyone reading has never seen it (shame on you), save for a moment in which he turns to a pair of Klu Klux Klan members and exclaims ‘Where the white women at?’. Harvey Korman as Lamarr steals the show whenever he’s on screen, alternating between tight-lipped sarcasm and pants-on-head insane whilst perfectly offset by Slim Pickens as Taggart, his slow-minded crony. Mel Brooks makes an appearance as Governor Lepetomane and is instantly hilarious. There is just something about that cross-eyed, cigar smoking face gawping towards the camera that will never be anything but funny.




Where the comedy is concerned, there are great swathes of gags in all varieties, from simple visual jokes (a hangman placing the noose around a horse and the man sat upon it), to surrealist comedy (a pair of World War 2-era German soldiers making friends with the outlaws), to downright toilet humour (the famous beans around the campfire scene). The jokes are plentiful pushing the boundaries of what was deemed ‘good taste’ back in the 70’s, but they don’t all rush over themselves in an attempt to get quick laughs like many comedies nowadays. By placing an in-joke here, a farting scene there, then going completely for broke in the finale, it is clearly written by people who understand that the essence of comedy is timing, and Blazing Saddles has that down to a tee. Even the social/racial satire (though not always particularly subtle) is well-done, and at its heart is the idea of securing equality in a mainstream movie as a positive force in the mind of American audiences who – merely ten years previous – would have balked at the idea of a black protagonist.

One of the more striking things one notices upon re-watching the film is that, despite its comedic nature, it is still made like a traditional Western. The cinematography echoes the camerawork of classic movies such as The Searchers and the musical score carries a strain of epic motifs as well as the more traditional harmonica pieces one would come to expect. It might be conformity to stereotype but it helps sell the setting of the movie and therefore serves only to increase the audience’s bewilderment when the more surreal elements come into play (and trust me, when it gets to that point you’ll wonder if you've accidentally taped another movie over the film).


With its mixture of bizarre anachronisms, racial satire and toilet humour all played with a – nearly – straight face, Blazing Saddles is a remarkable comedy that has stood the test of time, and whose DNA can be clearly seen in everything from the Monty Python movies to Family Guy (Seth MacFarlane appears to have built up most of his back catalogue simply by ‘referencing’ or downright ripping-off the comedies of the 70’s and 80’s). Everything that A Million Ways to Die in the West does spectacularly wrong, Blazing Saddles did (albeit haphazardly) side-splittingly better forty years before. 

Friday, 6 June 2014

'A Million Ways to Die in the West' - Review

6/06/2014 04:56:00 pm
'A Million Ways to Die in the West' - Review


Directed, written by and starring Seth MacFarlane – creator of Family Guy and TedA Million Ways to Die in the West is a comedy western concerning a cowardly farmer named Albert (MacFarlane) whose girlfriend Louise (Amanda Seyfried) has left him. Desperate to win back her heart affections, he teams up with mysterious newcomer Anna (Charlize Theron) to hone his gun-fighting skills, find his bravery all whilst avoiding death by a menagerie of causes, including merciless outlaw and gun-slinger Clinch (Liam Neeson). 

In the background of this film is of course the original comedy western Blazing Saddles, a film that had laugh-a-minute jokes with characters and set pieces that were memorable. This, sadly, has none of that. The great strength in the better years of MacFarlane’s Family Guy, the comedy worked because there were twenty minutes in which to get the best laughs in, so a certain number of low-brow, crude humour was perfectly acceptable. This film just feels like a Family Guy episode that has been stretched far beyond a reasonable length at an ungodly two hour-long running time.




There is only so much comedy one can extract from bowel humour, and even then, it has to be carefully timed and set up properly. In this film, fart jokes and anatomy jokes and liberal use of foul language are just thrown in at a moment’s glance, and the worst thing is that there are jokes that should be funny (such as a flower being placed between the nether regions of an unconscious Liam Neeson) but don’t illicit a laugh because the setup hasn’t earned it. I can’t deny that there were three laughs during the film, but two came in the first twenty minutes and the third was during the end credits.

MacFarlane isn’t an enjoyable screen presence, and that is a problem when he’s front and centre for most of the film. Supposedly playing the only man who hates the West and a complete stranger to life there, he always looks a quick wardrobe change away from attending a premier: his hair, teeth and face are perfect while everyone else around him (save for the supporting cast) is miserably dirty. Charlize Theron does what she can in a role that only exist so MacFarlane can claim to his buddies that he kissed her, and Neil Patrick Harris is saddled with cringe-worthy dialogue that just doesn’t befit him. There are also a number of bizarre cameos, all of which appear to be there just for the director to show off all the buddies he’s made in the business.

It has to be said that in the film’s favour, the Western aesthetic is accurately replicated: a combination of period costumes, buildings, stunning landscape shots plus a suitably epic musical score provide a fitting backdrop – a handsomely shot one at that with a gorgeous palette bursting with colour – but all this is wasted on a film which just doesn’t meet the standards of it’s premise. 

A Million Ways to Die in the West is an exercise in extravagance: MacFarlane has gotten hold of a great big dressing up box and a bunch of his mates then headed out to the West to have a laugh for a couple of weeks with a script that in the end falls far too short. It drew three laughs from me, and with three writers and a shared back catalogue that includes good comedy material that just isn’t good enough.


1.5 stars