Chris At The Pictures: elle fanning
Showing posts with label elle fanning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elle fanning. Show all posts

Monday, 11 July 2016

'The Neon Demon' - Review

7/11/2016 04:41:00 pm 0
'The Neon Demon' - Review

★ ★ ★ ½ 



Nicolas Winding Refn accidentally completes Joseph Kosinski’s “Beautifully empty” trilogy (see TRON: Legacy and Oblivion) with this savagely gorgeous and astutely aimless…horror? Drama? Satire? The Neon Demon could be easily labelled as all three, or neither. Elle Fanning stars as Jesse, a shy adolescent model who arrives in L.A. with hopes of making it big in an industry renowned for mercilessly chewing up and spitting out thousands like her. In the words of Perturbator, “She is young, she is beautiful, she is next”. But there’s something different about Jesse: unlike her peers, she requires no plastic surgery or even makeup to achieve the effortless impeccability they strive so desperately for. Alessandro Nivola’s fashion designer describes her as “a diamond in a sea of glass” in the presence of jealous rivals Gigi and Sarah.

His compliment can also be applied to the film itself, but for a whole different reason: unlike the natural phenomenon of a precious gemstone to which Jesse’s beauty is compared, it has been expertly manufactured and precision-tooled to a mirror shine. While the vapid characters and empty script seem a natural extension of the world they occupy, the superior sound and vision are a wondrously artificial veneer. The respective scores to Blade Runner and Under the Skin have had a one night stand after watching The Guest, giving birth to Cliff Martinez’masterful soundscape. Rivers of warbling synths are interspersed with spine-tingling electronic shivers, complimented exquisitely by Natasha Braier’s cinematography. Every frame carries the colour and geometry of a Chvrches album cover dipped in fresh blood, with bursts of lens flare-borne prisms to make J.J. Abrams soil himself.

In this respect, and in the bitter, sniping dialogue of her would-be cohorts, the film echoes the vain fetishizing of Jesse’s presence, revelling in the superficial desire for visual perfection. Fanning gives Jesse just the right level of shoe-gazing timidity for every moment she’s not in the spotlight, before her posture suddenly unfurls, her eyes and mouth sharpening as the camera flashes begin to bounce off her damask skin. 

Jena Malone is skin-strippingly malevolent as Jesse’s makeup artist, Ruby, and Abbey Lee as Sarah acts everyone off the screen with her eyes alone in one of the films tensest moments: while Jesse is the centrepiece of the scene (rehearsing a catwalk for the designers), Sarah's defeat is depicted only by the echoing gunshot of high heels and the acid tears in her eyes.

“Why have sour milk when you can have fresh meat?” she asks. Though many have already noted a lack of actual meat to feast on here, it’s not the insufficient, nay, non-existent substance that pulls the film below sublime, but the pacing: like a fashion student who hands in their superbly-mounted portfolio a week late, there’s no sense of urgency to be found until the jaw-dropping, stomach-curdling dénouement; a sequence which is just about as unwarrantedly enjoyable as guilty pleasures can get. 

Perhaps I’ve been too fully indoctrinated by Hollywood editing that caters to attention deficiency, but I found great swathes of The Neon Demon (as I did with Refn’s Drive and Only God Forgives) tortuously slow and almost reliably uninvolving. Regardless of the many pulled punches and unusually justified superficiality, the director’s trademark distance remains: you can look, but you can’t touch.

Monday, 2 June 2014

'Maleficent' - Review

6/02/2014 04:03:00 pm
'Maleficent' - Review


A re-invention of the classic Sleeping Beauty, Disney’s new film Maleficent attempts to shed new light on the eponymous dark fairy, and how the tale has been told wrong all these years. After her supposed true love Stefan (Sharlto Copley) betrays her in exchange for the throne of the kingdom, Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) is left wingless and heartbroken, vowing revenge by planting a curse on his first-born daughter which only true loves kiss can revoke.

The most notable feature of the film is that it has clearly been made with the best of intentions: the film-makers have done their best to try and re-invent the story for a new generation, but this is also its biggest problem. The 1959 original was memorable, and for its few flaws it managed to tell a coherent story with diverse characters and gorgeous animation, and Maleficent sadly has none of that. It just cannot decide what it wants to be, whether it’s a dark origins story, the ‘other side’ of the story, or a complete re-telling. It can’t even work out what tone it wants to set, meandering between sickly colourful and darkly gothic from scene to scene.




Where the film truly shines is Angelina Jolie, who throws herself into the role and strikes a perfect balance between the malevolent cackling of the original character and the mystified, aimlessly wandering incarnation of the new story. Copley adds a level of grumbling malice as King Stefan, and the three fairies (brought to life in a mixture of live action and computerised motion-capture by Imelda Staunton, Juno temple and Lesley Manville) come packed with a few laughs here or there, even if their scenes descend mostly into leftover skits from The Three Stooges. 

Other pieces of the film that work in its favour are, ironically, the ones that directly reference or pay homage to the original, from Maleficents’ first appearance during the christening or Aurora meeting the prince for the first time. This care and attention sadly does not stretch to the wondrous strings of ‘Once Upon a Dream’ which are held back until the end credits and warbled rather drearily by Lana Del Rey. The climax, in its attempt to bring something new to the story sadly wallows in the predictable and relies heavily on CGI that any competent studio could have thrown together, a far cry from the lavish colours of the original.

Feeling anti-climactic and undecided, Maleficent is not a terrible film, for there are certain pleasure to be had within its 97-minute running time, but as a supposed re-invention of a classic story it feels terribly mediocre, and that’s just not something you expect from Disney. The magic is there, but its stifled beneath a film that veers from interesting to boring, engagingly dark and cringe-inducingly twee. 


2.5 Stars