Chris At The Pictures: antihero
Showing posts with label antihero. Show all posts
Showing posts with label antihero. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 October 2018

'Venom' - Review

10/03/2018 02:24:00 pm 13
'Venom' - Review

★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

Here is Sony Pictures' second attempt to build a Marvel universe to rival Disney's (stop laughing, they're deadly serious). Venom - seemingly dumped on our world from a rip in the space-time continuum splicing the year 2005 with the present day - sits comfortably alongside the likes of Elektra, Ghost Rider and Daredevil. Grimdark pretentions? Check. Positioning of protagonist as edgy antihero? Check. Ludicrous rubber costumes? I wish.

Star of the show here is the eponymous blob, a parasitical alien which attaches to a living host and imbues them with superhuman abilities. Venom finds a vehicle in smug, down-on-his-luck journalist, Eddie Brock (a spectacularly miscast Tom Hardy). "You look like shit!" exclaims the owner of Brock's local corner shop, as he swaggers cooly past with hair perfectly styled, sporting just the right kind of stubble and trendier clothes than anyone else within fifty miles.

He's on the trail of billionaire Carlton Drake (Riz Ahmed), a cardboard cutout superviallain obsessed with human-symbiote experimentation. Brock's investigation (assisted by an upsettingly underused Jenny Slate) exposes him to one of the parasites. Hence, Venom - a giant, foul-mouthed monster with a penchant for biting people's heads off - is born.

But before the beast is unleashed, we must suffer an hour of 'Superhero Origin Stories for Dummies', replete with a plodding romance subplot (Hardy and a bored, bewigged Michelle Williams conjure no chemistry), unintelligible action sequences and broiling inner turmoil. At least, that's what one assumes Hardy is going for with his Jim Carrey-esque line in spittle and shrieking.

When the latter half finally sees Venom emerge, things fail to improve. An age rating promising gory ultra-violence is all bark and no bite, with most antagonists dispatched in a blur of swinging tentacles and nondescript crunching sounds. The genuinely enticing body-horror aspects of the comic book source are buried, and the Bronson star's clear commitment to depraved lunacy proves all for naught. 

It's difficult to see loyal fans of the Venom character - still searching for salvation after Spider-Man 3 - getting back on board (incidentally, the producer who insisted upon Venom's involvement in said misfire, Avi Arad, returns to supervise this outing). As a disposable piece of popcorn fodder, it's merely hopeless. As the basis of a major cinematic enterprise, it's poison.

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

'Logan' - Review

3/07/2017 03:23:00 pm
'Logan' - Review

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Hugh Jackman lays claim to the Wolverine character once and for all in this dark and edgy superhero spin-off. In a future where the other X-Men have long-since disappeared, Logan/Wolverine lives as a chauffeur across the Mexican border by night and cares for the mentally-damaged Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) by day. Their isolated existence is shattered when a desperate woman entrusts Logan with helping a young girl, Laura (newcomer Dafne Keen) escape sinister forces. What follows is less a special effects blockbuster than a gritty, bloody road movie, as the increasingly fraught Wolverine is forced to face uncomfortable truths about his legacy.

Most of us take Hugh Jackman’s most famous role for granted, but his six foot-plus, ever-vested physique and inescapable charisma have been a constant sticking point for fans of the original comic version: a stocky, lycra-suited potty-mouth. Logan is the first film to really take these differences into account, and even make amends: whilst Wolverine vehemently denies any truth to be found in Laura’s collection of X-Men comics, there’s easily enough money in his swear box to fix several church roofs. It helps that Jackman’s own dedication to portraying the character has never once wavered, and continues to enthral. As sad at it is to see him finally let Logan go, it’s a fantastically well-pitched goodbye.

In the aftermath of Deadpool, the “we need more R-rated superhero movies” declaration has been bandied about a lot with very little thought, but director James Mangold (paying reparations for his comparatively tame and uninteresting The Wolverine) actually uses it appropriately. The first spoken word of the film is a sharply-uttered f-bomb; a display of aged irritation, not an immature opportunity to curse. A 15 certificate does allow the film to breathe with the foulest of mouths, but also to consider themes of aging and death without alienating a younger audience. It’s difficult to imagine subtle details such as Wolverine’s arthritic claws, limp, permanent scars and dusty grey hair making it into the final cut of a glossy Bryan Singer or Matthew Vaughn production.

Oh, and it’s very, very violent. Wolvie’s rages have been the bloodiest staple of the franchise from the beginning, but here they finally mean something again. Every chest cavity ruptured, every decapitation, every maimed limb may as well add five years to Logan’s already extended life-span. For the first time, you look past the physical regeneration to the mental degradation. George Stevens’ Shane is unsubtly alluded to throughout – “There’s no living with the killing” – but it’s a well-intentioned nod that brings some levity, just as the gore is shocking but not without some sense of entertainment (particularly during an early display of Laura’s own powers).

Keen will certainly be one to watch. At first she appears to be contributing a very run-of-the-mill silent, staring child performance, but when the plot kicks into high-gear, the intensity she displays is truly remarkable. Stephen Merchant brings the weirdness of the older ­X-Men films as an albino mutant-finder, Caliban. References to Merchant’s “goggle-eyed” appearance might have begun as a long-running gag on the XFM show he used to host with Ricky Gervais, but his particular features and sarcastic intonations are a great fit, providing stark contrast to Logan’s introspective glowering and Xavier’s incoherent, rambling regrets.

That the film is so deliberately vague with regard to Xavier’s troubled recent history pays dividends: there’s little explanation about what happened to the other mutants, what state the wider world is in (our only indication here is empty backdrops and stricter border controls), or what the ‘Westchester Incident’ refers to. All we really know is that Xavier’s degenerating telepathic mind is now considered a weapon of mass destruction, which is itself enough to spark our intrigue and fear.


My social media feed this week has been full of people ranking Logan alongside previous X-Men films, but it seems weird to do so considering just how different it is. Subplots are almost exposition-free, visual effects are used sparingly, and even the cinematography and production design feel less machine-tooled. It’s a grimy, hyper-violent thriller; a toeing of the genre line (far more so than Deadpool’s already outdated in-jokes) that stands alone, and ends on the most perfect note imaginable.