Chris At The Pictures: greta gerwig
Showing posts with label greta gerwig. Show all posts
Showing posts with label greta gerwig. Show all posts

Friday, 6 April 2018

'Isle of Dogs' - Review

4/06/2018 06:06:00 pm 1
'Isle of Dogs' - Review

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

Wes Anderson’s latest is a colourful canine adventure that moves with the vigour of a wagging tail but bristles with fleas both literal and political. In this stop-motion expedition, Koyu Rankin voices Atari, the young ward of Mayor Kobayashi (Kunichi Nomura), dictator of the future Japanese archipelago. Kobayashi has exiled the city’s dog population to nearby Trash Island, due to an outbreak of canine fever, but Atari sets off to rescue his dog, Spots (Liev Schreiber). On an odyssey through the land of muck and mongrels, he is accompanied by a small pack of lost dogs (Ed Norton, Bill Murray, Bob Balaban, Jeff Goldblum). They’re led by the moody stray, Chief (Bryan Cranston). Meanwhile, an underground student resistance is working within the city to bring down Kobayashi and expose his decree as a sham.

I have to admit here that my Wes Anderson exposure is nominal: I found The Grand Budapest Hotel endearing, but felt that Fantastic Mr. Fox was an exhausting and massively irksome misunderstanding of the source material. Isle of Dogs falls somewhere in the middle: it’s visually impeccable in that classic Anderson manner (more striking here than perhaps ever before, in sharp juxtaposition with the grim environments), but the red-wine-and-bolognese witticisms and surprisingly bloody violence means that the stuff of children’s storybooks is once again rendered inaccessible to their readers.

Shot by Tristan Oliver, - a veteran of both Anderson’s previous foray into stop-motion and the works of Aardman - the images are impossibly fluid. Wallace and Gromit seems to have been a particular influence in the production design, too: it’s impossible to see a stop-motion dog silently roll their eyes with exasperation and think of anything else, and the robo-hounds deployed by Mayor Kobayashi smack more than a little of Preston from A Close Shave. Besides the stop-motion, there’s occasional use of 2D cartoons for computer displays and CCTV monitors, which liven the frame during the grimy grey finale at the farthest point of trash island. Our cohorts on this journey are the usual crowd (save Bryan Cranston, the entire pack have worked with Anderson on  multiple occasions), and are reliably charming. The problem was never going to be their individual voice performances (as if Jeff Goldblum as a gossip-loving mutt could ever be anything other than a joy), but the very fact they’re speaking American English. 

This wouldn’t be a problem, except for the fact that there are no subtitles for the Japanese characters, who can only be understood through a translator for the Mayor’s speeches (Frances McDormand) or through the interpretation of American foreign exchange student, Tracy (Greta Gerwig). Having the Japanese legends narrated by white actors only enforces this feeling of cultural tourism. As if to double down, a rant by Atari is faded to background noise as Goldblum despairs “I wish somebody spoke his language!” The dogs are meant to be our central, relatable characters in the story (which would be perfectly fine) but the only humans presented as scary or ‘other’ are the Japanese. 

Don’t get me wrong: I found a lot to enjoy in Isle of Dogs, and many others will fall for its particular brand of scruffy liveliness. With a cast and crew this likeable and skilled, it’s very hard not to exclaim sheer admiration of its craft. But when you develop a story that is so steeped in the trappings of another culture, only to deny that culture a real voice except through a white saviour character and foreign tools, loving animation and cute performances are little compensation.

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

'Jackie' - Review

1/25/2017 01:05:00 pm
'Jackie' - Review
★ ★ ★ ★ ½ 

I feel bad for Hayden Christensen. In recent months, four of his Star Wars prequel alumni have bathed luxuriously in the critical spotlight while his IMdB credentials continue to yield nothing but occasional straight-to-DVD fluff: Liam Neeson for Martin Scorsese’s Silence (his robe, ponytail and religious struggle a hair’s breadth from Qui-Gon Jinn), Ewan McGregor for the return of Renton in Danny Boyle’s long-awaited T2 Trainspotting, Joel Edgerton for Loving, and Natalie Portman for her immaculate turn in Pablo Larrain’s latest.

Less all-enveloping biopic and more crucial component, Jackie explores the personal and political frictions faced by first lady Jacqueline Kennedy from the instant her husband is shot to just after the funeral (one could imagine Oliver Stone’s JFK happening somewhere behind the scenes). Detailed by Mrs. Kennedy to an unnamed reporter (Billy Cruddup), it plays out over three acts: aftermath, furore and reconciliation. Many biopics need certain liberties to create a cinematic narrative, but – as far as I can tell, at least – this story inherently forms into a filmic mould. The great turning point from the first to second act comes when an unrecognisable Richard E. Grant (playing JFK’s confidant, Bill Walton) interrupts Jackie’s tsunami of hopes and wishes for her husband’s burial to impress upon the first lady that it isn’t just the world that’s changed, it’s her world.

Not that the audience needs reminding: in its construction, Jackie is the closest that arthouse American cinema has (and possibly ever will) come to Son of Saul. The constricted 1.66:1 ratio maintains an unprecedented level of intimacy, as does a near-refusal to allow anyone else within the frame. With Portman commanding the screen as she does, there’s little need. It’s a poised, sculptured performance that, by necessity, feels affected but never stilted. A few moments of adjustment are needed, but once rapport between the reporter and Jackie is established, it’s cinema-sized ASMR that cannot fail to attract awards buzz, and rightly so.

Motivations, fears and dreams are communicated to others (mostly Peter Sarsgaard as an increasingly frustrated and powerless Bobby Kennedy) as Shakespearean-style monologues, topped-up by a Mica Levi score that simulates an undiscovered Beethoven symphony. Some will hate it, finding it intrusive and obnoxious and far too loud, but – and this is possibly the most pretentious thing I’ve ever typed – if you accept the operatic nature of the film, it serves only to enhance the drama.

So focused is Larrain on character and emotion that the usual checklist of ‘true story’ signifiers is thoroughly barred. Don’t go looking for date stamps, location markers, obvious hard cuts to archive footage or fawning over who wore which dress on what day. There’s not even a “Ooh, look, it’s the Oval Office!” shot: the historic dwelling may as well be a labyrinth, a prison of memories. In one lengthy vignette, Jackie trawls the White House with a vodka bottle in one hand and her billionth cigarette in the other, pausing to rifle through the wardrobe in a rainbow of nostalgic depression. Not to indulge too much further in the Star Wars allusions, but it’s hard not to think of Queen Amidala, draped in opulence even as her palace is seized.

The assassination itself (possibly the most studied event in human history) is withheld until the last possible moment. But when it arrives, it’s the build-up, not the graphic nature that grips. For 90 minutes we’ve heard Jackie describe the moment in disturbing detail, seen her try to wash blood from her hair and confess to a priest (a brilliantly sombre John Hurt) her wish that she’d been taken instead. The toughest moment isn’t as Jackie attempts to hold her dying husband’s head together, but when she finally has to explain to her children why their father isn’t coming home, reflecting the parental responsibility she feels for the entire nation.

If there is a flaw in Larrain’s opus, it’s the finale. A distinguishable crescendo is reached with extraordinary grace and power…but the film continues for a further few minutes, losing a little impact as it goes. With just the smallest of restructures, Jackie could be an absolute masterpiece. Even so, it’s an infinitesimal near-miss, and no amount of narrative muddle could harm such a gloriously intimate, raw and politically pertinent film as this.