Chris At The Pictures: katherine waterston
Showing posts with label katherine waterston. Show all posts
Showing posts with label katherine waterston. Show all posts

Monday, 15 May 2017

'Alien: Covenant' - Review

5/15/2017 01:08:00 pm
'Alien: Covenant' - Review

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

Ridley Scott loses the plot somewhat in this bold and barmy return to the Alien franchise. Ten years on from the disappearance of the Prometheus, a colonization ship intercepts a transmission from the missing crew. Acting Captain Oram (Billy Crudup) makes a beeline for its point of origin, against the express wishes of terraforming commander Daniels (Katherine Waterston). Upon landing, the colonists encounter a long-derelict spacecraft, a deadly pathogen and a single living soul: the android, David (Michael Fassbender), last apparent survivor of the Prometheus mission.

A far cry from the doomed optimism of Prometheus, the tone here is one of heavy portent. The colours are a grey wash, smiles are rarely cracked, and the narrative plunges a downward spiral to oblivion. Covenant has the chutzpah to pick up from its 2012 predecessor in narrative form, but the inclusion of Alien in the title and marketing shackles it to the franchise, and not always for the best.

It’s a viscous, bulging sac of visionary ideas struggling to burst forth from a largely uninspired narrative. Stop me if you’ve heard this one: shipmates woken early, a distress signal found, one wrecked spaceship, several minutes of screaming  (and a partridge in a pear tree). After the lukewarm, and even hostile, response to Prometheus, it feels like Scott had to make certain concessions before Fox gave the reins back, hence why every horrific moment or action pulse-pounder feels like an ‘in your own words’ answer to an Alien trivia exam (Jerry Goldsmith’s original music cues are brandished too, with the slyest of grins).

However, Scott still gets his own way: the viscera is unabashed and grotesque (H.R. Giger would be proud), the special effects and visuals are slick, and there’s a generous helping of weirdness the likes of which we haven’t seen since Blade Runner. His opus is referred to throughout, in small dialogue notes (“That’s the spirit!”) and the many exchanges between David and the colonists’ own doppelganger robot, Walter. Doctor Tyrell’s “More human than human” echoed endlessly in my head as the two examined, probed and prodded each other. Fassbender proves his mastery once more by giving both roles distinct idiosyncrasies and literally creating sexual tension with himself.

Not all of it works. The literature-heavy screenplay and po-faced discussions about the nature of artificial intelligence grate just occasionally, with some audience members giggling outright. The same derision was also aimed at the human characters’ casual approach to alien eggs and dark rooms, a staple of the franchise now wearing thin. I didn’t care one jot about the colonists, either. I have a sneaking suspicion we’re not really supposed to, but if that’s the case, why are there so many of them? Waterston and Crudup proved more than capable exceptions to my apathy (the former especially), but they’re side-lined in favour of everything else rolling about in this great tumble-drier of a film.


It’s predictable and overstuffed; a rush to connect this set of prequels with the original films that simultaneously takes too long to get going and sprints to the finish line, stomping inconsistencies into the ground in its wake. And yet, I’d argue Covenant is worth the sore feet. Scott remains an interesting case of authorship in Hollywood, and his dedication to religious themes and future prediction is as unshaken as ever… if only he could only find a way to balance them better with the xenomorph zealotry we all know and love.

Monday, 28 November 2016

'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' - Review

11/28/2016 11:38:00 pm
'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' - Review

★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆


This new yarn from J.K. Rowling is akin to retreating from 2016’s horrid winter into an old blanket. It’s warm and cosy with familiarity, but the loose threads are becoming more obvious, and the cold still seeps in through little holes. Eddie Redmayne stars as magizoologist Newt Scamander. Magizoologist Newt Scamander stars as the Eleventh incarnation of Doctor Who. He’s got the floppy hair, tweed suit, ungainly limbs, whimsical shyness, and even a sonic screwdriver (well, it’s technically a wand, but it’s still essentially a glowing stick he uses to open locked doors).

He also has his own TARDIS, albeit in the form of a magically enhanced suitcase, home to a menagerie of magical beasts. The contents of the case are let loose on 1920s New York, where Scamander is befriended by wide-eyed ‘nomaj’ Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) and hounded by plucky ex-Auror Tina Goldstein (Katherine Waterstone). As the trio scurry around in an attempt to return the creatures safely to the suitcase, another kind of sorcery stalks the streets. A dark force is causing calamity, and the Magical Congress of the United States sends the mysterious Percival Graves (Colin Farrell) to investigate. A second Salem movement is also on the rise, and, within its ranks, a reclusive teenager (Ezra Miller) secretly rebels against his oppressive mother (a ferociously intense Samantha Morton).

I’ve made it sound like you need a whole book to even understand the setup, but the film eases you into the flow with a good helping of earnest adventure before the underlying plot strands begin to convalesce. Much like the later Potter films, Beasts strikes a good balance between child-like immersion in the sparkling spectacle of a magical world, whilst still drawing out the darkness inherent in that universe. The production design alternates between gloomy, effervescent and gothic, and it’s very hard not to be won over by James Newton Howard’s soaring score.

When any franchise enters a new era, there’s always a great deal made of ‘bridging the gap’. With Newton Howard providing the musical connection, the character who guides us through is not Redmayne, but Miller, playing the sunken-faced and scary-haired Credence Barebone. Carrying more than a little Draco Malfoy in his glare and posture, he works wonders with a subplot that is occasionally misjudged in its intensity. The Potter universe is no stranger to darker themes (each film after Prisoner of Azkaban thrived increasingly on this), but the shadows here exist outside the wizarding world, in a place that feels all too real. It’s especially jarring when bookended with scenes of Newt, Tina and Jacob capering about. Still, the dénouement of Miller, Morton and Farrell’s relationship allows the movie to become Return of the Jedi for about two minutes (you’ll know once you’ve seen it), which is rarely a bad thing.

The entire arc of Farrell’s character is revealed the instant we see his haircut, but he’s clearly having good fun. He certainly draws a far more rounded character than his nemesis, Newt; a Tumblr fanfic creation brought to life. Any investment we have in our heroes is channelled through Dan Fogler, who has come a heck of a long way since I first saw him in Fanboys. His performance carries nuance, genuine emotion, and charm that doesn’t require a single wand wave.

Sadly, subtleties in acting and well-crafted details in the film’s milieu are betrayed by broader strokes. Small, delicately handled moments between Jacob and Tina’s sister, Queenie, are a treat, at odds with the reductive thumbnails of their overarching development (or lack thereof). Likewise, any display by the titular beasts is at its most endearing when focusing on Scamander’s tiny, pocket-borne Bowtruckle or the gold-loving, platypus-like Niffler. By the time massive monsters like the Erumpent begin crashing through Central Park with no real consequence, any charm is wearing off.


Even the city itself has this problem: the tiny shop windows and foggy back alleys are unique and intriguing, but the skyscrapers and lines of traffic feel copy-pasted (probably because they are). By the time we get to the effects-heavy finale, it’s only the emotional nature of the climax that redeems its use of 2016’s default antagonist; a CGI cloud. If I may be allowed to return to the Doctor Who analogy, Beasts’ final act is very much in the same vein as a ‘monster of the week’ episode: a fair bit of crying, some very iffy special effects, and, most importantly, an emphasis on empathy over any kind of confused pseudo-logic. Thankfully, its spirit is less Stephen Moffat and more Russell T. Davies. If there really are four more of these to be conjured, let’s hope it stays that way.