Chris At The Pictures: joel kinnaman
Showing posts with label joel kinnaman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label joel kinnaman. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

'Suicide Squad' - Review

8/16/2016 01:09:00 pm
'Suicide Squad' - Review

★ ★


This third instalment in DC’s ongoing attempt to establish a cinematic universe takes a break from the usual heroics to give the bad guys a moment in the sun. Having realised that the next Superman may be less-than friendly, shady government executive Amanda Waller (Viola Davis), delves into a portfolio featuring the worst of the worst in order to face the next big threat with her own powerful (and, more importantly, deniable) assets. The diverse group Waller hopes to recruit includes The Joker’s psychotic accomplice and girlfriend, Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie), expert hitman Deadshot (Will Smith), fire-commanding crime lord El Diablo (Jay Hernandez) and a selection of other scumbags, led by Colonel Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman).

With the promise of commuted prison sentences, Waller soon demands ‘Task Force X’ to deal with Cara Delevigne’s Enchantress, her brother (a CGI creation who wouldn’t look out of place in Gods of Egypt) and the beam of energy they’ve shot into the atmosphere for ill-defined maniacal reasons, ala the sky laser-wielding villains of Avengers, Fantastic Four, and even Transformers: Dark of the Moon. Still, sporting unique quirks and a slightly more malleable attitude to world-saving than their usually righteous enemies, the Suicide Squad arrive with a promise to inject a dose of fun into the DC-verse. 

I can already hear readers rushing to their keyboards to tell me that comparisons to Marvel’s surprise smash-hit superhero comedy are invalid, but hear me out. ‘Suicide Squad’ is a nasty name attributed to a bunch of people made to do good, whilst ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ is a grandiose moniker for, essentially, a band of idiots and miscreants. The two groups are warped reflections of each other, sideshows to the mainstream appeal of The Avengers or Batman and Superman. 

In filmic terms, both are properties arriving on the scene with a different set of expectations, but ultimately a very similar structure: a bunch of losers are begrudgingly drafted into battling a generic mystical bad guy to the sound of classic pop hits, with a far more influential villain looming in the background. What makes one a success and the other not is that Guardians of the Galaxy was always intended to be an irreverent knock-about, whilst Suicide Squad has been surgically altered and reconstructed after an unprecedented fan reaction to the initial trailer as well as critical exasperation towards the dour tone of Batman v Superman. The intention to change a gritty ensemble piece showcasing the true dark side of superhero movies (seemingly a natural fit for Fury director, David Ayer) into a tongue-in-cheek pallet-cleanser after Zack Snyder’s grungy effort is not an entirely misguided one, but it’s almost totally fumbled.

Before even setting foot in the cinema, no doubt your eyes will have been seared by a selection of gumball-coloured posters and a smattering of toe-tapping trailers awash with cheeky winks and sly one-liners, breaking through the crash-bang-wallop of standard marketing procedure. And, for a brief moment, the film itself appears to be holding true to this promise: the opening movement sees Waller (given an impressively hawk-like presence by Davis) deliver a brief introduction to the motley crew one-by-one, each character assigned a cheat-sheet adorned with neat little Easter eggs and a pop song to match. Unfortunately, around the time Killer Croc (a mutated cannibal who devolves into an exasperating black American stereotype towards the climax) is introduced, this becomes less finger-clicking and more eye-rolling; like when your brother gets control of the car stereo and plays 30 seconds of a song before getting bored and pressing ‘skip’.

There’s rarely even a method to this madness: a chunk of Black Sabbath’s Paranoid heralds a scene of Harley Quinn being extracted from her cell, because she’s…um, paranoid…I guess? Come to think of it, Harley’s actual condition is never explained beyond a slavish devotion to her ‘Mister J.’, and there’s nothing to indicate exactly what makes her a ‘metahuman’, either. Then again, the same could be said of Jai Courtney’s weirdly entertaining Captain Boomerang, and, to a far larger extent, Adam Beach’s ludicrously unnecessary Slipknot: brought into play literally five seconds before the squad set off, he’s introduced by an off-screen ADR line from Flag stating ‘he can climb anything!’, and whose defining moment is punching a woman in the face because ‘she had a mouth on her’. 

When the film realises you’re already tiring of these people, it cuts back to an enlarged cameo by Jared Leto’s much touted interpretation of The Joker. Our reward for sitting through months of method-acting publicity tripe is little over three minutes of screen-time, during which Leto rasps and cackles and wobbles around eccentrically…but never actually cracks a joke or contributes anything substantial to the plot. The comedy (the definition of which I brandish slightly looser than the entire squad’s morals combined) is left largely to Robbie, Smith and Courtney, in short inserts clearly added in reshoots (keep an eye on Joel Kinnaman’s changing hair length). 

Smith’s natural charisma breaks the shackles of Deadshot’s predictable, seen-it-all-before redemption arc, and Robbie sinks effortlessly into the skin of Harley. She delivers a near-perfect cinematic representation of the much-loved comic character, but this winning portrayal is often undermined by the films treatment of her. A short scene detailing her capture has Ben Affleck’s Batman giving her tongue-heavy mouth-to-mouth before pinning her down by the throat, and the camera constantly hangs at just the right level to make her hot pants-clad bottom the centre of the frame. This return to sexualised costumes and Affleck’s Clooney-esque delivery of “It’s over, Deadshot!” almost undoes 20 years’ worth of progress since the bums and puns age of Joel Schumacher’s Batman and Robin. 

Ayer totally, unapologetically calls Suicide Squad “an anarchic, punk rock art movie”. Anyone privy to the cynically constructed final product will be knocked unconscious by the massive irony, before briefly realising that the only daring move the film makes is to make Harley order a tortured and guilt-sodden El Diablo to “Own that shit!", in reference to a horrific act of slaughter he once committed against innocent people.

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

'Run All Night' - Review

3/18/2015 12:02:00 pm
'Run All Night' - Review
Stop me if you’ve heard this one: Liam Neeson is a drunk, wayward father living alone after ruining a connection with his family when an unexpected event brings his dark past back to haunt him. As the plot develops, Neeson’s character must lay his ghosts to rest, re-connect with his children and solve a lot of problems by shooting people. No, it isn’t Taken. Nor the sequels, A Walk Among the Tombstones, or indeed Non-Stop. This film is Run All Night, a New York-based thriller from Jaume Collet-Serra, whose previous credits involve the aforementioned airborne Neeson action flick.

Walking cliché Jimmy Conlon (Neeson) suddenly finds himself with one night to clear the name of his son, Michael (Joel Kinnaman) before both of them are found and killed by Jimmy’s mob boss Shawn (Ed Harris), who seeks revenge for the death of his own son. Neeson does his now standard grunts and grumbles, though a smattering of scenes between him and a very bored looking Harris splinter the monotony somewhat. Though we’ve left behind the nervous bravery of Schindler and the gentle tones of Qui-Gon Jinn, Run All Night proves that Neeson is serviceable as an action hero: he can still entertain, even if he cannot invigorate.


Joel Kinnaman – who handled himself with surprising and encouraging confidence in the remake of Robocop – appears oddly out of his depth here. His mad-eyes and fidgeting head give the impression of someone terrified not of imminent capture and death, but of an actor ill-prepared to mingle with Hollywood heavyweights such as Harris and Neeson. Uninterested and tired Harris may look, but at least he has the acting chops to get away with it.

Martin Ruhe’s run-of-the-mill cinematography is occasionally broken up by lavish aerial shots encapsulating the labyrinthine enormity of New York (including a measured amount of CGI trickery to leap from each location to the next), whilst a handful of nifty GoPro shots in amongst the action sequences give them unexpected vigour. The blundering boredom of Taken 3 is somewhat redeemed here; though the geriatric grittiness is past its prime and the formula has changed very little, there are thrills here aplenty.

Saturday, 8 February 2014

'Robocop' - Review

2/08/2014 02:27:00 am
'Robocop' - Review


When news, on-set photos and trailers finally emerged about the remake of RoboCop, Paul Verhoevens 1987 action flick about a debilitated police officer consigned to a robotic suit, you could practically feel waves of cynicism emanating from the internet. The issue with remaking this film is pretty much the same faced by 2012’s Total Recall: it’s a big budget eighties action movie that was massively successful and has gone on to become regarded as a classic. The difference is that whilst Total Recall (the remake) tried too much to change the formula of the story (Mars was replaced with Australia), the trailers and promotional material seemed to denote that RoboCop was merely an updating of the original story with CG effects and contemporary actors.

Considering the less than friendly response to the news of the new movie (I can’t deny being very sceptical at first), plus the fairly mediocre trailer, it’s a great relief to say that the remake is actually very well done. The main moral issue that was briefly raised in the original but sank beneath the brash action set-pieces is brought back to the forefront in this version, best exemplified in a startlingly bleak sequence in which detective Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman) is shown the full extent of his transformation into the Robocop suit by Dr. Norton (Gary Oldman), unable to cope with his less than half human existence and asks Norton to end it.

The other political and moral issues concerning the ethics of keeping Murphy alive, the blurred lines between man and machine and the issue of technology as protection are all raised in their own distinct ways, the former two being played out between Oldman’s character and Sellars, the owner of Omnicorp (Michael Keaton giving his best shot at a morally suspect, moustache-twirling villain), and the latter brought to the forefront by Samuel L. Jackson as a Fox News style presenter in a series of propaganda-like news reports, claiming that America is ‘Robophobic’ and presses the case for America to exploit its drone technology from the Middle East on home soil (rather symbolic considering the controversy surrounding the real-life use of such drones by the US Army in its overseas operations).

As for the action sequences, the main selling point for most people, they’re fairly well executed, packing a great punch in terms of sound design and visual effects, the use of handheld cam placing the audience in the thick of the fight, although it should be noted that this handheld element does find its way, rather distractingly, into the much more quiet, intimate scenes involving Murphy’s wife Clara (Abbie Cornish) and son (John Paul Ruttan). This may be an attempt to liven up these small vignettes as the acting by Cornish is a little uninspiring and the brief moment she shares with her husband before his accident seems fairly rushed. This means investment in their relationship is a little on the light side, and the family drama supposedly at the heart of the story seems like a sideshow in comparison to the much more interesting scenes between Murphy and Norton, the latter played sublimely by Oldman, who seems to only improve with age.

So on the whole, RoboCop may lack the family drama we were promised and some of the acting is less than impressive, but the perfectly fine, nuts and bolts actions sequences are up there with the original and the moral/political issues at its heart are still relevant and hold their own amongst the other elements of the story. A worthy remake, but a fairly functional film on its own.

3.5 Stars