Chris At The Pictures: retrospective
Showing posts with label retrospective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label retrospective. Show all posts

Tuesday, 25 June 2019

TRANCE: revisiting Danny Boyle's stylish hypno-thriller

6/25/2019 05:03:00 pm 0
TRANCE: revisiting Danny Boyle's stylish hypno-thriller

This week sees the release of Yesterday, the new film and first collaboration from director Danny Boyle and writer Richard Curtis. The film (a light-hearted comedy about a man who wakes up one day in a world without The Beatles) is Boyle’s first since T2 Trainspotting. Even without the next James Bond picture (now directed by Cary Fukunaga and shooting amidst endless production problems) to his name, the Manchester-born filmmaker is a legendary voice in British film. 

A back catalogue featuring the landmark Trainspotting, the groundbreaking 28 Days Later and even the offbeat Millions (a now oddly wistful piece which sees the UK adopt the Euro as currency) has been revisited by any number of retrospectives, but the one feature to avoid any kind of serious consideration is his 2013 hypnosis thriller, Trance.

Even Sunshine, the film ironically killed by the weather in its opening weekend, has seen much re-appraisal by a hardcore of dedicated sci-fi fans (though debates over its final act still rage). Coming hot on the heels of his astonishing work for the 2012 Olympic Games opening ceremony (that established him forever as a national treasure), Trance found Boyle returning to his enfant terrible origins with a visually-arresting romp replete with sex and violence.

James McAvoy stars as Simon Newton, an art auctioneer in cahoots with Vincent Cassel’s no-nonsense thief, Frank. During a heist to steal a painting (Fancisco Goya’s Witches in the Air), Simon attempts to take the prize from Frank to avoid suspicion by his employers, but is struck across the head, incurring a heavy dose of amnesia. When intense questioning and torture fail to produce the Goya’s location, the gang seek the aid of hynotherapist Elizabeth Lamb (Rosario Dawson). 


Initially meant to be an outsider to the job, Elizabeth slowly comes to take on a femme-fatale role, challenging Frank’s leadership of the gang and leveraging control over Simon. Revelations about Simon’s past begin to come to light, and the search for the Goya becomes somewhat secondary to a stylish, seductive puzzle. 

Trance opened to decidedly mixed reviews: while many outlets praised Boyle’s direction and the performances of McAvoy and Dawson, they also found fault with the screenplay and lack of psychological subtext. Just about breaking even with a paltry $24 million worldwide on a $20 million production budget, the film came and went in a flash. Unlike many of Boyle’s previous films, it had no cultural significance (Shallow Grave, Trainspotting), massive Hollywood names (The Beach, 127 Hours) or easily sellable sci-fi spectacle (28 Days Later, Sunshine). Its heady mix of mystery-thriller premise and full-blooded exploitation sensibilities clearly missed the mark with audiences.

For my money, Trance still holds up as one of the most entertaining movies of the decade: three years before making waves with his multifaceted turn(s) in Split, James McAvoy relishes a role that requires layer-upon-layer of repressed memories and duplicitous facade. It’s difficult to illustrate without spoiling the surprises, likewise for Rosario Dawson - Elizabeth is another character who takes unexpected turns as the narrative unfurls, but Dawson plays her with stony conviction from the word ‘go’. Vincent Cassel is having a lot of fun as the sneering crook - who else could give such a great line in shouting and spittle?

They’re all captured beautifully by Boyle’s longtime DOP, Anthony Dod Mantle. Roger Deakins’ may carry the crown when it comes to digital cinematography, but Mantle (who won an Oscar for his work on Slumdog Millionaire) is sure giving him a run for his money. His masterful use of lens flare, reflection and the neon hues of Soho makes this one of the most striking movies ever made - he’s the only cinematographer who can make a traffic interchange look attractive.


Fellow collaborator, composer Rick Smith (frontman of Underworld), joins the fray with an eclectic soundtrack featuring music from Moby, UNKLE and Emeli Sandé, and his own scorching electronic symphony. Bombastic and fizzy is the default mode, but as the story morphs into something more tragic, so does the score: the track ‘Solomon’ is as haunting as anything Vangelis ever composed.

There’s no getting away from the fact that - as many of the reviews noted - the film is little more than empty spectacle: its diversions into the realms of pseudo-psychology and hypnosis remains entirely a method of narrative progression and visual playfulness over any serious depth or analysis on the human condition. The later movements into naked bodies and bloody shootouts do little to avoid these accusations, but there’s barely a director alive who could make that transition feel so natural.


His great command of the brief action sequences and total lack of inhibitions when it comes to sex makes his departure from Bond all the more gutting - there’s no promise that his take on the Ian Fleming icon would be any more feminist (though current script rewrites from Phoebe Waller-Bridge might’ve proved helpful there), but it would at least deliver the adrenaline shot the franchise sorely needs.

Trance is the sort of film that may be under threat in the current market, and its chances of standing up against the latest crop of megablockbusters would be about slim and none. This strange, hypnotic underdog still takes my heart over any number of those - if anything, its financial disappointment makes it easier to root for, to say nothing of its pure technical exhilaration. It’s not big, it’s not clever...but it is a heck of a ride.

Saturday, 2 August 2014

'Blazing Saddles' - Retro Review

8/02/2014 09:09:00 am 0
'Blazing Saddles' - Retro Review


Released in 1974 but set 100 years previously, Mel Brooks Western-comedy Blazing Saddles holds many accolades, including three academy awards, a place on four of the AFI’s prestigious ‘Top 100’ lists, but most notably it was the first major studio picture to contain a fart joke (seriously, look it up). And if that isn’t enough to catch your attention, then there’s really no hope for you. So don your cowboy hats, load your six-shooters and whoopee cushions to revisit a comedy classic.




The film tells the story of Bart (Cleavon Little), a black railroad worker who is employed by Baron Hedley Lamarr (Harvey Korman) as the new sheriff of Rock Ridge in order to scare off the townsfolk so the Baron can purchase the land. However, upon arriving in the town, the sheriff quickly proves his value to the townspeople and they begin to rally behind him and his partner Jim (Gene Wilder).

Little is likeable and charming in his role, bouncing off Wilder well, just managing not to be overshadowed by him through a selection of key scenes, the majority of which I’d rather not give away if anyone reading has never seen it (shame on you), save for a moment in which he turns to a pair of Klu Klux Klan members and exclaims ‘Where the white women at?’. Harvey Korman as Lamarr steals the show whenever he’s on screen, alternating between tight-lipped sarcasm and pants-on-head insane whilst perfectly offset by Slim Pickens as Taggart, his slow-minded crony. Mel Brooks makes an appearance as Governor Lepetomane and is instantly hilarious. There is just something about that cross-eyed, cigar smoking face gawping towards the camera that will never be anything but funny.




Where the comedy is concerned, there are great swathes of gags in all varieties, from simple visual jokes (a hangman placing the noose around a horse and the man sat upon it), to surrealist comedy (a pair of World War 2-era German soldiers making friends with the outlaws), to downright toilet humour (the famous beans around the campfire scene). The jokes are plentiful pushing the boundaries of what was deemed ‘good taste’ back in the 70’s, but they don’t all rush over themselves in an attempt to get quick laughs like many comedies nowadays. By placing an in-joke here, a farting scene there, then going completely for broke in the finale, it is clearly written by people who understand that the essence of comedy is timing, and Blazing Saddles has that down to a tee. Even the social/racial satire (though not always particularly subtle) is well-done, and at its heart is the idea of securing equality in a mainstream movie as a positive force in the mind of American audiences who – merely ten years previous – would have balked at the idea of a black protagonist.

One of the more striking things one notices upon re-watching the film is that, despite its comedic nature, it is still made like a traditional Western. The cinematography echoes the camerawork of classic movies such as The Searchers and the musical score carries a strain of epic motifs as well as the more traditional harmonica pieces one would come to expect. It might be conformity to stereotype but it helps sell the setting of the movie and therefore serves only to increase the audience’s bewilderment when the more surreal elements come into play (and trust me, when it gets to that point you’ll wonder if you've accidentally taped another movie over the film).


With its mixture of bizarre anachronisms, racial satire and toilet humour all played with a – nearly – straight face, Blazing Saddles is a remarkable comedy that has stood the test of time, and whose DNA can be clearly seen in everything from the Monty Python movies to Family Guy (Seth MacFarlane appears to have built up most of his back catalogue simply by ‘referencing’ or downright ripping-off the comedies of the 70’s and 80’s). Everything that A Million Ways to Die in the West does spectacularly wrong, Blazing Saddles did (albeit haphazardly) side-splittingly better forty years before. 

Saturday, 19 October 2013

Second Chances: A Love Letter to 'The Phantom Menace'

10/19/2013 12:36:00 am
Second Chances: A Love Letter to 'The Phantom Menace'

It's very difficult, when approaching Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace to ignore the baggage the mere mention of the film carries with it. The tiniest glance at the Internet and print media will show you the sheer hate this film has garnered in the 14 years since it's first release on May 19, 1999. It is even more difficult to present a defence of this film while being heard over all the negativity (none more so than on YouTube comments, where videos celebrating or promoting the film are flooded with the more generic 'this movie sucks' to 'George Lucas is a money-grabbing c**t who should go die').

Well I say enough is enough. I've taken the ridicule and the hatefulness and the spite directed at this film for almost my whole life. I am here to tell you right here, in complete honesty, without a shred of sarcasm or irony: I love this film. Before you flock to your keyboards to exclaim with scorn
, allow me to explain myself:

My earliest memory, not only of cinema but indeed my whole life, is sitting down in the VUE cinema in Cambridge with my Dad to watch this film. The slimmest vestige of memory I possess is sitting awestruck as Qui-Gon Jinn (Liam Neeson) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) flashed across the screen, cutting down battle droids with their lightsabers, John Williams powerful score echoing around the room and the surround sound causing my seat to literally shake. I even remember shouting 'Wow! Wow Daddy, wow!', barely able to contain myself at the sheer scale of what was happening.

Years passed, and I remember seeing the film on video at home, and at playgroup, making loud hushing noises to the other children so I could hear the film through tinny stereo speakers. Then the advent of DVD came and I spent many a Saturday morning sprawled on the floor re-living the film again and again, talking about it and re-enacting it with my friends, not even conceiving that someone couldn't like the film!


Then, around the age of 13/14, when I began getting really interested in films whose titles were not preceded by the words Star Wars, I began researching films online. Eventually I came across page after page of people spouting not just dislike for the film, but actual hatred. My teenage heart was crushed as I saw something nearest and dearest to me take the sort of treatment usually reserved for the lowest dregs of society:

- I watched in horror as one of my heroes, Simon Pegg, ranted and raved about the film, calling it 'the biggest piece of sh*t ever'

- I recoiled in shock as Patton Oswalt declared that his ideal use of a time machine would be to kill George Lucas before the film could be made

- I cringed as actors who appeared in the film became subject to laughter and mockery on talk shows when the film was brought up

The list goes on...

For a while, I thought maybe I'd been stupid for all these years, and that the film really was rubbish. When it was ever brought up by people in conversation (fellow classmates, parents, teachers, anyone) I spouted the status quo lines about how the movie was dreadful, how Jar-Jar was so annoying, how the story didn't make sense. I didn't believe a word of it, I was just afraid to speak out in case of further ridicule.

Then in 2011, I heard that the film was coming back to cinemas in retro-fitted 3D. Outwardly I sighed and moaned along with the rest of the Internet, but inside I was hopeful. By this time I was around 16 and hadn't watched the film in quite a few years, so I popped the DVD into my computer and got comfortable. It wasn't re-assuring. All throughout the film I just couldn't concentrate, my brain was looking for all the problems that people had pointed out, being overly critical and looking for every minute issue with the plot, acting, effects, dialogue, everything that I had read about was unfolding before my eyes and I didn't know what to think anymore, and as I put the disc away later I felt more confused than ever before.

When February 2012 came, and the film was a week from release, I decided to just go for it: I could try out 3D for the first time, see a film I'd not seen in the cinema for 13 years and maybe get a little more enjoyment out of it this time. The night before I was to see the film, I approached my Dad and asked him what he thought about the film after all these years. What he said was something like 'I like the film because I remember taking you to see it and seeing how much you enjoyed seeing Star Wars in the cinema for the first time, that on it's own is enough for me'. Twenty-four hours later, I was sat alone in Screen 9 of Cambridge Cineworld, 3D glasses on and feeling very, very nervous. The lights went down, and the film started.


I honestly cannot remember a more enjoyable time in my life. I grinned like a little kid all the way through. For two hours I was a little kid again, transported to far away worlds, experiencing creatures and space-ships and lightsaber duels, all on the biggest screen I could hope for. The 3D was quickly forgotten and I sat back in my seat, gobsmacked at how I could ever have believed the naysayers. I emerged from the cinema into the pouring snow feeling so full of energy I could have run home. Even standing still for twenty minutes waiting for the bus as snow collected on my coat couldn't dampen my spirits. 'How was it?' my Dad asked as I stepped inside the house an hour later, his face alive with anticipation as I littered the hall with snow. I looked right in his face, the smile still not faded from mine, and said:

'It was FUCKING AWESOME!'

Ignoring the disapproving retort from Mum and laughing along with Dad, I hung my coat up and sat at the table. 'What happened to all this 'Phantom Menace is rubbish' lark then?' he asked. I just shook my head, still grinning like an idiot, unable to speak again.

As I lay in bed later, composed and able to think straight, I mulled over why I had enjoyed the film so much, and came up with a list fairly similar to this:
  1. Star Wars in any form is best seen at the cinema
  2. The film looks fantastic
  3. The music is some of John Williams' best work
  4. I really did care about the characters
  5. The acting isn't bad, it's just a few lines of awkward dialogue
  6. Jake Lloyd is a child actor under enormous pressure, I can't fault him for a few bad deliveries
  7. Jar-Jar is actually occasionally funny, and anyone calling him a racial stereotype is clearly over-reacting
  8. The costume design is stunning
  9. The balance of CGI to solid effects is handled very well
  10. The final duel/space battle/ground battle almost gives Return of the Jedi a run for its money
  11. The duel itself is worth the price of admission
  12. The sound design in the podrace sequence is probably the best in any film ever made
  13. Knowing what happens in future films and the effects of this one scene on the entire story, seeing Anakin leave his mother almost brought me to tears. (Watching on blu-ray last month finally broke me, I'm not ashamed to admit)

There are probably more, but a longer list would take up too much time.

The key to enjoying the film is very simple: it is a film for parents to watch with their children. Children won't be paying attention to the politics or the iffy acting, they'll be too busy having fun with the space battles, podraces, saber duels and sheer spectacle. Let them worry about the 'problems' with the film when they reach adulthood and let them make up their own mind. Please don't with-hold this film from them because of what YOU feel about it.

Seeing their expressions of joy might give you more enjoyment than the film by itself, but that's the point, spend some time with them, sit down together and let them have the time of their lives. But at the same time, remember how you felt watching the original Star Wars films, when the dodgy dialogue or plot holes didn't matter as long as you could see a wondrous new landscape or a thrilling fight between the heroes and villains. There are few things wrong with the original trilogy, but those problems that are there always seem to be given a free pass because they're 'classics' (a statement I won't deny using myself, those films are more important even than most people give them credit for).

The bottom line is this: I have no shame in saying that I love this film, I would go far as to say it is my favourite film, and not just because I have a personal connection with it, but because it is a good film. It's not perfect, very few films are, but to say that it deserves what it's been through is shameful. I ask all you adults who felt so betrayed, disillusioned or disgruntled the first time to please give it another chance, and take a trip back into that galaxy far, far away that you all loved when you were children! It's the same place you left behind after 1983, you just haven't realised it yet.


May the Force be with you...always...